Abstract
The role of prototypes is well established in the field of HCI and Design. A lack of knowledge, however, about the fundamental nature of prototypes still exists. Researchers have attempted to identify different types of prototypes, such as low- vs. high-fidelity prototypes, but these attempts have centered on evaluation rather than support of design exploration. There have also been efforts to provide new ways of thinking about the activity of using prototypes, such as experience prototyping and paper prototyping, but these efforts do not provide a discourse for understanding fundamental characteristics of prototypes. In this article, we propose an anatomy of prototypes as a framework for prototype conceptualization. We view prototypes not only in their role in evaluation but also in their generative role in enabling designers to reflect on their design activities in exploring a design space. We base this framework on the findings of two case studies that reveal two key dimensions: prototypes as filters and prototypes as manifestations. We explain why these two dimensions are important and how this conceptual framework can benefit our field by establishing more solid and systematic knowledge about prototypes and prototyping.
- Adams, R. 2002. Understanding design iteration: Representations from an empirical study. In Proceedings of Common Ground International Conference, London, Design Research Society.Google Scholar
- Anatomy. 2006. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/.Google Scholar
- Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., and Silverstein, M., with Jacobson, M., Fikidahl-King, I, and Angel, S. 1977. A Pattern Language, Oxford University Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Avrahami, D. and Hudson, S. E. 2002. Forming interactivity: A tool for rapid prototyping of physical interactive products. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. London, England. ACM Press, New York, NY, 141--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bailey, B. P., Konstan, J. A., and Carlis, J. V. 2001. DEMAIS: Designing multimedia applications with interactive storyboards. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Ottawa, Canada, ACM Press, New York, NY, 241--250. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brandt, E. and Messeter, J. 2004. Facilitating collaboration through design games. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices vol. 1. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ACM Press, New York, NY, 121--131. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buchenau, M. and Suri, J. F. 2000. Experience prototyping. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. New York, NY. ACM Press, New York, NY, 424--433. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buxton, B. 2007. Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark, A. 2001. Natural-Born Cyborgs? In Proceedings of Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind: 4th International Conference. Warwick, UK. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 17--24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cockton, G. and Woolrych, A. 2002. Sale must end: Should discount methods be cleared off hci's shelves? Interactions 9, 5, 13--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Convertino, G., Neale, D. C., Hobby, L., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. 2004. A laboratory method for studying activity awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Tampere, Finland. ACM Press, New York, NY, 313--322. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Floyd, C. 1984. A systematic look at prototyping. In Approaches to Prototyping, Budde, R., Kuhlenkamp, K., Mathiassen, L., and Zullighoven, H. Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goel, V. and Pirolli, P. 1992. The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science 16, 395--429.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grady, H. M. 2000. Web site design: a case study in usability testing using paper prototypes. In Proceedings of IEEE Professional Communication Society International Professional Communication Conference and Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM International Conference on Computer Documentation: Technology and Teamwork. Cambridge, MA. ACM/IEEE, 39--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greenberg, S. and Boyle, M. 2002. Customizable physical interfaces for interacting with conventional applications. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Paris, France. ACM Press, New York, NY, 31--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gutierrez, O. 1989. Prototyping techniques for different problem contexts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Wings For the Mind. ACM Press, New York, NY, 259--264. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jones, W., Spool, J., Grudin, J., Bellotti, V., and Czerwinski, M. 2007. “Get real!”: What's wrong with hci prototyping and how can we fix it? In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07). San Jose, CA. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1913--1916. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Landay, J. A. 1996. SILK: Sketching interfaces like krazy. In Proceedings of the Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground, Vancouver. British Columbia, Canada. ACM Press, New York, NY, 398--399. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee, J. C., Avrahami, D., Hudson, S. E., Forlizzi, J., Dietz, P. H., and Leigh, D. 2004. The calder toolkit: Wired and wireless components for rapidly prototyping interactive devices. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. Cambridge, MA. ACM Press, New York, NY, 167--175. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Levy, S. 2006. The Perfect Thing, Wired 14, 11 (http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.11/ipod.html.)Google Scholar
- Lichter, H., Schneider-Hufschmidt, M., and Züllighoven, H. 1993. Prototyping in industrial software projects—bridging the gap between theory and practice. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering. Baltimore, MD. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 221--229. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lim, Y. 2003. Design information framework for integrating multiple aspects of design, Ph.D. dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Lim, Y., Pangam, A., Periyasami, S., and Aneja, S. 2006. Comparative analysis of high- and low-fidelity prototypes for more valid usability evaluations of mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles. Oslo, Norway. ACM Press, New York, NY, 291--300. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin, J., Newman, M. W., Hong, J. I., and Landay, J. A. 2000. DENIM: Finding a tighter fit between tools and practice for Web site design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. The Hague, The Netherlands. ACM Press, New York, NY, 510--517. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liu, L. and Khooshabeh, P. 2003. Paper or interactive?: A study of prototyping techniques for ubiquitous computing environments. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'03), Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1030--1031. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Löwgren, J., Stolterman, E. 2004. Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Macintyre, B., Gandy, M., Dow, S., and Bolter, J. D. 2004. DART: A toolkit for rapid design exploration of augmented reality experiences. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Santa Fe, NM. ACM Press, New York, NY, 197--206. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McCurdy, M., Connors, C., Pyrzak, G., Kanefsky, B., and Vera, A. 2006. Breaking the fidelity barrier: An examination of our current characterization of prototypes and an example of a mixed-fidelity success. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Montréal, Québec, Canada. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1233--1242. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Moran, T. P. and Carroll, J. M. Eds. 1996. Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Muller, M. J. 2001. Layered participatory analysis: new developments in the CARD technique. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seattle, WA. ACM Press, New York, NY, 90--97. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nam, T. and Lee, W. 2003. Integrating hardware and software: Augmented reality based prototyping method for digital products. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'03), Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA. ACM Press, New York, NY, 956--957. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pering, C. 2002. Interaction design prototyping of communicator devices: Towards meeting the hardware-software challenge. Interactions 9, 6, 36--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reichl, P., Froehlich, P., Baillie, L., Schatz, R., and Dantcheva, A. 2007. The LiLiPUT prototype: A wearable lab environment for user tests of mobile telecommunication applications. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07). San Jose, CA. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1833--1838. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rettig, M. 1994. Prototyping for tiny fingers. Comm. ACM 37, 4, 21--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rudd, J., Stern, K., and Isensee, S. 1996. Low vs. high-fidelity prototyping debate. Interactions 3, 1, 76--85. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schneider, K. 1996. Prototypes as assets, not toys: Why and how to extract knowledge from prototypes. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering. Berlin, Germany. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 522--531. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schön D. A. 1982. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Harper Collins, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Schön D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
- Sefelin, R., Tscheligi, M., and Giller, V. 2003. Paper prototyping—what is it good for?: A comparison of paper- and computer-based low-fidelity prototyping. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'03). Ft. Lauderdale, FL. ACM Press, New York, NY, 778--779. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Skog, D. and Söderlund, M. 1999. Virtual information representation. In Proceedings of the 22nd Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Keuruu, Finland.Google Scholar
- Snyder, C. 2003. Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy Way to Define and Refine User Interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
- Spool, J. and Schroeder, W. 2001. Testing web sites: Five users is nowhere near enough. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing-Systems (CHI'01). Seattle, WA. ACM, New York, NY, 285--286. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Svanaes, D. and Seland, G. 2004. Putting the users center stage: role playing and low-fi prototyping enable end users to design mobile systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vienna, Austria. ACM Press, New York, NY, 479--486. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thompson, M. and Wishbow, N. 1992. Prototyping: Tools and techniques: improving software and documentation quality through rapid prototyping. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. ACM Press, New York, NY, 191--199. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tidwell, J. 2005. Designing Interfaces. O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tyszberowicz, S. and Yehudai, A. 1992. OBSERV—A prototyping language and environment. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 1, 3, 269--309. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van Duyne, D. K., Landay, J. A., and Hong, J. I. 2002. The Design of Sites: Patterns, Principles, and Processes for Crafting a Customer-Centered Web Experience. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van Leeuwen, C., Verstijnen, I. and Hekkert, P. 1999. Common unconscious dynamics underlie common conscious effects: A case study in the interactive nature of perception and creation. In Modeling Consciousness Across the Disciplines, S. Jordan, Ed. University Press of America, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
- Virzi, R. A., Sokolov, J. L., and Karis, D. 1996. Usability problem identification using both low- and high-fidelity prototypes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ACM Press, New York, NY, 236--243. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walkers, M., Takayama, L., and Landay, J. 2002. High-fidelity or low-fidelity paper or computer medium? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (HFES'02). 661--665.Google Scholar
- Wong, Y. Y. 1992. Rough and ready prototypes: lessons from graphic design. In Posters and Short Talks of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Monterey, CA. ACM, New York, NY, 83--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zucconi, L., Mack, G., and Williams, L. G. 1990. Using object-oriented development for support prototyping. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Software Engineering. Nice, France. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 129--132. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas
Recommendations
Prototyping and Prototype use in Participatory Design with older adults: A systematic literature review
PDC '22: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 1This systematic literature review examines the role of prototyping and prototype use in Participatory Design (PD) with older adults. Through text analysis of 68 studies, ten descriptive categories of forms of prototyping and prototype use were ...
Comparing user interaction with low and high fidelity prototypes of tabletop surfaces
NordiCHI '10: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending BoundariesThis paper describes a comparative study between the usage of low-fidelity and a high-fidelity prototyping for the creation of multi-user multi-touch interfaces. The multi-touch interface presented in this paper allows users to collaboratively search ...
Enhancing experience prototyping by the help of mixed-fidelity prototypes
Mobility '07: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on mobile technology, applications, and systems and the 1st international symposium on Computer human interaction in mobile technologyIn this research review I undertook the problem related to the usage of a new concept known as the Mixed- Fidelity Prototype which is a mixture of its predecessors Low- and High- Fidelity Prototypes in Experience Prototyping. Experience Prototyping is a ...
Comments