skip to main content
10.1145/1324892.1324894acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Seeing like an interface

Published:28 November 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile and ubiquitous computing systems are increasingly of interest to HCI researchers. Often, this has meant considering the ways in which we might migrate desktop applications and everyday usage scenarios to mobile devices and mobile contexts. However, we do not just experience technologies in situ -- we also experience everyday settings through the technologies we have at our disposal. Drawing on anthropological research, I outline an alternative way of thinking about the relationship between technology and "seeing" everyday life and everyday space.

References

  1. Agar, J. 2003. The Government Machine: A Revolutionary History of the Computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Agre, P. 1997. Towards a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Tryng to Reform AI. In Bowker, Gasser, Star, and Turner, eds, Bridging the Great Divide: Social Science, Technical Systems and Collaborative Work. Laurence Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowker, G. and Star, S. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brewer, J., Bassoli, A., Martin, K., Dourish, P., and Mainwaring, S. In press. Aesthetic Journeys: Rethinking Urban Computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dourish, P. 2001. Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for Design. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2006 (Montreal, Quebec), 541--550. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dourish, P. 2006. Re-Space-ing Place: Place and Space Ten Years On. Proc. ACM Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW 2006 (Banff, Alberta), 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dourish, P., Anderson, K., and Nafus, D. 2007. Cultural Mobilities: Diversity and Agency in Urban Computing. Proc. IFIP Conf. Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT 2007 (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dourish, P. and Bell, G. 2007. The Infrastructure of Experience and the Experience of Infrastructure: Meaning and Structure in Everyday Encounters with Space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34, 3, 414--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ferguson, J. 2005. Seeing Like An Oil Company: Space, Security, and Global Capital in Neoliberal Africa. American Anthropologist, 107(3), 377--382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Goss, J. 1995. We Know Who You Are And We Know Where You Live: The Instrumental Rationality of Geodemographic Systems. Economic Geography, 71(2), 171--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits, and Atoms. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'97 (Atlanta, GA), 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kabisch, E. In press. From Virtual to Hybrid Worlds. IEEE Pervasive Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kitchin, R. and Dodge, M. 2007. Rethinking Maps. Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kling, R. 2000. Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16(3), 217--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Satchell, C. 2006. Cultural Theory: From Armchair Critic to Star Performer. Proc. OzCHI 2006 (Sydney, Australia), 199--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like A State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., and Kaye, J. 2005. Reflective Design. Proc. Fourth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Star, S. L. 1999. The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Suchman, L. 1993. Do Categories have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 2, 177--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Suchman, L. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Valverde, M. 2004. Seeing Like A City: Legal Tools of Urban Ordering. Paper presented at Symposium on "Genealogies of the Legal," UC Irvine, Irvine, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Seeing like an interface

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OZCHI '07: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces
      November 2007
      323 pages
      ISBN:9781595938725
      DOI:10.1145/1324892

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 November 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      OZCHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate26of42submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader