skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

Real-World Concurrency: In this look at how concurrency affects practitioners in the real world, Cantrill and Bonwick argue that much of the anxiety over concurrency is unwarranted.

Published:01 September 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Software practitioners today could be forgiven if recent microprocessor developments have given them some trepidation about the future of software. While Moore’s law continues to hold (that is, transistor density continues to double roughly every 18 months), as a result of both intractable physical limitations and practical engineering considerations, that increasing density is no longer being spent on boosting clock rate. Instead, it is being used to put multiple CPU cores on a single CPU die. From the software perspective, this is not a revolutionary shift, but rather an evolutionary one: multicore CPUs are not the birthing of a new paradigm, but rather the progression of an old one (multiprocessing) into more widespread deployment.

References

  1. Sutter, H., Larus, J. 2005. Software and the concurrency revolution. ACM Queue 3(7): 54-62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. DeWitt, D., Gray, J. 1992. Parallel database systems: the future of high-performance database systems. Communications of the ACM 35(6): 85-98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Oskin, M. 2008. The revolution inside the box. Communications of the ACM 51(7): 70-78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barroso, L. A., Gharachorloo, K., McNamara, R., Nowatzyk, A., Qadeer, S., Sano, B., Smith, S., Stets, R., Verghese, B. 2000. Piranha: a scalable architecture based on single-chip multiprocessing. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture: 282-293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shavit, N. 2008. Transactions are tomorrow's loads and stores. Communications of the ACM 51(8): 90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cantrill, B. 2006. Hidden in plain sight. ACM Queue 4(1): 26-36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. McKusick, K. A. 2006. A conversation with Jarod Jenson. ACM Queue 4(1): 16-24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cantrill, B. 2003. Postmortem object type identification. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Automated Debugging.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Peyton Jones, S. 2007. Beautiful concurrency. In Beautiful Code, ed. A. Oram and G. Wilson. Cambridge, MA: O'Reilly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. See reference 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cantrill, B. 2007. A spoonful of sewage. In Beautiful Code, ed. A. Oram and G. Wilson. Cambridge, MA: O'Reilly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. See reference 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Real-World Concurrency: In this look at how concurrency affects practitioners in the real world, Cantrill and Bonwick argue that much of the anxiety over concurrency is unwarranted.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Queue
          Queue  Volume 6, Issue 5
          The Concurrency Problem
          September 2008
          58 pages
          ISSN:1542-7730
          EISSN:1542-7749
          DOI:10.1145/1454456
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 September 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Popular
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format