Emotional and behavioral responses to haptic stimulation

ABSTRACT

A prototype of friction-based horizontally rotating fingertip stimulator was used to investigate emotional experiences and behavioral responses to haptic stimulation. The rotation style of 12 different stimuli was varied by burst length (i.e., 20, 50, 100 ms), continuity (i.e., continuous and discontinuous), and direction (e.g., forward and backward). Using these stimuli 528 stimulus pairs were presented to 12 subjects who were to distinguish if stimuli in each pair were the same or different. Then they rated the stimuli using four scales measuring the pleasantness, arousal, approachability, and dominance qualities of the 12 stimuli. The results showed that continuous forward-backward rotating stimuli were rated as significantly more unpleasant, arousing, avoidable, and dominating than other types of stimulations (e.g., discontinuous forward rotation). The reaction times to these stimuli were significantly faster than reaction times to discontinuous forward and backward rotating stimuli. The results clearly suggest that even simple haptic stimulation can carry emotional information. The results can be utilized when making use of haptics in human-technology interaction.

References

1. Anttonen, J. and Surakka, V. Emotions and heart rate while sitting on a chair. Proc. CHI 2005, (2005), ACM Press, 491--499.
2. Aula, A. and Surakka, V. Auditory emotional feedback facilitates human-computer interaction. Proc. British HCI, (2002), Springer-Verlag, 337--349.
3. Bonnani, L., Lieberman, C., Vaucelle, J., and Zuckerman, O. TapTap: A haptic wearable for asynchronous distributed touch therapy, Proc. CHI 2006, (2006), ACM Press, 580--585.
4. Bradley, M. and Lang, P.J. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential, Journal of Behavioral Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 1 (1994), 49--59.
5. Brewster, S. and Brown, L.M. Tactons: Structured tactile messages for non-visual information display, Proc. AUIC2004, 28, (2004), Australian Computer Society, 15--23.
6. Brown, L.M., Brewster, S., and Purchase, H. A first investigation into the effectiveness of tactons, Proc. First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, (2005), IEEE Computer Society, 167--176.
7. Brown, L.M. and Kaaresoja, T. Feel who's talking: Using tactons for mobile phone alerts, Proc. CHI 2006, (2006), ACM Press, 604--609.
8. Chang, A., Resner, B., Koerner, B., Wang, X.C., and Ishii H. LumiTouch: An emotional communication device, Proc. CHI 2001, (2001), ACM Press, 313--314.
9. Davidson, R.J. Cerebral asymmetry, emotion and affective style. In R. J. Davidson, and K. Hugdahl (Eds.), Brain Asymmetry, (1995), Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 361--387.
10. DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., and Montgomery, E. The hug: An exploration of robotic form for intimate communication, Proc. RO-MAN, (2003), IEEE, 403--408.
11. Drescher, M.A., Gantt, W.H., and Whitehead, W. E. Heart rate response to touch, Psychosomatic Medicine, 42, 6 (1980), 559--565.
12. Ekman, P. Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell's mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 2 (1994), 268--287.
13. Harlow, H.F. The nature of love, American Psychologist, 13, 2 (1958), 673--685.
14. 14.Harlow, H.F. Learning to Love. San Francisco: Albion, (1971).
15. Harlow, H.F., Dodsworth, R.O., and Harlow, M.K. Total social isolation in monkeys, Proceedings of the Natonal Academy of Sciences U S A. July, 54, 1 (1965), 90--97.
16. Hayward, V. and Cruz-Hernandez, J.M. Tactile display device using distributed lateral skin stretch, Proc. IMECE 2000, (2000), IEEE, 1309--1314.
17. Hertenstein, M.J., Keltner, D., App, B., Bulleit, B., and Jaskolka, A. Touch communicates distinct emotions. Emotion, 6, 3 (2006), 528--533.
18. Hinckley, K. and Sinclair, M. Touch-sensing input devices, Proc. CHI 1999, (1999), ACM Press, 223--230.
19. Izard, C.E. Human Emotions. Plenum Press: New York, (1977).
20. LeDoux, J.E. Cognition versus emotion, again - this time in the brain: A response to Parrott and Schulkin. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 1 (1993), 61--64.
21. Linjama, J. and Kaaresoja, T. Novel, minimalist haptic gesture interaction for mobile devices, Proc. NordiCHI'04, (2004), ACM Press, 457--458.
22. MacLean, K.E. and Enriquez, M. Perceptual design of haptic icons Proc. EuroHaptics 2003, (2003), 351--363.
23. Mentis, H.M. and Gay, G.K. Using TouchPad pressure to detect negative affect, Proc. ICMI'02, (2002), IEEE, 406--410.
24. Osgood, C.E. The nature and measurement of meaning, Psychological Bulletin, 49, 3 (1952), 197--237.
25. Partala, T. and Surakka, V. The effects of affective interventions in human-computer interaction. Interacting with Computers, 16, 2 (2004), 295--309.
26. Rovers, A.F. and van Essen, H.A. Design and evaluation of hapticons for enriched instant messaging, Proc. EuroHaptics 2004, (2004), Springer-Verlag, 498--503.
27. Rovers, A.F. and van Essen, H.A. HIM: A framework for haptic instant messaging, Proc. CHI 2004, (2004), ACM Press, 1313--1316.
28. Rovers, A.F. and van Essen, H.A. Using active haptic feedback in everyday products, Proc. EuroHaptics 2006, (2006), Springer-Verlag, 447--453.
29. Russell, J.A. Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expressions? A review of the cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 1 (1994), 102--141.
30. Schlosberg, H. Three dimensions of emotion, The Psychological Review, 61, 2 (1954), 81--88.
31. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., and Zuccolotto, A. E-Prime User's Guide. Psychology Software Tools, Inc, Pittsburgh, (2002).
32. Smith, J. and MacLean, K. Communicating emotion through a haptic link: Design space and methodology, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 4 (2007), 376--387.
33. Suomi, S.J., Collins, M.L., Harlow, H.F., and Ruppenthal, G.C. Effects of maternal and peer separations on young monkeys, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 2 (1976), 101--112.
34. Surakka, V. and Hietanen, J. K. Facial and emotional reactions to Duchenne and non-Duchenne smiles. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29, 1 (1998), 23--33.
35. Tsagarakis, N.G., Horne, T., and Caldwell, D.G. Slip aestheasis: A portable 2D slip/skin stretch display for the fingertip, Proc. First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems,, (2005), IEEE Computer Society, 214--219.
36. Yohanan, S., Chan, M., Hopkins, J., Sun, H., and MacLean, K.E. Hapticat: Exploration of affective touch, Proc. ICMI'05, (2005), IEEE, 222--229.
37. Webster, R.J., Murphy, T.E., Verner, L.N., and Okamura, A.M. A novel two-dimensional tactile slip display: Design, kinematics and perceptual experiments, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2, 2 (2005), 150--165.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction devices

      • Haptic devices