skip to main content
10.1145/147156.147162acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi3dConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

A demonstrated optical tracker with scalable work area for head-mounted display systems

Published:01 June 1992Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Advanced Micro Devices, Am7968/Am7969 TAXIchip ATticle Reprints, SunnyvaIe, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Antonsson, E. K., and R.W. Mann. Automatic 6-D.O.F. kinematic trajectory acquisition and analysis. J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 111, (March 1989) pp. 31-39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Ascension Technology Corporation. The Bird 6D Input Device, Burlington, Vermont, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Ascension Technology Corporation. A Flock of Birds product description sheet, Burlington, Vermont, April 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Axt, Walter E. Evaluation of a pilot's line-of-sight using ultrascmic measurements and a helmet mounted display. Proceedings IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conf. (Dayton, OH, May 18-22, 1987)pp. 921-927.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Azuma, Ronald, and Mark Ward. Space-resection by collinearity" mathematics behind the optical ceiling head-tracker. UNC Chapel Hill Dept. of Computer Science technical report TR 91-048, Nov. 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Bishop, Gary and Henry Fuchs. The self-tracker: A smart optical sensor on silicon. Proceedings of the 1984 MIT Conference on Advanced Research on VLS1 (Dedham, MA: Artech House, Jan 1984)pp. 65-73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Burnside, C. D. Mapping from Aerial Photographs. Granada Publishing Limited, G. Britain, 1979, pp. 248- 258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Chung, Jim, Mark Harris, Fred Brooks, et al. Exploring Virtual Worlds with Head-Mounted Displays. SPIE Proceedings vol. 1083 Non-Holographic True 3- Dimensional Display Technologies (Los Angeles, CA, Jan 15-20, 1989).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Church, Earl. Revised geometry of the aerial photograph. Bulletins on Aerial Photograrnmetry, No. 15, Syracuse University, 1945.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Cook, Anthony. The helmet-mounted visual system in flight simulation. Proceedings Flight simulation: Recent developments in technology and use. (Royal Aeronautical Society, London, England, Apr. 12-13, 1988) pp. 214-232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Fake Space Labs, Binocular Omni-Orientation Monitor (BOOM), Menlo Park, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Fen'in, Frank J. Survey of helmet tracking technologies. SPIE Vol. 1456 Large-Screen Projection, Avionic, and Helmet-Mounted Displays (1991) pp. 86-94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Fuchs, Henry, John Poulton, John Eyles, et. al. Pixel- Planes 5: A Heterogeneous Multiprocessor Graphics System Using Processor-Enhanced Memories. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '89 (Boston, MA, July 31- Aug 4, 1989). In Computer Graphics 23, 3 (July 1989) pp. 79-88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Furness, Tom, and Gary Bishop. Personal communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Hamamatsu. Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu City, Japan, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Hardyman, G. M. and M. H. Smith. Helmet mounted display applications for enhanced pilot awareness. Proceedings of AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference (Boston, MA, Aug. t4-16, 1989) pp. 221- 225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18.Hughes, John F., and A1 Bart. Personal communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Liang, Jiandong, Chris Shaw, Mark Green. On Temporal- Spatial Realism in the Virtual Reality Environment. Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (Hilton Head, SC, Nov 11-13 1991)pp. 19-25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Logitech, Inc. Logitech 3-D Mouse news release. July 30, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.POLHEMUS 3SPACE User's Manual, OPM3016-004B, Colchester, Vermont, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Press, William, Brian Flannery, Saul Teukolsky, William Vetterling. Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, USA, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.SELCOM. SELSPOT II HARDWARE and MULTILab Software, Southfield, Michigan, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Smith Jr., B. R. Digital head tracking and position prediction for helmet mounted visual display systems. Proceedings of AIAA 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, (Reno, NV, Jan. 9-12, 1984).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. 25.So, Richard H., and Michael J. Griffin. Effects of time delays on head tracking performance and the benefits of lag compensation by image deflection. Proceedings of AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference (New Orleans, LA, Aug. 12-14, 1991)pp. 124-130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.Sorensen, Brett, Max Donath, Guo-Ben Yang, and Roland Starr. The Minnesota scanner: a prototype sensor for three-dimensional tracking of moving body segments. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 5, 4, (August 1989), pp. 499-509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. 27.Sutherland, Ivan. A head-mounted three dimensional display. Fall Joint Computer Conference, AFIPS Conference Proceedings, 33 (1968)pp. 757-764.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.Wang, Jih-Fang, Vernon Chi, and Henry Fuchs. A realtime 6D optical tracker for head-mounted display systems. Proceedings of 1990 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (Snowbird, Utah, 1990). in Computer Graphics 24, 2 (March 1990) pp. 205-215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.Wang, Jih-Fang, Ronald Azuma, Gary Bishop, Vernon Chi, John Eyles, Henry Fuchs. Tracking a head-mounted display in a room-sized environment with head-mounted cameras. SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1290 Helmet-Mounted Displays II (Orlando, FL, Apr 19-20 1990) pp. 47-57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. 30.Welch, Brian, Ron Kruk, lean Baribeau, et al. Flight Simulator: Wide-Field-Of-View Helmet-Mounted Infinity Display System, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory technical report AFHRL-TR-85-59, May 1986, pp. 48- 60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.Wolf, Paul. Elements of Photogrammetry, With Air Photo Interpretation and Remote Sensing, 2rid ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.Woltring, Herman. Single- and Dual-Axis Lateral Photodetectors of Rectangular Shape. IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, (August 1975) pp. 581-590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A demonstrated optical tracker with scalable work area for head-mounted display systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          I3D '92: Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics
          June 1992
          215 pages
          ISBN:0897914678
          DOI:10.1145/147156

          Copyright © 1992 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 June 1992

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate148of485submissions,31%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader