skip to main content
10.1145/1378773.1378798acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Seeing is retrieving: building information context from what the user sees

Published:13 January 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

As the user's document and application workspace grows more diverse, supporting personal information management becomes increasingly important. This trend toward diversity renders it difficult to implement systems which are tailored to specific applications, file types, or other information sources.

We developed SeeTrieve, a personal document retrieval and classification system which abstracts applications by considering only the text they present to the user through the user interface. Associating the visible text which surrounds a document in time, SeeTrieve is able to identify important information about the task within which a document is used. This context enables novel, useful ways for users to retrieve their personal documents. When compared to content based systems, this context based retrieval achieved substantial improvements in document recall.

References

  1. R. A. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. K. Barreau. Context as a factor in personal information management systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(5):327--339, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Bauer and D. Leake. Using document access sequences to recommend customized information. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 17(6):27--33, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Blanc-Brude and D. L. Scapin. What do people recall about their documents? Implications for desktop search tools. In IUI '07, pages 102--111, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Budzik and K. J. Hammond. User interactions with everyday applications as context for just-in-time information access. In IUI '00, pages 44--51, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Chirita, C. S. Firan, and W. Nejdl. Personalized query expansion for the web. In SIGIR '07, pages 7--14, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Cutrell, S. T. Dumais, and J. Teevan. Searching to eliminate personal information management. Commun. ACM, 49(1):58--64, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Google Desktop. http://desktop.google.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yahoo! Desktop. http://desktop.yahoo.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Dumais, E. Cutrell, JJ Cadiz, G. Jancke, R. Sarin, and D. C. Robbins. Stuff I've seen: a system for personal information retrieval and re-use. In SIGIR '03, pages 72--79, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Elsweiler and I. Ruthven. Towards task-based personal information management evaluations. In SIGIR '07, pages 23--30, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Eshghi and H. K. Tang. A framework for analyzing and improving content-based chunking algorithms. Technical Report 30, Hewlett-Packard Labs, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. X. Fu, J. Budzik, and K. J. Hammond. Mining navigation history for recommendation. In IUI '00, pages 106--112, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Gyllstrom, C. Soules, and A. Veitch. Confluence: enhancing contextual desktop search. In SIGIR '07, pages 717--718, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. M. Hilbert and D. F. Redmiles. Extracting usability information from user interface events. ACM Computing Surveys, 32(4):384--421, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Indri. http://www.lemurproject.org/indri/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. V. Kaptelinin. Umea: translating interaction histories into project contexts. In CHI '03, pages 353--360, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Karger, K. Bakshi, D. Huynh, D. Quan, and V. Sinha. Haystack: A General Purpose Information Management Tool for End Users of Semistructured Data. In CIDR, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. Kelly. Evaluating personal information management behaviors and tools. Commun. ACM, 49(1):84--86, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Microsoft Office Live. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/officelive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Google Mail. http://mail.google.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. N. Oliver, G. Smith, C. Thakkar, and A. C. Surendran. SWISH: semantic analysis of window titles and switching history. In IUI '06, pages 194--201, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. T. Rattenbury and J. Canny. Caad: an automatic task support system. In CHI '07, pages 687--696, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Shen, L. Li, T. G. Dietterich, and J. L. Herlocker. A hybrid learning system for recognizing user tasks from desktop activities and email messages. In IUI '06, pages 86--92, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C. A. N. Soules and G. R. Ganger. Connections: using context to enhance file search. In SOSP '05, pages 119--132, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mac OS X Spotlight. http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/spotlight/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. K. Sugiyama, K. Hatano, and M. Yoshikawa. Adaptive web search based on user profile constructed without any effort from users. In WWW '04, pages 675--684, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. Teevan, S. T. Dumais, and E. Horvitz. Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities. In SIGIR '05, pages 449--456, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. R. W. White and D. Kelly. A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. In CIKM '06, pages 297--306, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Seeing is retrieving: building information context from what the user sees

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '08: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
      January 2008
      458 pages
      ISBN:9781595939876
      DOI:10.1145/1378773

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 January 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader