Abstract
Giant strides in information technology at the turn of the century may have unleashed unreachable goals. With the invention of groupware, people expect to communicate easily with each other and accomplish difficult work even though they are remotely located or rarely overlap in time. Major corporations launch global teams, expecting that technology will make "virtual collocation" possible. Federal research money encourages global science through the establishment of "collaboratories." We review over 10 years of field and laboratory investigations of collocated and noncollocated synchronous group collaborations. In particular, we compare collocated work with remote work as it is possible today and comment on the promise of remote work tomorrow. We focus on the sociotechnical conditions required for effective distance work and bring together the results with four key concepts: common ground, coupling of work, collaboration readiness, and collaboration technology readiness. Groups with high common ground and loosely coupled work, with readiness both for collaboration and collaboration technology, have a chance at succeeding with remote work. Deviations from each of these create strain on the relationships among teammates and require changes in the work or processes of collaboration to succeed. Often they do not succeed because distance still matters.
- Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Auramaki, E., Robinson, M., Aaltonen, A., Kovalainen, M., Liinamaa, A., & Tunna-vaiska, T. (1996). Paperwork at 78 kph. Proceedings of the CSCW'96 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 370-379. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boyle, E., Anderson, A., & Newlands, A. (1994). The effects of visibility on dialogue performance in a cooperative problem solving task. Language and Speech, 37, 1-20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). Price, authority and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97-118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bradner, E., Kellogg, W. A., & Erickson, T. (1999). The adoption and use of babble: A field study of chat in the workplace. Proceedings of the ECSCW'99 European Computer-Supported Cooperative Work Conference, 139-158. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Browning, E. S. (1994, May 3). Side by side: Computer chip project brings rivals together, but the cultures clash; Foreign work habits get in the way of creative leaps, hobbling joint research. Softball is not the answer. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.Google Scholar
- Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Churchill, E., & Bly, S. (1999a). It's all in the words: Supporting work activities with lightweight tools. Proceedings of the GROUP'99, 40-49. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Churchill, E., & Bly, S. (1999b). Virtual environments at work: Ongoing use of MUDs in the workplace. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, 99-108. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
- Covi, L. M., Olson, J. S., & Rocco, E. (1998). A room of your own: What do we learn about support of teamwork from assessing teams in dedicated project rooms? In N. Streitz, S. Konomi, & H. J. Burkhardt (Eds.), Cooperative buildings (pp. 53-65). Amsterdam: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 302-330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In B. Straw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191-223). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
- Daly-Jones, O., Monk, A., & Watts, L. (1998). Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: Fluency and awareness of attentional focus. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49, 21-58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V., & Henderson, A. (1996). Your place or mine? Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 5 (1), 33-62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P., & Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed group. Proceedings of the 1992 Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 541-547. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Farmer, S. M., & Hyatt, C.W. (1994). Effects of task language demand and task complexity on computer-mediated work groups. Small Group Research, 25, 331-336.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Finholt, T. A., & Olson, G. M. (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science, 8(1), 28-35.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Finn, K., Sellen, A., & Wilbur, S. (Eds.). (1997). Video mediated communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., Root, R., & Rice, R. E. (1993). Video as a technology for informal communication. Communications of the ACM, 36, 8-61. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver, W. W., Moran, T., MacLean, A., Lovstrand, L., Dourish, P., Carter, K. A., & Buxton, W. (1992). Realizing a video environment: Euro PARC's RAVE system. Proceedings of the CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 27-35. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grayson, D., & Coventry, L. (1998). The effects of visual proxemic information in video mediated communication. SIGCHI Bulletin, 30 (3), 30-39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hall, E. T. (1966) The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1990). Understanding cultural differences: Germans, French and Americans. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
- Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (1993). The seven cultures of capitalism. London: Piatkus.Google Scholar
- Handy, C. (1995) Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73 (3), 40-50.Google Scholar
- Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1991). Disembodied conduct: Communication through video in a multi-media office environment. Proceedings of the CHI'91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 99-103. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herbsleb, J. D., Klein, H., Olson, G. M., Brunner, H., Olson, J. S., & Harding, J. (1995). Object-oriented analysis and design in software project teams. Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 249-292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herbsleb, J. D., & Kuwana, E. (1993). Preserving knowledge in design projects: What designers need to know. Proceedings of the INTERCHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 7-14. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. Proceedings of the CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 119-125. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hymes, C. M., & Olson, G. M. (1992). Unblocking brainstorming through use of a simple group editor. Proceedings of the CSCW'92 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 99-106. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Isaacs, E. A., & Tang, J. C. (1994). What video can and cannot do for collaboration: A case study. Multimedia Systems, 2, 63-73. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global teams. Organizational Science, 10, 791-815. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kovalainen, M., Robinson, M., & Auramaki, E. (1998). Diaries at work. Proceedings of the CSCW'98 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 49-58. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krauss, R., & Bricker, P. (1967). Effects of transmission delay and access delay on the efficiency of verbal communication. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 286-292.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kraut, R. E., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1990). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaborations. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 149-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Google Scholar
- Lehner, V. D., & DeFanti, T. A. (1997). Distributed virtual reality: Supporting remote collaboration in vehicle design. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 17 (2), 13-17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A., (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967-985.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mantei, M. M., Baecker, R. M., Sellen, A. J., Buxton, W. A. S., & Mulligan, T. (1991). Experiences in the use of a media space. Proceedings of the 1991 Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 203-208. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark, G., Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. E. (1999). Meeting at the desktop: An empirical study of virtually collocated teams. Proceedings of the ECSCW'99, 159-178. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McDaniel, S. E., Olson, G. M., & McGee, J. C. (1996). Identifying and analyzing multiple threads in computer mediated and face-to-face conversations. Proceedings of the CSCW'96 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 39-47. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McDaniel, S. E., Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1994). Methods in search of a methodology-combining HCI and object orientation. Proceedings of the CHI'94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 145-151. Boston, MA: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mee, A. (1898). The pleasure telephone. The Strand Magazine, 16, 339-345.Google Scholar
- Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Nardi, B. A., Kuchinsky, A., Whittaker, S., Leichner, R., & Schwarz, H. (1997). Video-as-data: Technical and social aspects of a collaborative multimedia application. In K. Finn, A. Sellen, & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video mediated communication (pp. 487-518). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Face-to-face: Making network organizations work. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations (pp. 288-308). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- O'Hara-Devereaux, M., & Johansen, R. (1994). Globalwork: Bridging distance, culture and time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Olson, G. M., Atkins, D. E., Clauer, R., Finholt, T. A., Jahanian, F., Killeen, T. L., Prakash, A., & Weymouth, T. (1998). The upper atmospheric research collaboratory. Interactions, 5(3), 48-55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1991). User centered design of collaboration technology. Journal of Organizational Computing, 1, 61-83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1995). The effectiveness of simple shared electronic workspaces. In S. Greenberg, S. Hayne, & R. Rada (Eds.), Real time group drawing and writing tools (pp. 105-126). London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1997a). Making sense of the findings: Common vocabulary leads to the synthesis necessary for theory building. In K. Finn, A. Sellen, & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video mediated communication (pp. 75-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1997b). Research in computer supported cooperative work. In T. Landauer & M. Helander (Eds.), Handbook of human computer interaction (pp. 1433-1457). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Olson, G. M., Olson, J. S., Carter, M., & Storrøøsten, M. (1992). Small group design meetings: An analysis of collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 347-374.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, G. M., Olson, J. S., Storrøsten, M., Carter, M., Herbsleb, J., & Rueter, H. (1995). The structure of activity during design meetings. In J. Carroll & T. Moran (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use (pp. 217-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Google Scholar
- Olson, J. S., Covi, L., Rocco, E., Miller, W. J., & Allie, P. (1998). A room of your own: What would it take to help remote groups work as well as collocated groups? Proceedings of the CHI'98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 279-280. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, J. S., & Olson, G. M. (1999). Computer-supported cooperative work. In F. Durso (Ed.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 409-442). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Meader, D. K. (1995). What mix of video and audio is useful for remote real-time work? Proceedings of the CHI'95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 362-368. Denver, CO: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Meader, D. (1997). Face-to-face group work compared to remote group work with and without video. In K. Finn, A. Sellen, & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video mediated communication (pp. 152-172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Storrøsten, M., & Carter, M. (1992). How a group-editor changes the character of a design meeting as well as its outcome. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 91-98. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Storrøsten, M., & Carter, M. (1993). Group work close up: A comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor. ACM: Transactions on Information Systems, 11, 321-348. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, J. S., & Teasley, S. (1996). Groupware in the wild: Lessons learned from a year of virtual collocation. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 419-427. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, M. H., & Bly, S. A. (1991). The Portland experience: A report on a distributed research group. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 211-228. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Orlikowski,W. (1992). Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 362-369. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pool, I. S. (Ed.). (1977). The social impact of the telephone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Riez, R. R., & Klemmer, E. T. (1963). Subjective evaluation of delay and echo suppressers in telephone communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 4, 2919-2942.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rocco, E. (1998). Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact. Proceedings of the CHI'98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 496-502. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1994). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Proceedings of the CSCW'94 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 253-264. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tang, J. C., & Isaacs, E. A. (1993). Why do users like video? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 163-196.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tang, J. C., Isaacs, E. A., & Rua, M. (1994). Supporting distributed groups with a montage of lightweight interactions. Proceeding of the CSCW'94 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 23-34. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
- van Alstyne, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Widening access and narrowing focus: Could the Internet balkanize science? Science, 274, 1479-1480.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Veinott, E., Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Fu, X. (1999). Video helps remote work: Speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 302-309. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Watts, L. A., & Monk, A. F. (1998). Reasoning about tasks, activities and technology to support collaboration. Ergonomics, 41, 1583-1606.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weick, K. E. (1976). The social psychology of organizing. New York: Random House. Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (1995). Back to the future: Pen and paper technology supports complex group coordination. Proceedings of the CHI'95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 495-502. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Williams, G. (1997). Task conflict and language differences: Opportunities for videoconferencing. Proceedings of the ECSCW'97, 97-108. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229-239.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Distance matters
Recommendations
Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception
CSCW '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative workIn this study, we examine how geographic distance affects collaboration using computer-mediated communication technology. We investigated experimentally the effects of cooperating partners being in the same or distant city on three behaviors: ...
A "Distance Matters" Paradox: Facilitating Intra-Team Collaboration Can Harm Inter-Team Collaboration
CSCW1By identifying the socio-technical conditions required for teams to work effectively remotely, the Distance Matters framework has been influential in CSCW since its introduction in 2000. Advances in collaboration technology and practices have since ...
Measuring Awareness in Cross-Team Collaborations -- Distance Matters
ICGSE '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software EngineeringDeveloping and maintaining team awareness within and across teams working in the same project helps team members in aligning their activities and facilitates implicit coordination. This requires both task and presence awareness. In this paper, we share ...
Comments