Patricia Sullivan
- Campbell, R. L., Mack, R. L., & Roemer, J. M. (1989). Extending the scope of field research in HCI. SIGCHI Bulletin, 20, 4, 30-32.Google Scholar
- Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1985). Usability specification as a tool in iterative development. In Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, H. R. Hartson (ed.), Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 1-28.Google Scholar
- Denning, S. (1991). The advantages of focus groups in usability research. Microsoft Corporation, unpublished mss.Google Scholar
- Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive Interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Dieli, M. (1988, Oct.). Integrating usability evaluation into the computer documentation development cycle, Paper presented at the ACM SIGDOC Conference, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
- Dieli, M. (1986). Designing successful documentation: An investigation of document evaluation methods. Dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
- Doheny-Farina, S., and Odell, L. (1985). Ethnographic research on writing: Assumptions and methodology (pp. 503- 535). L. Odell and D. Goswami (eds.). Writing in nonacademic settings. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Eisner, E. W., & Peshkin, A. (1990). Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step-by-step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. L. (1986). Linking data. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fowler, F. J., Jr. (1984). Survey research methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Gardiner, M. M., & Christie, B. (Eds.). (1987). Applying cognitive psychology to user-interface design. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goldman, A. E., & McDonald, S. S. (1987). The group indepth interview, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.Google Scholar
- Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28, no. 3 (1985), 300-311. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hirschheim, R. A. (1986). Understanding the office: A social-analytic perspective. A CM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4, 4, 331-344. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Krueger, R. A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lauer, J. M., & Asher, J. W. (1988). Composition research: Empirical designs. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1972). Qualitative analysis: Historical and critical essays. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1956). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. (1990). Traditional dialogue design applied to modem user interfaces. Communications of the ACM, 31, 5, 552-561. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sullivan, P. (1989b). Beyond a narrow conception of usability testing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32, 4, 256-264.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sullivan, P. (1989a). Usability in the computer industry: What contribution can longitudinal field studies make?. I?CC Conference Record, pp. 12-16.Google Scholar
- Van Maanan, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Zemke, R. & Kramlinger, T. (1982). Figuring things out. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Multiple methods and the usability of interface prototypes: the complementarity of laboratory observation and focus groups
Recommendations
Usability inspection methods: report on a workshop held at CHI'92, Monterey, CA, May 3–4, 1992
Usability inspection methods, based on informed intuition s about interface design quality, hold promise of providing faster, more cost-effective ways to generate usability evaluations, compared to empirical user evaluation methods . Examples of ...
User-process model approach to improve user interface usability: Book Reviews
Our purpose in this study is to inductively reorganize software interface menu items based on a user's process model. The proposed menu interface in this study used direct users' input, such as goals and strategies for solving their information needs, ...
Technophobia and user interface usability
This paper aims to explore the relationship between the usability of interfaces and the experience of technophobia. This study hypothesises that an unusable interface will influence user feelings of technophobia. Three hypotheses were formulated by ...
Comments