Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks

ABSTRACT

Fitts' law, a one-dimensional model of human movement, is commonly applied to two-dimensional target acquisition tasks on interactive computing systems. For rectangular targets, such as words, it is demonstrated that the model can break down and yield unrealistically low (even negative!) ratings for a task's index of difficulty (ID). The Shannon formulation is shown to partially correct this problem, since ID is always ≥ 0 bits. As well, two alternative interpretations “target width” are introduced that accommodate the two-dimensional nature of tasks. Results of an experiment are presented that show a significant improvement in the model's performance using the suggested changes.

References

1. 1.Bontz, J., 15oo~, K. 5., & Cowan, W. 15. (1991). Fitts's law studies of directional mouse movement. Proceedings of Graphics Interface '91, 216-223. Toronto: CIPS.
2. 2.Card, S. K., English, W. K., & Burr, B. J. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21, 601-613.
3. 3.Epps, B. W. (1986). Comparison of six cursor control devices based on Fitts' law models. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 327-331.
4. 4.Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
5. 5.FiRs, P. M., & Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103-112.
6. 6.Gillan, D. J., Holden, K., Adam, S., Rudisill, M., & Magee, L. (1990). How does Fitts' law fit pointing and dragging? Proceedings of the CHI '90 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 227-234. New York: ACM.
7. 7.Guilford, J. P., & Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. 8.Jagacinski, R. J., & Monk, D. L. (1985). Fitts' law in two dimensions with hand and head movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 77-95.
9. 9.Jellinek. H. D. & Card, S. K. (1990). Powermiee and user performance. Proceedings of the CH1 '90 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 213-220. New York: ACM.
10. 10.MacKenzie, I. S. (in press). Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction.
11. 11.MacKenzie, I. S, (1989). A note on the informationtheoretic basis for Fitts' law. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21,323-330.
12. 12.MacKenzie, I. S., Sellen, A., & Buxton, W. (1991). A comparison of input devices in elemental pointing and dragging tasks. Proceedings of the CHI '91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 161-166. New York: ACM.
13. 13.Sheridan, T. B., & Ferrdl, W. R. (1963). Remote manipulative control with transmission delay. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 4, 25- 29.
14. 14.Ware, C., & Mikaelian, H. H. (1989). A evaluation of an eye tracker as a device for computer input. Proceedings of the CHI+GI '87 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics interface, 183-188. New York: ACM.
15. 15.Welford, A. T. (1968). Fundamentals ofskill. London: Methuen.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction devices

      • Touch screens