ABSTRACT
To make the most of a global network effect and to search and filter the Long Tail, a collaborative tagging approach to social search should be based on the global activity of tagging, rating and filtering. We take a further step towards this objective by proposing a shared conceptualization of both the activity of tagging and the organization of the tagosphere in which tagging takes place. We also put forward the necessary data standards to interoperate at both data format and semantic levels. We highlight how this conceptualization makes provision for attaching identity and meaning to tags and tag categorization through a Wikipedia-based collaborative framework. Used together, these concepts are a useful and agile means of unambiguously defining terms used during tagging, and of clarifying any vague search terms. This improves search results in terms of recall and precision, and represents an innovative means of semantics-aware collaborative filtering and content ranking.
- T. Çelik and D. Powazek. Rel-Tag: Draft specification. Microformats, 2005. Bud Gibson, The Community Engine. xFolk (RC1): Draft specification, Microfornats, 2006, Available at http://microformats.org/wiki.Google Scholar
- R. T. Fielding. Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of California, Irvine 2000 Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Gabrilovich and S. Markovitch. Computing Semantic Relatedness using Wikipedia-based Explicit Semantic Analysis. Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Hyderabad, India, January 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Golder and B. Huberman. Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2):198--208, 2006 Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Gruber. Ontology of Folksonomy. Invited keynote to the First on-Line conference on Metadata and Semantics Research (MTSR'05), 2005.Google Scholar
- M. Kipp and D. Campbell. Patterns and Inconsistencies in Collaborative Tagging Systems. Annual General Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006.Google Scholar
- K. F. Lawrence, M. C. Schraefel. Freedom and Restraint Tags, Vocabularies and Ontologies. Information and Communication Technologies (ICTTA'06), pages 1745--1750, IEEE Computer Society, 2006.Google Scholar
- R. Neches, R. Fikes, T. Finin, T. Gruber, R. Patil, T. Senator, and W. R. Swartout. Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Magazine, 12(3):16--36, 1991. Conger., S., and Loch, K. D. (eds.). Ethics and computer use. Commun. ACM 38, 12 (entire issue). Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. P. Reed. The law of the pack. Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Publishing Corp., February 2000.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Enabling semantics-aware collaborative tagging and social search in an open interoperable tagosphere
Recommendations
Survey on social tagging techniques
Social tagging on online portals has become a trend now. It has emerged as one of the best ways of associating metadata with web objects. With the increase in the kinds of web objects becoming available, collaborative tagging of such objects is also ...
A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation
DCMI '08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata ApplicationsSocial tagging empowers users to categorize content in a personally meaningful way while harnessing their potential to contribute to a collaborative construction of knowledge (Vander Wal, 2007). In addition, social tagging systems offer innovative ...
Tagging and searching: Search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web
Many Web sites have begun allowing users to submit items to a collection and tag them with keywords. The folksonomies built from these tags are an interesting topic that has seen little empirical research. This study compared the search information ...
Comments