skip to main content
10.1145/1394445.1394476acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The iterative design of a project charter for interdisciplinary research

Published:25 February 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes our experience with the iterative development and use of a project charter for helping to manage expectations of the various members of interdisciplinary research teams. Some of our team members may be working with other researchers for the first time, and many of them have not worked previously with researchers from other disciplines. The charter is based on the need to explicitly discuss principles and policies of research practice with people from different disciplines at the start of the project, and to have a common agreement to refer to if necessary during the project. Our current template contains the following principles:

• We are interested in disseminating the results of this project as widely as possible, with credit to us for doing it.

• We intend this work to move forward at a steady pace, given due awareness of the vagaries of life.

• We would prefer for this work to be funded.

• We understand that the work we do on this project may have future phases. Modifications and additions may be made to further the project by other members.

• We wish to communicate in such a way as to preserve professional dignity.

• We would like to foster goodwill among all the participants.

Although these seem on the surface like motherhood statements that would go without saying, in practical terms these principles, and the longer list of policies that emerge from them, is actually the basis of fundamental misunderstandings between disciplines.

References

  1. Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S.-L. & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003) An Emerging View of Scientific Collaboration: Scientists' Perspectives on Collaboration and Factors that Impact Collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 54(10), 952--965. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. SSHRC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada). (2007). International Collaboration. Retrieved June 30, 2007 from http://www.sshrc.ca/web/whatsnew/initiatives/international/index_e.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ruecker, S. (2006). "Experimental Interfaces Involving Visual Grouping During Browsing." Partnership: the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research. 1(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Radzikowska, M., Ruecker, S., Fiorentino, C., and Michura, P. (2007). The Novel as Slot Machine. Paper presented at the Society for Digital Humanities (SDH/SEMI) conference. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. May 28--30, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Svensson, P. (2003). Interdisciplinary Design Research. In B. Laurel (Ed.), Design Research: Methods and Perspectives (193--200). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P. W., Marsh, M. & Kramer, S. J. (2001). Academic-Practitioner Collaboration in Management Research: A Case of Cross-Profession Collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 418--431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wynne, S., Ruecker, S., Nelson, T. M., Albakry, W., Strong, M., Lewcio, M., and Plouffe, M. (2007). The rich prospect of tension, affiliation and reward: from social capital to image analysis. Paper presented at the Society for Digital Humanities (SDH/SEMI) conference. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. May 28--30, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zimmerman, E. (2003). Play as Research: The iterative design process. In B. Laurel (Ed.), Design Research: Methods and Perspectives (176--184). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett, N. & Kidwell Jr., R. E. (2001). The Provision of Effort in Self-Designing Work Groups: The Case of Collaborative Research. Small Group Research, 32(6), 727--744.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Rockwell, G. and Johnson, N. (2007). The Globalization Compendium: Reflecting on Contemporary Research and Online Publication. Paper presented at the Society for Digital Humanities (SDH/SEMI) conference. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. May 28--30, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuneo, C. (2003). Interdisciplinary Teams - Let's Make Them Work. University Affairs. 1(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sillitoe, P. Interdisciplinary Experiences: Working with Indigenous Knowledge in Development. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 29, 1, (March 2004), 6--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Schuler, D, & Clement, A. (2004). Artful integration and participatory design: Preface to the proceedings of PDC 2004. In Clement, A., van den Besselaar, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design (1st ed., pp. v-vi). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobson, S. (nd) Case Studies in Gerontology for the Applied Health Sciences. Retrieved July 17, 2007, from http://publish.uwo.ca/~shobson/models.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilson, V and Pirrie, A. (2000). Multidisciplinary Teamworking Indicators of Good Practice. The Scottish Council for Research in Education Research Report, 77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang, S., Zhao, C., Zhang, Q, Su, H., Guo, H., Cui, J., Pan, Y. and Moody, P. (2007). Managing Collaborative Activities in Project Management. Proceedings of the 2007 symposium on Computer Human Interaction for the Management of Information Technology (CHIMIT '07). March 30--31, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Seipel, M. (2005). Interdisciplinarity: An Introduction. Retrieved July 22, 2007, from http://www2.truman.edu/~mseipel/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Keil, M., Smith, J., Pawlowski, S. and Jin, L. (2004). Why Didn't Somebody Tell Me?: Climate, information asymmetry, and bad news about troubled projects. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(2), 65--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The iterative design of a project charter for interdisciplinary research

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '08: Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems
      February 2008
      487 pages
      ISBN:9781605580029
      DOI:10.1145/1394445

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader