skip to main content
10.1145/1358628.1358663acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
panel

The next challenge: from easy-to-use to easy-to-develop. are you ready?

Published:05 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The main challenge of next years is to allow users of software systems, who are non-professional software developers, to create, modify or extend software artefacts. In this panel we want to discuss with the CHI community the key aspects in the area of End User Development and an associated research agenda, which should be then proposed to the main research agencies, such as NSF and EU ICT.

References

  1. Benkler, Y. (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Yale University Press, New Haven. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beringer, Jörg (2004) Reducing Expertise Tension., End User Development, Communications of the ACM, Sept. 2004, Volume 47, Number 9, 39--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Berti, S., Paternò, F., Santoro, C. Natural Development of Nomadic Interfaces Based on Conceptual Descriptions, in End User Development, pp.143--160, Springer Verlag, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Costabile, M. F.; Fogli, D.; Mussio, P.; Piccinno, A., Visual Interactive Systems for End-User Development: A Model-Based Design Methodology, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, part A- Systems and Humans, Vol. 37, Nov. 2007. pp.:1029--1046. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fischer, G. (2002) Beyond 'Couch Potatoes': From Consumers to Designers and Active Contributors, in FirstMonday (Peer-Reviewed Journa), Available at http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_12/fischer/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer, G., & Giaccardi, E. (2006) "Meta-Design: A Framework for the Future of End User Development." In H. Lieberman, F. Paternòò, & V. Wulf (Eds.), End User Development, Springer Verlag, pp. 427--457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ko, A.J. and Myers, B.A., "A Framework and Methodology for Studying the Causes of Software Errors in Programming Systems." Journal of Visual Languages and Comput., Feb, 2005. 16(1): pp. 41--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ko, A.J. and Myers, B.A. "Designing the Whyline, A Debugging Interface for Asking Why and Why Not questions about Runtime Failures," in Proceedings CHI'2004. April 24-29, 2004. Vienna: pp. 151--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Myers, B. A., Pane, J. F. and Ko, A. Natural Programming Languages and Environments. Communications of the ACM, Sept. 2004, 47, 9, 47--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The next challenge: from easy-to-use to easy-to-develop. are you ready?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '08: CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2008
      2035 pages
      ISBN:9781605580128
      DOI:10.1145/1358628

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 April 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • panel

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader