skip to main content
10.1109/DS-RT.2008.28guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesds-rtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Communicating Eye Gaze across a Distance without Rooting Participants to the Spot

Published:27 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Eye gaze is an important conversational resource that until now could only be supported across a distance if people were rooted to the spot. We introduce EyeCVE, the world’s first tele-presence system that allows people in different physical locations to not only see what each other are doing but follow each other’s eyes, even when walking about. Projected into each space are avatar representations of remote participants, that reproduce not only body, head and hand movements, but also those of the eyes. Spatial and temporal alignment of remote spaces allows the focus of gaze as well as activity and gesture to be used as a resource for non-verbal communication. The temporal challenge met was to reproduce eye movements quick enough and often enough to interpret their focus during a multi-way interaction, along with communicating other verbal and non-verbal language. The spatial challenge met was to maintain communicational eye gaze while allowing free movement of participants within a virtually shared common frame of reference. This paper reports on the technical and especially temporal characteristics of the system.

References

  1. M. Argyle and J. Graham. The central europe experiment - looking at persons and looking at things. Journal of Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behaviour, 1:6-16, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. C. Goodwin. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas, editor, Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pages 97-12. New York: Irvington, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Goodwin. Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Goodwin. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32:1489-1522, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Gross, S. Wrmlin, M. Naef, E. Lamboray, C. Spagno, A. Kunz, E. Koller-Meier, T. Svoboda, L. Van Gool, S. Lang, K. Strehlke, A. V. Moere, and O. Staadt. blue-c: a spatially immersive display and 3d video portal for telepresence. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 22(2):819- 827, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Hauber, H. Regenbrecht, M. Billinghurst, and A. Cockburn. Spatiality in videoconferencing. In Proceedings of ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 413- 422, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Isaacs and J. Tang. What video can and cannot do for collaboration. Multimedia Systems, 2(2):63-73, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Kenny, H. Koesling, D. Delaney, S. McLoone, and T. Ward. A preliminary investigation into eye gaze data in a first person shooter game. In R. Z. E. K. Y. Merkuryev, editor, Proceedings of Modelling and Simulation, pages 733- 740, Riga, Latvia, 2005. ECMS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. C. Khullar and N. I. Badler. Where to look? automating attending behaviors of virtual human characters. In Proceedings of Autonomous Agents, pages 16-23, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Kirk and D. S. Fraser. Comparing remote gesture technologies for supporting collaborative physical tasks. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Human Factors in computing systems, pages 1191-1200, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Kuzuoka, T. Kosuge, and M. Tanaka. Gesturecam: a video communication system for sympathetic remote collaboration. In Proceedings ofACM Computer Supported Co-operative Work, pages 35-43, New York, NY, USA, 1994. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. P. Lee, J. B. Badler, and N. I. Badler. Eyes alive. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 21(3):637-644, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. Leigh and D. Zee. The neurology of eye movements. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 3 edition, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. Lerner. Selecting next speaker: the context-sensitive operation of a context free organization. Language in Society, 32(2):177-201, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. Meehan, S. Razzaque, M. Whitton, and J. Brooks, F.P. Effect of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, pages 141- 148, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Murgia, R. Wolff, W. Steptoe, P. Sharkey, D. Roberts, E. de V. Guimaraes, A. Steed, and J. Rae. A tool for replay and analysis of gaze-enhanced multiparty sessions captured in immersive collaborative environments. In Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, Vancouver, Canada, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. N. Murray and D. Roberts. Comparison of head gaze and head and eye gaze within an immersive environment. In Proceedings of IEEE Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, pages 70-76, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Nguyen and J. Canny. Multiview: Spatially faithful group video conferencing. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Human Factors in computing systems, pages 512-521. ACM Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. Okada, F. Maeda, Y. Ichikawaa, and Y. Matsushita. Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance: Majic design. In Proceedings of ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 385-393, New York, 1994. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. B. Pan, H. A. Hembrooke, G. K. Gay, L. A. Granka, M. K. Feusner, and J. K. Newman. The determinants of web page viewing behavior: an eye-tracking study. In Proceedings of Eye tracking Research & Applications, pages 147-154, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. R. Raskar, G. Welch, M. Cutts, A. Lake, L. Stesin, and H. Fuchs. The ofce of the future: A unied approach to image-based modeling and spatially immersive displays. In Proceedings of Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques , pages 179-188. ACM Press, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 85:618-660, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. D. Roberts, D. Marshall, S. McLoone, D. Delaney, and R. Aspin. Exploring the use of local inconsistency measures as thresholds for dead reckoning update packet generation. In Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, pages 95-202, Montreal, Canada, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. J. Roberts, I. Heldal, O. Otto, and R. Wolff. Factors influencing flow of object focussed collaboration in collaborative virtual environments. Virtual Reality Journal, Special Issue on Collaborative Virtual Environments for Creative People, 10(2):116-133, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. W. Steptoe, R. Wolff, A. Murgia, E. de V. Guimaraes, J. Rae, and A. Steed. Eye-tracking for avatar eye-gaze and interactional analysis in immersive collaborative virtual environments. In Proceedings of ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Diego, California, USA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. R. Vertegaal, G. V. der Veer, and H. Vons. Effects of gaze on multiparty mediated communication. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000, pages 95-102. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. R. Vertegaal, I. Weevers, C. Sohn, and C. Cheung. Gaze- 2: conveying eye contact in group video conferencing using eye-controlled camera direction. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 521-528, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Communicating Eye Gaze across a Distance without Rooting Participants to the Spot

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image Guide Proceedings
                DS-RT '08: Proceedings of the 2008 12th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications
                October 2008
                312 pages
                ISBN:9780769534251

                Publisher

                IEEE Computer Society

                United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 27 October 2008

                Qualifiers

                • Article

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader