Abstract
We present a method for measuring the semantic similarity of texts using a corpus-based measure of semantic word similarity and a normalized and modified version of the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) string matching algorithm. Existing methods for computing text similarity have focused mainly on either large documents or individual words. We focus on computing the similarity between two sentences or two short paragraphs. The proposed method can be exploited in a variety of applications involving textual knowledge representation and knowledge discovery. Evaluation results on two different data sets show that our method outperforms several competing methods.
- Allison, L. and Dix, T. 1986. A bit-string longest-common-subsequence algorithm. Inf. Proc. Lett. 23, 305--310.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bollegala, D., Matsuo, Y., and Ishizuka, M. 2007. Measuring semantic similarity between words using web search engines. In WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, 757--766.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burgess, C., Livesay, K., and Lund, K. 1998. Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse. Disc. Proc. 25, 2--3, 211--257.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Coelho, T., Calado, P., Souza, L., Ribeiro-Neto, B., and Muntz, R. 2004. Image retrieval using multiple evidence ranking. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16, 4, 408--417.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cohen, W. 2000. Data integration using similarity joins and a word-based information representation language. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 18, 3, 288--321.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Corley, C. and Mihalcea, R. 2005. Measures of text semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the ACL workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence (Ann Arbor, MI).]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dolan, W., Quirk, C., and Brockett, C. 2004. Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: Exploiting massively parallel news sources. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erkan, G. and Radev, D. 2004. Lexrank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. J. Artif. Intell. Research 22, 457--479.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Foltz, P., Kintsch, W., and Landauer, T. 1998. The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Disc. Proc. 25, 2--3, 285--307.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frawley, W. 1992. Linguistic Semantics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.]]Google Scholar
- Hatzivassiloglou, V., Klavans, J., and Eskin, E. 1999. Detecting text similarity over short passages: Exploring linguistic feature combinations via machine learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora. 203--212.]]Google Scholar
- Islam, A. and Inkpen, D. 2006. Second order co-occurrence PMI for determining the semantic similarity of words. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. (Genoa, Italy). 1033--1038.]]Google Scholar
- Islam, A., Inkpen, D. Z., and Kiringa, I. 2008. Applications of corpus-based semantic similarity and word segmentation to database schema matching. The VLDB Journal (Published online).]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.]]Google Scholar
- Jarmasz, M. and Szpakowicz, S. 2003. Roget's thesaurus and semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing. 212--219.]]Google Scholar
- Jiang, J. and Conrath, D. 1997. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics.]]Google Scholar
- Katarzyna, W.-W. and Szczepaniak, P. 2005. Classification of rss-formatted documents using full text similarity measures. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Engineering, D. Lowe and M. Gaedke, Eds. LNCS 3579. Springer, 400--405.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ko, Y., Park, J., and Seo, J. 2004. Improving text categorization using the importance of sentences. Inf. Proc. Manage. 40, 65--79.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kondrak, G. 2005. N-gram similarity and distance. In Proceedings of the 12h International Conference on String Processing and Information Retrieval (Buenos Aires, Argentina). 115--126.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Landauer, T. and Dumais, S. 1997. A solution to platos problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psych. Rev. 104, 2, 211--240.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Landauer, T., Foltz, P., and Laham, D. 1998. Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Dis. Proc. 25, 2--3, 259--284.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lapata, M. and Barzilay, R. 2005. Automatic evaluation of text coherence: Models and representations. In Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on AI.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leacock, C. and Chodorow, M. 1998. WordNet: An electronic lexical database. MIT Press, Chapter Combining local context andWordNet similarity for word sense identification, 265--283.]]Google Scholar
- Lesk, M. 1986. Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: How to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone. In Proceedings of the SIGDOC Conference.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, Y., Bandar, Z., and Mclean, D. 2003. An approach for measuring semantic similarity using multiple information sources. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 15, 4, 871--882.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, Y., McLean, D., Bandar, Z., O'Shea, J., and Crockett, K. 2006. Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 18, 8, 1138--1149.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin, C. and Hovy, E. 2003. Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin, D. 1998. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liu, T. and Guo, J. 2005. Text similarity computing based on standard deviation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, D.-S. Huang, X.-P. Zhang, and G.-B. Huang, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3644. Springer-Verlag, New York, 456--464.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liu, Y. and Zong, C. 2004. Example-based chinese-english mt. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Vol. 1--7. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 6093--6096.]]Google Scholar
- Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P., Doan, A., and Halevy, A. 2005. Corpus-based schema matching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maguitman, A., Menczer, F., Roinestad, H., and Vespignani, A. 2005. Algorithmic detection of semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the 14th International World Wide Web Conference.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meadow, C., Boyce, B., and Kraft, D. 2000. Text Information Retrieval Systems, second ed. Academic Press.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melamed, I. D. 1999. Bitext maps and alignment via pattern recognition. Computat. Linguist. 25, 1, 107--130.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., and Strapparava, C. 2006. Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence. (Boston, MA).]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miller, G., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., and Miller, K. 1993. Introduction to wordnet: An on-line lexical database. Tech. Rep. 43, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.]]Google Scholar
- Miller, G. A. and Charles, W. G. 1991. Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Lang. and Cognitive Processes 6, 1, 1--28.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., and Zhu, W. 2002. Bleu: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting Association for Computational Linguistics.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Park, E., Ra, D., and Jang, M. 2005. Techniques for improving web retrieval effectiveness. Inf. Processing and Management 41, 5, 1207--1223.]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- Resnik, P. 1995. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on AI.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rodriguez, M. A. and Egenhofer, M. J. 2003. Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 15, 2, 442--456.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rubenstein, H. and Goodenough, J. B. 1965. Contextual correlates of synonymy. Comm. ACM 8, 10, 627--633.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Salton, G. and Lesk, M. 1971. Computer Evaluation of Indexing and Text Processing. Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.]]Google Scholar
- Schallehn, E., Sattler, K., and Saake, G. 2004. Efficient similarity-based operations for data integration. Data Knowl. Eng. 48, 361--387.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schutze, H. 1998. Automatic word sense discrimination. Computat. Linguist. 24, 1, 97--124.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sinclair, J., Ed. 2001. Collins Cobuild English Dictionary for Advanced Learners, third ed. Harper Collins.]]Google Scholar
- Turney, P. 2001. Mining the web for synonyms: Pmi-ir versus LSA on TOEFL. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Machine Learning.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weeds, J., Weir, D., and McCarthy, D. 2004. Characterising measures of lexical distributional similarity. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1015--1021.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wiemer-Hastings, P. 2000. Adding syntactic information to lsa. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference Cognitive Science Society. 989--993.]]Google Scholar
- Wu, Z. and Palmer, M. 1994. Verb semantics and lexical selection. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting Association for Computational Linguistics.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Semantic text similarity using corpus-based word similarity and string similarity
Recommendations
Developing a Cross-lingual Semantic Word Similarity Corpus for English–Urdu Language Pair
Semantic word similarity is a quantitative measure of how much two words are contextually similar. Evaluation of semantic word similarity models requires a benchmark corpus. However, despite the millions of speakers and the large digital text of the Urdu ...
Using Fuzzy Set Similarity in Sentence Similarity Measures
2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)Sentence similarity measures the similarity between two blocks of text. A semantic similarity measure between individual pairs of words, each taken from the two blocks of text, has been used in STASIS. Word similarity is measured based on the distance ...
Developing a Large Benchmark Corpus for Urdu Semantic Word Similarity
The semantic word similarity task aims to quantify the degree of similarity between a pair of words. In literature, efforts have been made to create standard evaluation resources to develop, evaluate, and compare various methods for semantic word ...
Comments