skip to main content
10.1145/1298306.1298339acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Network loss inference with second order statistics of end-to-end flows

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 October 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

We address the problem of calculating link loss rates from end-to-end measurements. Contrary to existing works that use only the average end-to-end loss rates or strict temporal correlations between probes, we exploit second-order moments of end-to-end flows. We first prove that the variances of link loss rates can be uniquely calculated from the covariances of the measured end-to-end loss rates in any realistic topology. After calculating the link variances, we remove the un-congested links with small variances from the first-order moment equations to obtain a full rank linear system of equations, from which we can calculate precisely the loss rates of the remaining congested links. This operation is possible because losses due to congestion occur in bursts and hence the loss rates of congested links have high variances. On the contrary, most links on the Internet are un-congested, and hence the averages and variances of their loss rates are virtually zero. Our proposed solution uses only regular unicast probes and thus is applicable in today's Internet. It is accurate and scalable, as shown in our simulations and experiments on PlanetLab.

References

  1. A. Adams, T. Bu, T. Friedman, J. Horowitz, D. Towstey, R. Caceres, N. Duffield, F. L. Presti, S. B. Moon, and V. Paxson. The use of end-to-end multicast measurements for characterizing internal network behavior. IEEE Communications Magazine, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Akella, S. Seshan, and A. Shaikh. An empirical evaluation of wide-area internet bottlenecks. In Proc. IMC 03, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. K. Anagnostakis, M. Greenwald, and R. Ryger. Cing: Measuring network internal delays using only existing infrastructure. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. Arifler, G. de Veciana, and B. L. Evans. A factor analysis approach to inferring congestion sharing based on flow level measurements. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Augustin, X. Cuvellier, B. Orgogozo, F. Viger, T. Friedman, M. Latapy, C. Magnien, and R. Teixeira. Avoiding traceroute anomalies with paris traceroute. In Proc. of the Internet Measurement Conference, October 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. Bu, N. Duffield, F. L. Presti, and D. Towsley. Network tomography on general topologies. In Proceedings ACM Sigmetrics 2002, Marina Del Rey, CA, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. Caceres, N. G. Duffield, J. Horowitz, and D. Towsley. Multicast-based inference of network-internal loss characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 45:2462--2480, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Cao, D. Davis, S. V. Wiel, and B. Yu. Time-varying network tomography: Router link data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(452):1063--1075, Dec. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Chen, J. Cao, and T. Bu. Network tomography: Identifiability and fourier domain estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom, Alaska, May 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Chen, D. Bindel, H. Song, and R. H. Katz. An algebraic approach to practical and scalable overlay network monitoring. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM, Portland, August-September 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Coates, A. Hero, R. Nowak, and B. Yu. Internet tomography. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19, May 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Coates and R. Nowak. Network loss inference using unicast end-to-end measurement. In Proceedings of the ITC Seminar on IP Traffic, Measurements and Modelling, Monterey, September 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. Duffield, F. L. Presti, V. Paxson, and D. Towsley. Inferring link loss using striped unicast probes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom 2001, Alaska, April 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. N. G. Duffield. Network tomography of binary network performance characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(12):5373--5388, Dec. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. H. Golub and C. F. V. Loan. Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L. P. Hansen. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50:1029--1054, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K. Harfoush, A. Bestavros, and J. Byers. Robust identification of shared losses using end-to-end unicast probes. In Proc. of ICNP'00, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. V. Jacobson. traceroute, ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/traceroute.tar.z, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. S. Kim, T. Kim, Y. S. Hin, S. S. Lam, and E. J. Powers. A wavelet-based approach to detect shared congestion. In Proceeding of the ACM SIGCOMM'04, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. Mahajan, N. Spring, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson. User-level internet path diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP'03), pages 106--119, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. Medina, I. Matta, and J. Byers. On the origin of power-laws in internet topologies. ACM Computer Communication Review, pages 160--163, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. X. Nguyen and P. Thiran. The boolean solution to the congested IP link location problem: Theory and practice. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2007, May 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. U. of Oregon Route Views Archive Project. http://www.routeviews.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. V. N. Padmanabhan, L. Qiu, and H. J. Wang. Server-based inference of internet performance. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM'03, San Francisco, CA, April 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Roughan. Fundamental bounds on the accuracy of network performance measurements. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D. Rubenstein, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley. Detecing shared congestion of flows via end-to-end measurement. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 10(3), June 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J. Sommers, P. Barford, N. Duffield, and A. Ron. Improving accuracy in end-to-end packet loss measurement. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, August 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. N. Spring, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson. Scriptroute: A public internet measurement facility. In USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Y. Tsang, M. Coates, and R. Nowak. Passive network tomography using the EM algorithms. In Proc. IEEE ICASSP., 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Y. Vardi. Network tomography: Estimating source-destination traffic intensities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91:365--377, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. V. Paxson. end-to-end routing behaviour in the internet. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Aug 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. V. Paxson. End-to-end internet packet dynamics. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM, Sep 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. www.netdimes.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. www.planet-lab.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Y. Zhang, N. Duffield, V. Paxson, and S. Shenker. On the constancy of internet path properties. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop, San Francisco, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Y. Zhao, Y. Chen, and D. Bindel. Toward unbiased end-to-end network diagnosis. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Pisa, Italy, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Network loss inference with second order statistics of end-to-end flows

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IMC '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement
        October 2007
        390 pages
        ISBN:9781595939081
        DOI:10.1145/1298306

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 October 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        IMC '24
        ACM Internet Measurement Conference
        November 4 - 6, 2024
        Madrid , AA , Spain

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader