Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles

ABSTRACT

Online dating systems play a prominent role in the social lives of millions of their users, but little research has considered how users perceive one another through their personal profiles. We examined how users perceive attractiveness in online dating profiles, which provide their first exposure to a potential partner. Participants rated whole profiles and profile components on such qualities as how attractive, extraverted, and genuine and trustworthy they appeared. As past research in the psychology of attraction would suggest, the attractiveness and other qualities of the photograph were the strongest predictors of whole profile attractiveness, but they were not alone: the free-text component also played an important role in predicting overall attractiveness. In turn, numerous other qualities predicted the attractiveness ratings of photos and free-text components, albeit in different ways for men and women. The fixed-choice elements of a profile, however, were unrelated to attractiveness.

References

1. Cunningham, W.H., Cunningham, I.C.M., and R.T. Green. "The Ipsative Process to Reduce Response Set Bias." In The Public Opinion Quarterly 41 (3), 1977: pp. 379--384.
2. Daft, R.L., and R.H. Lengel. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design." In Management Science 32 (5), 1986: pp. 554--571.
3. Dennis, A.R., and S.T. Kinney. "Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality." In Information Systems Research 9 (3), 1998.
4. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., and E. Walster. (1972). What is Beautiful is Good. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24, pp. 285--290.
5. Donath, J. "Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community." In Smith, M., and P. Kollock (Eds.) Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge, 1998.
6. Donath, J. Signals, Truth and Design. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press (forthcoming).
7. Ellison, N., Heino, R., and J. Gibbs. "Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment." In Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2), 2006.
8. Fiore, A.T., and J.S. Donath. "Online Personals: An Overview." In Extended Abstracts of Computer-Human Interaction 2004.
9. Fiore, A.T., and J.S. Donath. "Homophily in Online Dating: When Do You Like Someone Like Yourself?" In Extended Abstracts of Computer-Human Interaction 2005.
10. Goffman, E. (1956) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
11. Gosling, S.D., Gaddis, S., and S. Vazire. (2007) "Personality Impressions Based on Facebook Profiles." International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 2007, Boulder, Colo.
12. Hancock, J.T., Toma, C., and N. Ellison. "The truth about lying in online dating profiles." In Proc. Computer-Human Interaction 2007.
13. Lea, M., and R. Spears. (1995). "Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks." In J. T. Wood and S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
14. Levine, D. (2000). "Virtual Attraction: What Rocks Your Boat." In CyberPsychology and Behavior 3 (4), pp. 565--573.
15. Madden, M., and A. Lenhart. Online Dating. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2006).
16. McKenna, K.Y.A., Green, A.S., and M.E.J. Gleason. (2002). "Relationship Formation on the Internet: What's the Big Attraction?" In Journal of Social Issues 58 (1), pp. 9--31.
17. Mulrine, A. "Love.com: For better or for worse, the Internet is radically changing the dating scene in America." In U.S. News and World Report, Sept. 29, 2003.
18. Norton, M., Frost, J., & D. Ariely. (2007). Less is more: The lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (1), pp. 97--105.
19. Parks, M.R., and K. Floyd. "Making Friends in Cyberspace." In Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1 (4), 1996.
20. Pennebaker, J.W., and M.E. Francis. "Cognitive, Emotional, and Language Processes in Disclosure." In Cognition and Emotion 10 (6), 1996.
21. Riegelsberger, J., Counts, S., Farnham, S.D., and B.C. Philips. "Sounds Good to Me: Effects of Photo and Voice Profiles on Gaming Partner Choice." In Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 2006.
22. Short, J., Williams, E., and B. Christie. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
23. Sproull, L., and S. Kiesler. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. In Management Science 32: pp. 1492--1512.
24. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., and L. Rottman. (1966). "Importance of Physical Attractiveness in Dating Behavior." In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4, pp. 508--516.
25. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19 (1), 52--91.
26. Walther, J.B. "Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction." In Communication Research 23 (1), 1996: pp. 3--44.
27. Walther, J.B., Slovacek, C., and L.C. Tidwell. "Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long term and short term virtual teams." In Communication Research 28 (1), 2001: pp. 105--134.
28. Whitty, M. (2003). "Cyber-Flirting: An Examination of Men's and Women's Flirting Behaviour Both Offline and on the Internet." In Behaviour Change 21 (2), 2004.
29. Whitty, M. (2007). "Love letters: The development of romantic relationships throughout the ages." In Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T., and U-D. Reips (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30. Whitty, M., and A. Carr. (2006). Cyberspace Romance: The Psychology of Online Relationships. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

    • Collaborative and social computing systems and tools

      • Asynchronous editors

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Web-based interaction