skip to main content
10.1145/1435523.1435527acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseurosysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ExoSnap: a modular approach to semantic synchronization and snapshots

Published:01 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Current approaches to application-specific synchronization suffer from a limitation that precludes the use of generic "commodity" servers because they require to run the type-specific synchronization code at the servers. This is a problem for "cloud computing" systems that must rely on commodity components to exploit economies of scale yet need to adapt to application needs to provide good performance. We describe a new approach that overcomes the limitation. The new approach splits the synchronization code, so that the type-specific code runs outside the server, on the client side, and the generic performance-critical code runs in the server. New type-specific synchronization protocols can be developed without modifying the servers, providing the ability to use commodity servers.

References

  1. A. Adya, R. Gruber, B. Liskov, and U. Maheshwari. Efficient optimistic concurrency control using loosely synchronized clocks. In SIGMOD '95: Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 23--34, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. R. Badrinath and K. Ramamritham. Semantics-based concurrency control: beyond commutativity. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 17(1), 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Barbará-Millá and H. Garcia-Molina. The demarcation protocol: a technique for maintaining constraints in distributed database systems. The VLDB Journal, 3(3):325--353, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Berenson, P. Bernstein, J. Gray, J. Melton, E. O'Neil, and P. O'Neil. A critique of ansi sql isolation levels. In Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, San Jose, California, United States, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W. Binder, S. Spicher, I. Constantinescu, and B. Baitings. Evaluation of multiversion concurrency control for web service directory. In Proceedings of International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007), Salt Lake City, Utah, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. Graefe and M. J. Zwilling. Transaction support for indexed views. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Conference, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Gray and A. Reuter. Transaction Processing: Concepts and Techniques. 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Greenfield, A. Fekete, J. Jang, D. Kuo, and S. Nepal. Isolation support for service-based applications: A position paper. In Proceedings of Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR'07), Asilomar, CA, January 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Herlihy. Replication methods for abstract data types. Technical Report MIT/LCS/TR-319, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Kumar and M. Stonebraker. Semantics based transaction management techniques for replicated data. ACM SIGMOD Record, 17(3):117--125, June 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Liskov, M. Castro, L. Shrira, and A. Adya. Providing persistent objects in distributed systems. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP), Lisbon, Portugal, June 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Liskov and R. Rodrigues. Transactional file systems can be fast. In 11th ACM SIGOPS European Workshop, Leuven, Belgium, Sept. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. B. Lomet. Mlr: a recovery method for multi-level systems. In SIGMOD '92: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Ni, V. S. Menon, A.-R. Adl-Tabatabai, A. L. Hosking, R. L. Hudson, J. E. B. Moss, B. Saha, and T. Shpeisman. Open nesting in software transactional memory. In PPoPP '07: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. O'Neil. The escrow transaction method. ACM Transactions Database Systems, 11(4):406--430, June 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. Ozsoyoglu and R. Snodgrass. Temporal and Real-Time Databases: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Knoweldge and Data Engineering, 7(4):513--532, August 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. F. Prez-Sorrosal, M. Patino-Martinez, R. Jimenez-Peris, and J. Vuckovic. Highly available long running transactions and activities for j2ee applications. In ICDCS '06: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, page 2, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. L. Shrira, C. van Ingen, and R. Shaull. Time travel in the virtualized past: cheap fares and first class seats. In Wirtualization Workshop, Haifa Systems and Storage Conference, Haifa, Israel, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. L. Shrira and H. Xu. Snap: a non-disruptive snapshot system. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G. D. Walborn and P. K. Chrysanthis. Supporting semantics-based transaction processing in mobile database applications. In Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, pages 31--40, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. W. E. Weihl. Local Atomicity Properties: Modular Concurrency Control for Abstract Data Types. ACM TOPLAS, 11(2):249--283, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Weikum. A theoretical foundation of multi-level concurrency control. In PODS '86: Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD symposium on Principles of database systems, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ExoSnap: a modular approach to semantic synchronization and snapshots

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              WDDDM '08: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Dependable distributed data management
              April 2008
              39 pages
              ISBN:9781605581217
              DOI:10.1145/1435523

              Copyright © 2008 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 April 2008

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader