Teaching and learning in live online classrooms

ABSTRACT

Online presence of information and services is pervasive. Teaching and learning are no exception. Courseware management systems play an important role in enhancing instructional delivery for either traditional day, full-time students or non-traditional evening, party-time adult learners enrolled in online programs. While online course management tools are with no doubt practical, they limit, however, live or synchronous communication to "chat" rooms, whose discourse has little in common with face-to-face class communication. A more recent trend in online teaching and learning is the adoption and integration of web conferencing tools to enable live online classrooms and recreate the ethos of traditional face-to-face sessions.

In this paper we present the experience we have had with the adoption of the LearnLinc® web conferencing tool, an iLinc Communications, Inc. product. We have coupled LearnLinc with Blackboard®, for the online and hybrid computer science courses we offered in the past academic year in the evening undergraduate and graduate computer science programs at Rivier College. Twelve courses, enrolling over 150 students, have used the synchronous online teaching capabilities of LearnLinc. Students who took courses in the online or hybrid format could experience a comparable level of interaction, participation, and collaboration as in traditional classes.

We solicited student feedback by administering a student survey to over 100 students. The 55% response rate produced the data for this paper's study. We report on the study's findings and show students' rankings of evaluation criteria applied to hybrid and online instructional formats, with or without a web conferencing tool. Our analysis shows that students ranked favorably LearnLinc live sessions added to Blackboard-only online classes. In addition, how they learned in live online classrooms was found to be the closest to the hybrid class experience with regard to teaching practices they perceived as most important to them, such as seeking instructor's assistance, managing time on task, and exercising problem solving skills.

References

1. Allen, I. E. and Seaman, J. Making the grade: online education in the United States, 2006. Sloan Consortium, 2006. At http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/making_the_grade.pdf. Accessed Juy 2007.
2. Aman, J. R. and Shirvani, S. 2006. Dick and Jane online: considering online coursework. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21, 3 (Feb. 2006), 131--138.
3. Bhagyavati, Kurkovsky, S., and Whitehead, C. C. 2005. Using asynchronous discussions to enhance student participation in CS courses. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science education (St. Louis, Missouri, USA, February 23--27, 2005). SIGCSE '05. ACM Press, New York, NY, 111--115.
4. Bower, M. and Richards, D. 2005. The impact of virtual classroom laboratories in CSE. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (St. Louis, Missouri, USA, February 23--27, 2005). SIGCSE '05. ACM Press, New York, NY, 292--296.
5. Bower, M. 2006. Virtual classroom pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Houston, Texas, USA, March 03--05, 2006). SIGCSE '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, 148--152.
6. Bower, M. 2006. A learning system engineering approach to developing online courses. In Proceedings of the 8th Australian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 52 (Hobart, Australia, January 16--19, 2006). D. Tolhurst and S. Mann, Eds. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 165. Australian Computer Society, Darlinghurst, Australia, 45--54.
7. Bower, M. 2007. Groupwork activities in synchronous online classroom spaces. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Covington, Kentucky, USA, March 07--11, 2007). SIGCSE'07. ACM Press, New York, NY, 91--95.
8. Chickering, A. W. and Gamson, Z. F. 1987. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 7, 3--7.
9. Grandon, E. E., Alshare, K., and Kwun, O. 2005. Factors influencing student intention to adopt online classes: a cross-cultural study. J. Comput. Small Coll. 20, 4 (Apr. 2005), 46--56.
10. Heeler, P. and Hardy, C. 2005. A preliminary report on the use of video technology in online courses. J. Comput. Small Coll. 20, 4 (Apr. 2005), 127--133.
11. Matzen, R and Alrifai, R. 2006. Teaching computing on the web: a survey of computer science faculty. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21, 4 (Apr. 2006), 76--82.
12. Nelson, M., Bhagyavati, Miles, G., Settle, A., Shaffer, D., Watts, J., and Webber, R. P. 2005. Online teaching practices (both best and worst). J. Comput. Small Coll. 21, 2 (Dec. 2005), 223--230.
13. Pelz, B. 2004. (My) three principles of effective online pedagogy. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8, 3 (June 2004). Sloan Consortium. At http://aln.org/publications/jaln/v8n3/v8n3_pelz.asp. Accessed July 2007.
14. Pullen, J. M. 2006. Scaling up a distance education program in computer science. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual SIGCSE Conference on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Bologna, Italy, June 26--28, 2006). ITICSE '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, 33--37.
15. Sheard, J. 2004. Electronic learning communities: strategies for establishment and management. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual SIGCSE Conference on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Leeds, United Kingdom, June 28--30, 2004). ITiCSE '04. ACM Press, New York, NY, 37--41.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Education

    • Computer-managed instruction

    • Distance learning

    • E-learning

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education

        • Information systems education