ABSTRACT
Issues of scaling are critical when an infrastructure is trying to grow. Systems that worked well with smaller numbers or particular types of users must change to meet the needs of an expanding and diversified user base. A first step toward growth is to cultivate new users. We present results from research that examines one approach to the challenge of attracting new users to a large-scale computing infrastructure. We describe gateway organizations and the important social and technical support they provide, which help potential users to conceptualize a use for the infrastructure and increase their willingness and ability to use it.
- Atkins, D., et al. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC, USA, 2003.Google Scholar
- Bansler, J., and Havn, E. Technology-use mediation: Making sense of electronic communication in an organizational context. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '03) (Sanibel Island, Florida, November 9--12, 2003), ACM Press, New York, NY, 2003, 135--143. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Catlett, C., Beckman, P., Skow, D., and Foster, I. Creating and operating national-scale cyberinfrastructure services. CTWatch Quarterly, 2, 2, (May, 2006), 2--10.Google Scholar
- Damsgaard, J., and Lyytinen, K. The role of intermediating institutions in the diffusion of electronic data interchange (EDI): How industry associations intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong. The Information Society 17, (2001), 195--201.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David, P., and Bunn, J. The economics of gateway technologies and network evolution: Lessons from electricity supply history. Information Economics and Policy, 3 (1988), 165--202. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davis, F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3, (1989), 319--339.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edwards, P., Jackson, S., Bowker, G., and Knobel, C. Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design. Report of a Workshop on History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures. University of Michigan, School of Information, Ann Arbor, MI. 2007.Google Scholar
- Ellisman, M. Cyberinfrastructure and the future of collaborative work. Issues in Science and Technology, 22, 1 (Fall, 2005), 43--50.Google Scholar
- Lawrence, K. A. Walking the tightrope: The balancing acts of a large e-Research project. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 15 (2006), 385--411. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee, C., Dourish, P., and Mark, G. The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '06) (Banff, Alberta, Canada, November 4-8, 2006). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2006, 483--492. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lynch, C. Research libraries engage the digital world: A US-UK comparative examination of recent history and future prospects. Ariadne 46 (2006). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue46/lynch/Google Scholar
- McCray, W. Large telescopes and the moral economy of recent astronomy. Social Studies of Science 30, 5, (2000)685--711.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McGrath, O. Balancing act: Community and local requirements in an open source development process. In Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User Services (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, November 5-8, 2006). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2006, 240--244. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Monteiro, E. Scaling information infrastructure: The case of next-generation IP in the Internet. The Information Society 14 (1998), 229--245Google ScholarCross Ref
- National Research Council. Getting up to Speed: The Future of Supercomputing. National Academies Press, 2005.Google Scholar
- Orlikowski, W. J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., and Fujimoto, M. Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science, 6, 4 (July-August 1995), 423--444.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Proctor, R., et al. Usability research challenges for cyberinfrastructure and tools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06) (Montreal, Ontario, April 22--27, 2006). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2000, 1675--1678. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ribes, D., and Finholt, T. A. Tensions across the scales: Planning infrastructure for the long-term. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '07) (Sanibel Island, Florida, November 4--7, 2007), ACM Press, New York, NY, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, E. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. Free Press, New York, 2003.Google Scholar
- Saxena, K. B. C., and Wagenaar, R. W. Critical success factors of EDI technology transfer: A conceptual framework. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Information Systems (Athens, Greece, 1995), 57--74.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, K., and Bannon, L. Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1 (1992), 7--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Senkowsky, S. NEON: Planning for a new frontier in biology. BioScience 53, 5 (2003), 456--461Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonnenwald, D. Expectations for a scientific collaboratory: A case study. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '03) (Sanibel Island, Florida, November 9--12, 2003), ACM Press, New York, NY, 2003, 68--74. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Star, S. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43, 3 (November/December, 1999), 377--391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Star S., and Ruhleder K. The ecology of infrastructure: Problems in the implementation of large-scale information systems. Information System Research 7 (1996), 111--134.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Swan, J. A., and Newell, S. The role of professional associations in technology diffusion. Organization Studies 16, 5, (1995), 847--874.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Venkatesh, V., et al. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27, 3 (September 2003), 425--478. Google ScholarCross Ref
- West, J. E. Supercomputing in the participation age. HPC Wire 16, 14 (April 6, 2007). http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc/1351683.hmtlGoogle Scholar
- Wilkins-Diehr, N. Special issue: Science Gateways-common community interfaces to grid resources. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 19, 6, (2006), 743--749. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zimmerman, A., and Nardi, B. Whither or whether HCI: Requirements analysis for multi-sited, multi-user cyberinfrastructures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06) (Montreal, Ontario, April 22-27, 2006). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2000, 1601--1606. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
Growing an infrastructure: the role of gateway organizations in cultivating new communities of users
Recommendations
What is cyberinfrastructure
SIGUCCS '10: Proceedings of the 38th annual ACM SIGUCCS fall conference: navigation and discoveryCyberinfrastructure is a word commonly used but lacking a single, precise definition. One recognizes intuitively the analogy with infrastructure, and the use of cyber to refer to thinking or computing -- but what exactly is cyberinfrastructure as ...
The Organization and Management of Grid Infrastructures
Grid computing technology has become fundamental to e-Science. As the virtual organizations established by scientific communities progress from testing their applications to more routine usage, maintaining reliable and adaptive grid infrastructures ...
Use of accounting concepts to study research: return on investment in XSEDE, a US cyberinfrastructure service
AbstractThis paper uses accounting concepts—particularly the concept of Return on Investment (ROI)—to reveal the quantitative value of scientific research pertaining to a major US cyberinfrastructure project (XSEDE—the eXtreme Science and Engineering ...
Comments