skip to main content
article

Distance matters

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 September 2000Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Giant strides in information technology at the turn of the century may have unleashed unreachable goals. With the invention of groupware, people expect to communicate easily with each other and accomplish difficult work even though they are remotely located or rarely overlap in time. Major corporations launch global teams, expecting that technology will make "virtual collocation" possible. Federal research money encourages global science through the establishment of "collaboratories." We review over 10 years of field and laboratory investigations of collocated and noncollocated synchronous group collaborations. In particular, we compare collocated work with remote work as it is possible today and comment on the promise of remote work tomorrow. We focus on the sociotechnical conditions required for effective distance work and bring together the results with four key concepts: common ground, coupling of work, collaboration readiness, and collaboration technology readiness. Groups with high common ground and loosely coupled work, with readiness both for collaboration and collaboration technology, have a chance at succeeding with remote work. Deviations from each of these create strain on the relationships among teammates and require changes in the work or processes of collaboration to succeed. Often they do not succeed because distance still matters.

References

  1. Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Auramaki, E., Robinson, M., Aaltonen, A., Kovalainen, M., Liinamaa, A., & Tunna-vaiska, T. (1996). Paperwork at 78 kph. Proceedings of the CSCW'96 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 370-379. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Boyle, E., Anderson, A., & Newlands, A. (1994). The effects of visibility on dialogue performance in a cooperative problem solving task. Language and Speech, 37, 1-20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). Price, authority and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97-118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bradner, E., Kellogg, W. A., & Erickson, T. (1999). The adoption and use of babble: A field study of chat in the workplace. Proceedings of the ECSCW'99 European Computer-Supported Cooperative Work Conference, 139-158. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Browning, E. S. (1994, May 3). Side by side: Computer chip project brings rivals together, but the cultures clash; Foreign work habits get in the way of creative leaps, hobbling joint research. Softball is not the answer. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Churchill, E., & Bly, S. (1999a). It's all in the words: Supporting work activities with lightweight tools. Proceedings of the GROUP'99, 40-49. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Churchill, E., & Bly, S. (1999b). Virtual environments at work: Ongoing use of MUDs in the workplace. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, 99-108. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: APA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Covi, L. M., Olson, J. S., & Rocco, E. (1998). A room of your own: What do we learn about support of teamwork from assessing teams in dedicated project rooms? In N. Streitz, S. Konomi, & H. J. Burkhardt (Eds.), Cooperative buildings (pp. 53-65). Amsterdam: Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 302-330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In B. Straw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191-223). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Daly-Jones, O., Monk, A., & Watts, L. (1998). Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: Fluency and awareness of attentional focus. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49, 21-58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V., & Henderson, A. (1996). Your place or mine? Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 5 (1), 33-62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dourish, P., & Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed group. Proceedings of the 1992 Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 541-547. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Farmer, S. M., & Hyatt, C.W. (1994). Effects of task language demand and task complexity on computer-mediated work groups. Small Group Research, 25, 331-336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Finholt, T. A., & Olson, G. M. (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science, 8(1), 28-35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Finn, K., Sellen, A., & Wilbur, S. (Eds.). (1997). Video mediated communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., Root, R., & Rice, R. E. (1993). Video as a technology for informal communication. Communications of the ACM, 36, 8-61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Gaver, W. W., Moran, T., MacLean, A., Lovstrand, L., Dourish, P., Carter, K. A., & Buxton, W. (1992). Realizing a video environment: Euro PARC's RAVE system. Proceedings of the CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 27-35. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Grayson, D., & Coventry, L. (1998). The effects of visual proxemic information in video mediated communication. SIGCHI Bulletin, 30 (3), 30-39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hall, E. T. (1966) The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1990). Understanding cultural differences: Germans, French and Americans. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (1993). The seven cultures of capitalism. London: Piatkus.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Handy, C. (1995) Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73 (3), 40-50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1991). Disembodied conduct: Communication through video in a multi-media office environment. Proceedings of the CHI'91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 99-103. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Herbsleb, J. D., Klein, H., Olson, G. M., Brunner, H., Olson, J. S., & Harding, J. (1995). Object-oriented analysis and design in software project teams. Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 249-292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Herbsleb, J. D., & Kuwana, E. (1993). Preserving knowledge in design projects: What designers need to know. Proceedings of the INTERCHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 7-14. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. Proceedings of the CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 119-125. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hymes, C. M., & Olson, G. M. (1992). Unblocking brainstorming through use of a simple group editor. Proceedings of the CSCW'92 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 99-106. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Isaacs, E. A., & Tang, J. C. (1994). What video can and cannot do for collaboration: A case study. Multimedia Systems, 2, 63-73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global teams. Organizational Science, 10, 791-815. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Kovalainen, M., Robinson, M., & Auramaki, E. (1998). Diaries at work. Proceedings of the CSCW'98 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 49-58. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Krauss, R., & Bricker, P. (1967). Effects of transmission delay and access delay on the efficiency of verbal communication. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 286-292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Kraut, R. E., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1990). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaborations. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 149-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Lehner, V. D., & DeFanti, T. A. (1997). Distributed virtual reality: Supporting remote collaboration in vehicle design. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 17 (2), 13-17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A., (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967-985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Mantei, M. M., Baecker, R. M., Sellen, A. J., Buxton, W. A. S., & Mulligan, T. (1991). Experiences in the use of a media space. Proceedings of the 1991 Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 203-208. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Mark, G., Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. E. (1999). Meeting at the desktop: An empirical study of virtually collocated teams. Proceedings of the ECSCW'99, 159-178. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. McDaniel, S. E., Olson, G. M., & McGee, J. C. (1996). Identifying and analyzing multiple threads in computer mediated and face-to-face conversations. Proceedings of the CSCW'96 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 39-47. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. McDaniel, S. E., Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1994). Methods in search of a methodology-combining HCI and object orientation. Proceedings of the CHI'94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 145-151. Boston, MA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Mee, A. (1898). The pleasure telephone. The Strand Magazine, 16, 339-345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper Collins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Nardi, B. A., Kuchinsky, A., Whittaker, S., Leichner, R., & Schwarz, H. (1997). Video-as-data: Technical and social aspects of a collaborative multimedia application. In K. Finn, A. Sellen, & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video mediated communication (pp. 487-518). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Face-to-face: Making network organizations work. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations (pp. 288-308). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. O'Hara-Devereaux, M., & Johansen, R. (1994). Globalwork: Bridging distance, culture and time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Olson, G. M., Atkins, D. E., Clauer, R., Finholt, T. A., Jahanian, F., Killeen, T. L., Prakash, A., & Weymouth, T. (1998). The upper atmospheric research collaboratory. Interactions, 5(3), 48-55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1991). User centered design of collaboration technology. Journal of Organizational Computing, 1, 61-83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1995). The effectiveness of simple shared electronic workspaces. In S. Greenberg, S. Hayne, & R. Rada (Eds.), Real time group drawing and writing tools (pp. 105-126). London: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1997a). Making sense of the findings: Common vocabulary leads to the synthesis necessary for theory building. In K. Finn, A. Sellen, & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video mediated communication (pp. 75-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1997b). Research in computer supported cooperative work. In T. Landauer & M. Helander (Eds.), Handbook of human computer interaction (pp. 1433-1457). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Olson, G. M., Olson, J. S., Carter, M., & Storrøøsten, M. (1992). Small group design meetings: An analysis of collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 347-374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Olson, G. M., Olson, J. S., Storrøsten, M., Carter, M., Herbsleb, J., & Rueter, H. (1995). The structure of activity during design meetings. In J. Carroll & T. Moran (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use (pp. 217-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Olson, J. S., Covi, L., Rocco, E., Miller, W. J., & Allie, P. (1998). A room of your own: What would it take to help remote groups work as well as collocated groups? Proceedings of the CHI'98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 279-280. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Olson, J. S., & Olson, G. M. (1999). Computer-supported cooperative work. In F. Durso (Ed.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 409-442). New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Meader, D. K. (1995). What mix of video and audio is useful for remote real-time work? Proceedings of the CHI'95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 362-368. Denver, CO: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Meader, D. (1997). Face-to-face group work compared to remote group work with and without video. In K. Finn, A. Sellen, & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video mediated communication (pp. 152-172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Storrøsten, M., & Carter, M. (1992). How a group-editor changes the character of a design meeting as well as its outcome. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 91-98. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Storrøsten, M., & Carter, M. (1993). Group work close up: A comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor. ACM: Transactions on Information Systems, 11, 321-348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Olson, J. S., & Teasley, S. (1996). Groupware in the wild: Lessons learned from a year of virtual collocation. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 419-427. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Olson, M. H., & Bly, S. A. (1991). The Portland experience: A report on a distributed research group. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 211-228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Orlikowski,W. (1992). Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 362-369. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Pool, I. S. (Ed.). (1977). The social impact of the telephone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Riez, R. R., & Klemmer, E. T. (1963). Subjective evaluation of delay and echo suppressers in telephone communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 4, 2919-2942.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Rocco, E. (1998). Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact. Proceedings of the CHI'98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 496-502. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1994). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Proceedings of the CSCW'94 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 253-264. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Tang, J. C., & Isaacs, E. A. (1993). Why do users like video? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 163-196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Tang, J. C., Isaacs, E. A., & Rua, M. (1994). Supporting distributed groups with a montage of lightweight interactions. Proceeding of the CSCW'94 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 23-34. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. van Alstyne, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Widening access and narrowing focus: Could the Internet balkanize science? Science, 274, 1479-1480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Veinott, E., Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Fu, X. (1999). Video helps remote work: Speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 302-309. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Watts, L. A., & Monk, A. F. (1998). Reasoning about tasks, activities and technology to support collaboration. Ergonomics, 41, 1583-1606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Weick, K. E. (1976). The social psychology of organizing. New York: Random House. Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (1995). Back to the future: Pen and paper technology supports complex group coordination. Proceedings of the CHI'95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 495-502. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Williams, G. (1997). Task conflict and language differences: Opportunities for videoconferencing. Proceedings of the ECSCW'97, 97-108. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229-239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Distance matters

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Human-Computer Interaction
          Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 15, Issue 2
          September 2000
          191 pages
          ISSN:0737-0024
          EISSN:1532-7051
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Publisher

          L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.

          United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 September 2000
          • Revised: 28 April 2000
          • Received: 17 August 1999

          Qualifiers

          • article