skip to main content
10.1145/1362550.1362615acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

The effects of time limitations on target identification

Published:28 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivation -- Aiming at making image interpretation more efficient, we studied the effects of limiting exposure durations on performance.

Research approach -- Two psychophysical experiments were performed examining the performance of 36 expert image analysts. The targets were presented at three image quality levels.

Findings -- The results suggest that limiting the exposure duration of an image to four seconds does not impair the performance of the analysts, i.e., four seconds suffice for identification in an the image interpretation task, no matter what the quality of the image.

Research Implications -- This finding suggests that limiting the exposure duration during actual image interpretation would be beneficial since it would shorten the total amount of time needed for interpretation while not lowering the probability of correct identification.

Take away message -- Sometimes unlimited time is not necessary in order to obtain the best results. When someone is an expert at what s/he does, making a quick decision might yield equivalent outcomes

References

  1. Beechler, R. L., Winterstein, S. H., Kamper R. M., Jeffrey T. E. (1969). A study of rapid photointerpretation methods. US-Army-BESRL-Technical-Research-Note, 1153: 76Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dunning, D., Stern, L-B., (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5). 818--835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Dunning, D., & Perretta, S. (2002). Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: A 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 951--962.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kahneman, D. (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice. Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697--720.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 349--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. The effects of time limitations on target identification

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ECCE '07: Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: invent! explore!
      August 2007
      334 pages
      ISBN:9781847998491
      DOI:10.1145/1362550

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 August 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader