skip to main content
10.1145/1349822.1349840acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Housewives or technophiles?: understanding domestic robot owners

Published:12 March 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite the growing body of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) research focused on domestic robots, surprisingly little is known about the demographic profile of robot owners and their influence on usage patterns. In this paper, we present the results of a survey of 379 iRobot's Roombao wners, that identified their demographic and usage trends. The outcome of the survey suggests that Roomba users are equally likely to be men or women, and they tend to be younger with high levels of education and technical backgrounds. Their adoption and use patterns illustrate the important role that gift exchange plays in adoption, and how the robot changes cleaning routines and creates non-cleaning activities. More generally, we argue that domestic robot adoption is growing, and suggest some of the factors that lead to a positive experience.

References

  1. Bartneck, C., Hoek, M.v.d., Mubin, O., and Mahmud, A.A. 2007. "Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do!": switching off a robot. ACM Press, Arlington, Virginia, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard, H.R. 2000. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bethel, C.L. and Murphy, R.R. 2006. Affective Expression in Appearance--Constrained Robots. in HRI'06. 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Breazeal, C. 2001. Affective Interaction between Humans and Robots. in ECAL'01. 2001, Prague, Czech Republic, Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Christensen, H.I. 2003. Intelligent Home Appliances. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics (STAR)(6), p.319--330.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dautenhahn, K., Walters, M., Woods, S., Koay, K.L., Nehaniv, C.L., Sisbot, A., Alami, R., Sim, T., and on. 2006. How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context. in HRI'06. 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Floyd J. Fowler, J. 2001. Survey Research Methods. Third Edition, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Forlizzi, J. 2007. How robotic products become social products: an ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. in HRI'07. 2007, Arlington, Virginia, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Forlizzi, J. and DiSalvo, C. 2006. Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. in HRI'06. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gockley, R., Forlizzi, J., and Simmons, R. 2006. Interactions with a moody robot. in HRI'06. 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gockley, R., Forlizzi, J., and Simmons, R. 2007. Natural person-following behavior for social robots. in HRI'07. 2007, Arlington, Virginia, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gold, K., Fasel, I., Freier, N.G., and Torrey, C. 2007. Young researchers' views on the current and future state of HRI. in HRI'07. 2007, Arlington, Virginia, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Holmquist, L.E. 2005. The robots are coming. interactions, 12(3), p. 58--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kim, H., Lee, H., Chung, S., and Kim, C. 2007. User-centered approach to path planning of cleaning robots: analyzing user's cleaning behavior. in HRI'07. 2007, Arlington, Virginia, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Koay, K.L., Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S.N., and Walters, M.L. 2006. Empirical results from using a comfort level device in human-robot interaction studies. in HRI'06. 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kooijmans, T., Kanda, T., Bartneck, C., Ishiguro, H., and Hagita, N. 2006. Interaction debugging: an integral approach to analyze human-robot interaction. in HRI'06. 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kotaro, H., Daisuke, S., Takayuki, K., Masahiro, S., Satoshi, K., Hiroshi, I., Tsukasa, O., and Norihiro, H. 2007. Humanoid robots as a passive-social medium: a field experiment at a train station. in HRI'07. 2007, Arlington, Virginia, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Marti, P., Pollini, A., Rullo, A., and Shibata, T. 2005. Engaging with Artificial Pets. in Proceedings of the 2005 annual conference on European association of cognitive ergonomics. 2005, University of Athens, Chania, Greece. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Norman, D.A. 1998. The Invisible Computer. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Robinson, J.P. and Milkie, M. 1997. Dances with Dust Bunnies: Housecleaning in America. American Demographics, 19(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Robinson, J.P. and Milkie, M.A. 1998. Back to the Basics: Trends in and Role Determinants of Women's Attitudes toward Housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(1), p. 205--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. Fourth Edition, New York, NY: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., and Hagita, N. 2006. Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. in HRI' 06. 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Steinfeld, A., Fong, T., Kaber, D., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A., and Goodrich, M. 2006. Common metrics for human-robot interaction. in HRI' 06. 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Stubbs, K., Hinds, P., and Wettergreen, D. 2006. Challenges to grounding in human-robot interaction. in HRI' 06. 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sung, J., Guo, L., Grinter, R.E., and Christensen, H.I. 2007. "My Roomba is Rambo": Intimate Home Appliances. in UbiComp 2007. 2007, Innsbruk, Austria. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tanaka, F., Movellan, J.R., Fortenberry, B., and Aisaka, K. 2006. Daily HRI evaluation at a classroom environment: reports from dance interaction experiments. in HRI'06. 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. U.N. 2005, Frankfurt, Germany: United Nations Economic Commissions for Europe and International Federation of Robotics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Veloso, M.M., Rybski, P.E., and Hundelshausen, F.v. 2006. FOCUS: a generalized method for object discovery for robots that observe and interact with humans. in HRI'06. 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S.N., and Koay, K.L. 2007. Robotic etiquette: results from user studies involving a fetch and carry task. in HRI'07. 2007, Arlington, Virginia, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Housewives or technophiles?: understanding domestic robot owners

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HRI '08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
        March 2008
        402 pages
        ISBN:9781605580173
        DOI:10.1145/1349822

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 March 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader