skip to main content
10.1145/1413634.1413700acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdimeaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Distributed collective practices in collaborative music performance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper reports on the design of a prototype system to facilitate intertwining of on-line and off-line practices during collaborative networked music master classes. Our approach links with recent theoretical thinking inspired from the concept of communities of practice and aims to devise a system to provide a virtual 'place' for engaging in the practice the community is about. This implies a focus not only on community management (i.e., discovering, building, maintaining community) but also on constructing and reconstructing practice using a suitable interactive practice vocabulary. We demonstrate the challenges involved in building domain-specific, practice-oriented interactive vocabularies for collaborative music lessons and report on our recent experiences on the interplay between on-line and off-line practice.

References

  1. Frith, S. and Goodwin, A. (eds.) 1990. On Record: Rock, Pop and The Written Word, London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and von Savigny E. 2001. The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lave, J., and Wegner, E. 1991. Situated Learning -- Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Orlikowski, J. W. 2002. Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing, Organization Science, 13 (3), pp. 249--273. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jarzabkowski, P. 2005. Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. London: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Schmidt, K. 2000. Distributed Collective Practices: A CSCW Perspective', Invited Talk, Conference on Distributed Collective Practices, September 19--22, Paris, France 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Schmidt, K., Wagner, I., and Tolar, M. 2007. Permutations of cooperative work practices: A study of two oncology clinics, in T. Gross, et al. (eds.): GROUP 2007: Proceedings of the International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 4--7 November 2007, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, ACM Press, New York, 2007, pp. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Engeström, Y. 1999. Activity theory and individual and social transformation' in Perspectives on activity theory. Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen and R. L. Punamäki (eds), 19--38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ducheneaut, N., Moore, R. J., Oehlberg, L., Thornton, J. D., and Nickell, E. 2008. SocialTV: Designing for distributed, social television viewing, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. 2000. The Social Life of Information, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Duguid, P. 2005. The art of knowing -- Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice, The Information Society, 21 pp. 109--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wasko, Molly M., Faraj, S. 2005. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Management Information Systems Quarterly 29(1), pp. 35--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Vaast, E. 2004. O brother, where are thou? From communities to networks of practice through intranet use. Management Communication Quarterly 18(1), pp. 5--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Barnes, B. 2001. Practices as collective action, in {2}, pp. 17--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gasser, L., and Ripoche, G. 2003. Distributed collective practices and free/open source software problem management: perspectives and methods. Conference on Cooperation, Innovation & Technologie (CITE'03), Universitéé de Technologie de Troyes, France, December 3--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Scacchi, W. 2005. Socio-Technical Interaction Networks in Free/Open Source Software Development Processes, in Silvia T. Acuna and Natalia Juristo (eds), Software Process Modelling, pp. 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Scacchi, W., Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Hissam, S., and Lakhani, K. 2006. Understanding Free/Open Source Software Development Processes. Software Process -- Improvement and Practice, 11(2), pp. 95--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. von Hippel, E., and Katz, R. 2002. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7), 821--833. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Schultz, F., and Pucher, H. F. 2003. www.deck - Wissensmanagement bei Volkswagen. Industrie Management, 19 (3), pp. 64--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ackerman, M. S. 1998. Augmenting organizational memory: a field study of Answer Garden, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16(3), pp. 203--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Olson, G., and Olson, J. 2000. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2--3), pp. 139--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Erickson, T., and Kellogg, W. 2001. Knowledge Communities: Online Environments for Supporting Knowledge Management and its Social Context, in Ackerman, M., Volkmar, P., and Wulf, V. (eds.) Beyond Knowledge Management: Sharing Expertise, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 299--325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Detienne, F. 2006. Collaborative design: Managing task interdependencies and multiple perspectives, Interacting with Computers 18, pp. 1--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Preece, J. 2000. Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Chichester, England: John Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Turner, W., Bowker, G., Gasser, L., and Zacklad, M. 2006. Information Infrastructures for Distributed Collective Practices, Comp. Sup. Cooperative Work, 15, pp. 93--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S. and Roseman, M. 1996. Workspace Awareness in Real-Time Distributed Groupware: Framework, Widgets, and Evaluation. In A. Sasse, R. J. Cunningham, and R. Winder (eds), People and Computers XI. Springer-Verlag, pp. 281--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Smith, I, and Hudson, E. S. 1995. Low Disturbance Audio for Awareness and Privacy in Media Space Applications. In Proc. of ACM Multimedia '95, ACM Press, pp. 91--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Schmidt, K. 2002. The problem with 'awareness', Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, pp. 285--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Convertino, G., and Ganoe, H. C. 2006. Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations, Interacting with Computers 18, pp. 21--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Alexandraki, C., and Kalantzis, I. 2007. Requirements and Application Scenarios in the Context of Network Based Music Collaboration, Proceedings of the AXMEDIS 2007 Conference. i-maestro workshop, Barcelona, Spain, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Distributed collective practices in collaborative music performance

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIMEA '08: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts
      September 2008
      551 pages
      ISBN:9781605582481
      DOI:10.1145/1413634

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 September 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIMEA '08 Paper Acceptance Rate59of77submissions,77%Overall Acceptance Rate59of77submissions,77%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader