skip to main content
10.1145/1368044.1368064acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A survey on the accessibility awareness of people involved in web development projects in Brazil

Published:21 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Accessibility has become a very important issue to promote inclusion in the Information Society, and people involved in Web development projects have a very important role to contribute with the development of a more inclusive Web. In this paper, we propose an investigation on the accessibility awareness of people involved in Web development in Brazil. We have conducted the research by means of an exploratory survey with a Web based questionnaire and a sample with subjects from academy, industry and government. The study had 613 valid answers and involved representatives from all of the 27 states of Brazil. The results show that accessibility is still far from being actually considered in Web development projects in Brazil, as only 19.9% of the participants have stated that accessibility is considered in their projects. The lack of education on accessibility, as well as the poor spread of the Brazilian accessibility law are important issues to be dealt with to boost a stronger accessibility awareness among people involved in Web development.

References

  1. Acessibilidade Brasil. daSilva, 2007. Available online at http://www.dasilva.org.br. Last accessed in January, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Ahmad, L. Zhang, and F. Azam. Measuring navigational burden. In Fourth International Conference on Proceedings of Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications,, pages 307--314. IEEE, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. Ault, J. Deloge, R. Lapp, M. Morgan, and J. Barnett. Evaluation of long descriptions of statistical graphics for blind and low vision web users. In Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, page 517, Linz, Austria, 2002. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brazilian Government. Accessibility Model for e-Government - version 2.0, 2008. Available online at http://www.governoeletronico.gov.br/emag. Last access at January/2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ENABLED. Enabled web developer survey, 2005. Available at http://www.enabledweb.org/public_results/survey_results/. Last access in January/2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. B. L. Ferreira, R. C. dos Santos, and D. S. da Silveira. Panorama of Brazilian Web Accessibility. In Proceedings of the XXXI ANPAD Meeting - EnANPAD, page 17p, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Filepp, J. Challenger, and D. Rosu. Improving the accessibility of aurally rendered html tables. In Assets '02: Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies, pages 9--16, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. P. Freire, T. J. Bittar, and R. P. M. Fortes. An approach based on metrics for monitoring web accessibility in brazilian municipalities web sites. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 2420--2424. ACM Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. P. Freire, R. P. de Mattos Fortes, D. M. B. Paiva, and M. A. S. Turine. Using screen readers to reinforce web accessibility education. SIGCSE Bull., 39(3):82--86, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. P. Freire, R. Goularte, and R. P. de Mattos Fortes. Techniques for developing more accessible web applications: a survey towards a process classification. In SIGDOC '07: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, pages 162--169, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Freitas, M. Oliveira, A. Z. Saccol, and J. Moscarola. The survey method (in portuguese). Journal of Management, USP, RAUSP, 35(3):105--112, Jul-Sep 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Goette, C. Collier, and J. D. White. An exploratory study of the accessibility of state government Web sites. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5(1):41--50, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. L. Hull. Accessibility: it's not just for disabilities any more. Interactions, 11(2):36--41, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. K. Kane, J. A. Shulman, T. J. Shockley, and R. E. Ladner. A web accessibility report card for top international university web sites. In W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 148--156, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. Kouroupetroglou, M. Salampasis, and A. Manitsaris. A semantic-web based framework for developing applications to improve accessibility in the www. In W4A: Proceedings of the 2006 international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 98--108, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Lazar, A. Dudley-Sponaugle, and K. Greenidge. Improving Web Accessibility: A Study of Webmaster Perceptions. Computers and Human Behavior, 20(2):269--288, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. P. Plessers, S. Casteleyn, Y. Yesilada, O. D. Troyer, R. Stevens, S. Harper, and C. Goble. Accessibility: a web engineering approach. In WWW '05: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 353--362, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. J. Rosmaita. Accessibility first!: a new approach to web design. In SIGCSE '06: Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 270--274, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Sloan, A. Heath, F. Hamilton, B. Kelly, H. Petrie, and L. Phipps. Contextual web accessibility - maximizing the benefit of accessibility guidelines. In W4A: Proceedings of the 2006 international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 121--131, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. M. Tangarife. Accessibility of governmental web sites: Eletrobras case study. Master's thesis, Department de Arts and Design, Pontifcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. T. M. Tangarife and C. Mont'alvao. What the brazilian developers know about web accessibility and digital inclusion? In Proceedings of the 6 USIHC - 6 International Congress on Ergonomics, Usability, Interface Design and Human-Computer Interaction, page 6p, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Thatcher, P. Bohman, M. Burks, S. L. Henry, B. Regan, S. Swierenga, and M. Urban. Constructing Accessible Web Sites. Glasshaus, 1a edition, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. U.S. Government. Section 508, 2007. Available online at http://www.section508.gov. Last access at January/2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Vigo, M. Arrue, G. Brajnik, R. Lomuscio, and J. Abascal. Quantitative metrics for measuring web accessibility. In W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 99--107, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. W3C. Web Content Acessibility Guidelines 1.0, 1999. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10. Last access at February 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. W3C. Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, 2000. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG10. Last access at February 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. W3C. Web Content Acessibility Guidelines 2.0 - Working Draft, 2007. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20. Last access at February 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Zajicek. Successful and available: interface design exemplars for older users. Interacting with Computers, 16:411--430, June 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A survey on the accessibility awareness of people involved in web development projects in Brazil

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      W4A '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A)
      April 2008
      207 pages
      ISBN:9781605581538
      DOI:10.1145/1368044

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      W4A '08 Paper Acceptance Rate12of29submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader