skip to main content
10.1145/1379092.1379114acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

We're all stars now: reality television, web 2.0, and mediated identities

Published:19 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social cognitive theory suggests a likely relationship between the rising popularity of both reality television and social networking sites. This research utilized a survey (N=456) of young adults to determine the extent to which reality television consumption explains user behavior in the context of social network sites. Results show a consistent relationship between reality television consumption on the length of time spent logged on to these sites, the size of user's networks, the proportion of friends not actually met face to face, and photo sharing frequency while controlling for age, gender and education. Other categories of television viewing like news, fiction, and educational programming were not related to user's online behavior.

References

  1. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. 2001. Social Cognitive Theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. 1977. Social learning and personality development. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston: London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow, J. P. 1996. February 8. A declaration of the rights of cyberspace. Retrieved February 11, 2008 from http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bente, G. & Feist, A. 2000. Affect-Talk and its kin. In Zillman, D. & Vorderer, P. (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal, p. 113--134. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. boyd, d., & Heer, J. 2006. Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster. Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Calvert, C. 2000. Voyeur nation: Media, privacy and peering in modern culture. Westview Press: Boulder, CO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dominick, J. R. 1984. Videogames, Television Violence, and Aggression in Teenagers. Journal of Communication, 34, 2, 136--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ferris, A. L., Smith, S. W., Greenberg, B. S., & Smith, S. L. 2007. The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of Communication, 57, 490--510.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hill, A. 2005. Reality TV: Audiences and popular factual television. Routledge: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, S. 1995. Patchwork Girl. Eastgate Systems. Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. McCraken, G. 1989. Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 3, 310--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. McGhee, P. E., & Frueh, T. 1980. Television viewing and the learning of sex-role stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6, 179--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Shanahan, J., Scheufele, D. A., Yang, F., & Hizi, S. 2004. Cultivation and spiral of silence effects: The case of smoking. Mass Communication & Society, 7, 4, 413--428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Walther, J. B. 2007. Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538--2557. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wakefield, M., Flay, B. R., Nichter M., & Giovino, G. 2003. Role of media in influencing trajectories of youth smoking. Addiction, 98, 79--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Weinberger, D. 2001, December 1. Weblog Stat Quotations. Joho the Blog. Retrieved February 8, 2007 from http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/archive/2001_12_01_archive.html#8043585Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. We're all stars now: reality television, web 2.0, and mediated identities

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HT '08: Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia
        June 2008
        268 pages
        ISBN:9781595939852
        DOI:10.1145/1379092

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 June 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        HT '08 Paper Acceptance Rate23of69submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate378of1,158submissions,33%

        Upcoming Conference

        HT '24
        35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
        September 10 - 13, 2024
        Poznan , Poland

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader