Abstract
The <u>c</u>omputing <u>r</u>esearch <u>m</u>ethods (CRM) literature is scattered across discourse communities and published in specialty journals and conference proceedings. This dispersion has led to the use of inconsistent terminology when referring to CRM. With no established CRM vocabulary and isolated discourse communities, computing as a field needs to engage in a sense-making process to establish the common ground necessary to support meaningful dialog.
We propose to establish common ground through the construction of the <u>c</u>omputing <u>r</u>esearch <u>m</u>ethods <u>m</u>ulti-<u>p</u>erspective <u>d</u>igital <u>l</u>ibrary (CRM-MPDL), a scholar-produced digital resource for the CRM community. As with its parent design research project on teaching CRM, CRM-MPDL is being developed through iterative and participatory design in an emergent fashion in tandem with the larger CRM community.
For our resource to be viable, we must carefully explore the rich details and nuances of our stakeholder communities and the perspectives they bring to the sense-making process. As a discount alternative to truly having a representative sample of our user population "in the room" with us throughout the design and implementation process, we have implemented a development approach for CRM-MPDL using personas as a means to gain insights and feedback from the target user communities.
For this iteration of the development process, we are concentrating on the needs of the faculty.
In this report, we present our evolving understanding of the project, and seek feedback and input on several key aspects of the theoretical and process models. We then present the framework for the faculty personas, as well as an overview of some of the personas at the time the paper was prepared, in the hopes that we can entice readers to visit the project website to help with the ongoing audit and refinement process. We also give an overview of the content model for CRM-MPDL, which will have evolved (and may even be available as a working prototype) by the time this article appears in print. Finally, we conclude with a current status summary, and issue several specific calls for participation in the ongoing work of the project.
- ACM guide to computing literature. http://portal.acm.org/portal.cfm, 2007.Google Scholar
- B. B. Alexander, J. Foertsch, and S. Daffinrud. The spend a summer with a scientist program: An evaluation of program outcomes and the essential elements for success. Technical report, LEAD Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, July 1998.Google Scholar
- V. L. Almstrum, O. Hazzan, M. Guzdial, and M. Petre. Challenges to computer science education research. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 191--192, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. L. Almstrum and C.-C. Wu. The CSedRes toolbox: A resource to support research in computer science education. SIGCSE Bull., 25(4):21--26, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng. Computers and democracy. Aldershot, Avebury, 1987.Google Scholar
- Blogher community guidelines. http://blogher.org/what-are-your-community-guidelines.Google Scholar
- G. Booch. Readn', writ'n, 'rithmetic..and code'n. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1):197--197, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Brainard. The tough road to better science teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(48):A16, 2007.Google Scholar
- S. Brint, M. Riddle, L. Turk-Bicakci, and C. S. Levy. From the liberal to the practical arts in american colleges and universities: Organizational analysis and curricular change. Journal of Higher Education, 76(2):151--180, Mar/Apr 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- The carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/, 2006.Google Scholar
- L. N. Cassel, R. H. Sloan, G. Davies, H. Topi, and A. McGettrick. The computing ontology project: the computing education application. In SIGCSE '07: Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 519--520, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- CiteSeer. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/, 1997.Google Scholar
- A. Cooper. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How To Restore The Sanity. Sams, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Cooper. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum, chapter Designing for Pleasure. Number 9. Sams - Pearson Education, 2004.Google Scholar
- P. J. Denning. Great principles in computing curricula. In SIGCSE '04: Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 336--341, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Dervin. From the mind's eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In B. Dervin, L. Foreman-Wernet, and E. Lauterbach, editors, Sense-Making Methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin, pages 270--292. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, 2003.Google Scholar
- K. Don. Greenstone3: A modular digital library. http://www.greenstone.org/docs/greenstone3/manual.pdf.Google Scholar
- Engineering Information. Compendex. http://www.ei.org/databases/compendex.html.Google Scholar
- S. Fincher and M. Petre. Computer Science Education Research. RoutledgeFalmer, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Fry and S. Talja. The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. J. Inf. Sci., 33(2):115--133, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. L. Glass, V. Ramesh, and I. Vessey. An analysis of research in computing disciplines. Communications of the ACM, 47(6):89--94, June 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Grudin. Obstacles to participatory design in large product development organizations. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka, editors, Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, chapter 6, pages 99--119. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA, 1993.Google Scholar
- J. Grudin and J. Pruitt. Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2002, pages 144--161, 2002.Google Scholar
- Strategic programs for innovations in undergraduate physics: Project report. Technical report, National Task Force on Undergraduate Physics, January 2003.Google Scholar
- H. J. Holz, A. Applin, B. Haberman, D. Joyce, H. Purchase, and C. Reed. Research methods in computing: what are they, and how should we teach them? In ITiCSE-WGR '06: Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education, pages 96--114, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour. Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91:36--74, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. C. Kuhlthau. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42:361--371, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Lave and E. Wenger. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press., 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Liu and R. Houdek. Teaching computer science graduate students scholarly literature review techniques. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 36th Annual, pages 14--19, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. C. McCormick and C.-M. Zhao. Rethinking and reframing the carnegie classification. Change, pages 51--57, September/October 2005.Google Scholar
- B. McMurtrie. Europe's education chief seeks trans-atlantic cooperation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(25):A39, February 2006.Google Scholar
- B. J. Oates. Researching Information Systems and Computing. Sage Publications Ltd., 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Pears, S. Seidman, C. Eney, P. Kinnunen, and L. Malmi. Constructing a core literature for computing education research. SIGCSE Bull., 37(4):152--161, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Pruitt and J. Grudin. Personas: Practice and theory. In Proceedings of DUX 2003, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. H. Russell. Evaluation of nsf support for undergraduate research opportunities: Draft synthesis report executive summary. Technical report, SRI International, July 2006.Google Scholar
- D. Schuler and A. Namioka. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- SIGCSE-CSRM. SIGCSE Committee on Teaching Computer Science Research Methods. http://acc.csueastbay.edu/~csrm/.Google Scholar
- D. I. K. Sjøberg, T. Dybå, and M. Jørgensen. The future of empirical methods in software engineering research. In FOSE '07: 2007 Future of Software Engineering, pages 358--378, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Sumner and M. Marlino. Digital libraries and educational practice: a case for new models. In JCDL '04: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pages 170--178, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. P. Truex, R. Baskerville, and H. Klein. Growing systems in emergent organizations. Commun. ACM, 42(8):117--123, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. L. Van Horn. Empirical studies of management information systems. Data Base, 5(2-3-4):172--182, 1973.Google Scholar
- R. Whitley. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2nd edition, 2000.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A multi-perspective digital library to facilitate integrating teaching research methods across the computing curriculum
Recommendations
A multi-perspective digital library to facilitate integrating teaching research methods across the computing curriculum
ITiCSE-WGR '07: Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science educationThe <u>c</u>omputing <u>r</u>esearch <u>m</u>ethods (CRM) literature is scattered across discourse communities and published in specialty journals and conference proceedings. This dispersion has led to the use of inconsistent terminology when referring ...
Computing research methods multi-perspective digital library: a call for participation
ITiCSE '08: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationFor the past three years, SIGCSE has sponsored a design research project on teaching Computing Research Methods (CRM) [4]. The initial phase of the work included an ITiCSE working group that gathered a great deal of literature on and about: computing ...
Computing research methods multi-perspective digital library: a call for participation
ITiCSE '08For the past three years, SIGCSE has sponsored a design research project on teaching Computing Research Methods (CRM) [4]. The initial phase of the work included an ITiCSE working group that gathered a great deal of literature on and about: computing ...
Comments