skip to main content
10.1145/1453805.1453817acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuxtvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Innovation for inclusive design: an approach to exploring the iDTV design space

Published:22 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes an approach to the elicitation of accessibility requirements both to improve the design of existing technologies and develop new DTV utilities. The approach builds on previous work in which stalking-horse prototypes were used to explore possible design enhancements to interactive TV facilities. We describe a model of interaction with iDTV facilities that can be used to isolate areas of a design where those with impairments are likely to have difficulties and need alternative of modified design features. This incorporates a model of recovery strategies deployed during interactive sequences. The later section describes a creative technique for follow-up analyses of prototype evaluations. The technique is aimed at participatory exercises in which subjects are exposed to prototype designs or scenarios and encouraged to contribute ideas for re-designs and novel applications.

References

  1. Card, S . Moran, T. and Newell, A.1983. The Psychology of Human Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 0-89859-859-1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Carroll, J. and Kellogg, W. 1989. Artefact as theory-nexus: Hermeneutics meets Theory-based design', Proceedings of CHI'89, Human Factors in Computer Systems, ACM press, 7--14 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Carroll, J. and Rosson, M. B. 1992. Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario. ACM transactions on information systems, Vol 10, No 2, 181--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eberle, R.: SCAMPER, 1997, Prufrock Press, ISBN: 1882664248Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. 1993. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. French, T. S., and Springett, M. 2003. Developing novel iTV applications: a user centric view, in J. Masthoff, R. Griffiths, & L. Pemberton (Eds.), First European Conference on iTV, http://www.brighton.ac.uk/interactive/euroitv/euroitv03/Proceedings.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaver, W. Boucher, A. Pennington, S. and walker, B. 2004. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty, in Interactions, 11, 53-56, ISSN:1072-5520 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Maiden, N. and Rugg, G. 1996. ACRE: Selecting methods for requirements acquisition. Software Engineering Journal, May pp 183--192Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Michalko, M. 1994. Thinkpak, Ten Speed Press; ISBN: 1-58008-772-8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Moonan, k. 2007. Accessibility & the challenges of Web 2.0, user generated content and the social networking revolution, Presentation to the UK Usability Professionals Association, London. http://www.ukupa.org.uk/events/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Newell, A. and Gregor, P. 2000. User sensitive inclusive design in search of a new paradigm, in Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability, 39-44, ACM, ISBN:1-58113-314-6 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Newell, A., Morgan. M, and Carmichael, A. 2007, The efficacy of narrative video for raising awareness in ICT designers about older users' requirements, Interacting with Computers, l19, Elsevier, 587--596. doi.10.1016/j.intcom.2007.06.001. ISSN: 0953 5438 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Norman, D. A. 1986, Cognitive Engineering. In Norman D. A. & Draper S. W. {Eds.}:User-Centered System Design: New perspectives in human-computer interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pemberton, L. and Fallahkhair, S. 2007. "Interactive television as a Medium for Language Learning" in Interactive Digital Television: Technologies and 57 Applications, G. Lekakos, K. Chorianopolous and G. Doukidis (eds), IGI Press, ISBN 978-159904361-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rasmussen, J. 1986. Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Reason, J. 1990. Human Error, Barnes & Noble, ISBN: 0521314194Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sourbati, M. 2008. Digital TV, the interactive promise and social inclusion. The UK case., In Proceedings of Digital Television Revisited: Linking users, markets and Policies, COST Action 298, 204--212, ISBN 978-963-06-4916-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Springett M. 1992. The Utility of Design Actions Models for Direct Manipulation design. In Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction. J.Larson & C. Unger (Eds), Elsevier Science Publishers BV (North-Holland). IFIP . ACM Digital Library http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfmid=647103.717566&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=67669286&CFTOKEN=96643862 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Springett, M. 1998. Linking Surface error Characteristics to deep usability Problems; in Proc. AVI'98, Working conference on advanced Visual Interfaces, ACM press. ACM Digital Library: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm id=948512&dl=ACM&coll=ACM&CFID=67669286&CFTOKEN=96643862 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Springett M. and Griffiths R. 2007. The use of stalking-horse evaluation prototypes for probing DTV accessibility requirements, in, Interactive Digital Television: technologies and applications, IGI press, ISBN-10: 1599043610Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Turk, T. Sapio, B., Cornaccia, M. Livi, S. Nicolo, E. and Papa, F. 2008. Microsimulating the Adoption of Digital Television and T-Government Services, In Proceedings of Digital Television Revisited: Linking users, markets and Policies, COST Action 298, 3-14, ISBN 978-963-06-4916-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wright, P., Fields, B. and Harrison. M. 1994. Deriving human error tolerance requirements from tasks. In First International Conference on Requirements Engineering. IEEEGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Innovation for inclusive design: an approach to exploring the iDTV design space

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UXTV '08: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video
        October 2008
        210 pages
        ISBN:9781605581002
        DOI:10.1145/1453805

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 October 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader