Abstract
Acoustic analysis of speech signals is a noninvasive technique that has been proved to be an effective tool for the objective support of vocal and voice disease screening. In the present study acoustic analysis of sustained vowels is considered. A simple k-means nearest neighbor classifier is designed to test the efficacy of a harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR) measure and the critical-band energy spectrum of the voiced speech signal as tools for the detection of laryngeal pathologies. It groups the given voice signal sample into pathologic and normal. The voiced speech signal is decomposed into harmonic and noise components using an iterative signal extrapolation algorithm. The HNRs at four different frequency bands are estimated and used as features. Voiced speech is also filtered with 21 critical-bandpass filters that mimic the human auditory neurons. Normalized energies of these filter outputs are used as another set of features. The results obtained have shown that the HNR and the critical-band energy spectrum can be used to correlate laryngeal pathology and voice alteration, using previously classified voice samples. This method could be an additional acoustic indicator that supplements the clinical diagnostic features for voice evaluation.
- {1} I. R. Titze, Principles of Voice Production, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1994.Google Scholar
- {2} M. Hirano, S. Hibi, R. Terasawa, and M. Fujiu, "Relationship between aerodynamic, vibratory, acoustic and psychoacoustic correlates in dysphonia," Journal of Phonetics, vol. 14, pp. 445-456, 1986.Google Scholar
- {3} S. B. Davis, "Acoustic characteristics of laryngeal pathology," in Speech Evaluation in Medicine, J. Darby, Ed., pp. 77-104, Grune and Stratton, New York, NY, USA, 1981.Google Scholar
- {4} J. H. L. Hansen, L. Gavidia-Ceballos, and J. F. Kaiser, "A non-linear operator-based speech feature analysis method with application to vocal fold pathology assessment," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 300-313, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {5} O. Fujimura and M. Hirano, Vocal Fold Physiology-Voice Quality Control, Singular, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1995.Google Scholar
- {6} R. J. Baken and R. F. Orlikoff, Clinical Measurements of Speech and Voice, Singular Thomson Learning, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2000.Google Scholar
- {7} R. D. Kent and C. Read, The Acoustic Analysis of Speech, AITBS, New Delhi, India, 1995.Google Scholar
- {8} L. Gavidia-Ceballos and J. H. L. Hansen, "Direct speech feature estimation using an iterative EM algorithm for vocal fold pathology detection," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 373-383, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {9} D. G. Childers, "Signal processing methods for the assessment of vocal disorders," The Journal of Biomedical Engineering Society of India, vol. 13, pp. 117-130, 1994.Google Scholar
- {10} N. B. Pinto and I. R. Titze, "Unification of perturbation measures in speech signals," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 1278-1289, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {11} E. Yumoto, W. J. Gould, and T. Baer, "Harmonics to noise ratio as an index of the degree of hoarseness," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1544-1550, 1982.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {12} H. Kasuya, S. Ogawa, K. Mashima, and S. Ebihara, "Normalized noise energy as an acoustic measure to evaluate pathologic voice," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1329-1334, 1986.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {13} C. Manfredi, "Adaptive noise energy estimation in pathological speech signals," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1538-1543, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {14} M. de Oliveira Rosa, J. C. Pereira, and M. Grellet, "Adaptive estimation of residue signal for voice pathology diagnosis," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 96-104, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {15} F. Plant, H. Kessler, B. Cheetham, and J. Earis, "Speech monitoring of infective laryngitis," in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP '96), vol. 2, pp. 749-752, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, October 1996.Google Scholar
- {16} D. Michaelis, T. Gramss, and H. W. Strube, "Glottal to noise excitation ratio-a new measure for describing pathological voices," Acustica - Acta Acustica, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 700-706, 1997.Google Scholar
- {17} D. Michaelis, M. Fröhlich, and H. W. Strube, "Selection and combination of acoustic features for the description of pathologic voices," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 1628-1639, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {18} Anantha krishna, K. Shama, and U. C. Niranjan, "k-Means nearest neighbor classifier for voice pathology," in Proceedings of IEEE India Annual Conference (INDICON '04), pp. 232-234, IIT-Kharagpur, India, December 2004.Google Scholar
- {19} E. Zwicker and H. Fastl, Psycho-Acoustics: Facts and Models, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {20} Kay Elemetrics Corp, Disordered Voice Database Model 4337, Version 1.03, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Voice and Speech Lab, 2002.Google Scholar
- {21} B. Yegnanarayana, C. d'Alessandro, and V. Darsinos, "An iterative algorithm for decomposition of speech signals into periodic and aperiodic components," IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {22} C. Wendt and A. Petropulu, "Pitch determination and speech segmentation using the discrete wavelet transform," in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS '96), vol. 2, pp. 45-48, Atlanta, Ga, USA, May 1996.Google Scholar
- {23} S. Mallat and S. Zhong, "Characterization of signals from multiscale edges," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 710-732, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {24} T. F. Quatieri, Discrete-Time Speech Signal Processing, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {25} S. H. Chen and J. F. Wang, "Noise-robust pitch detection method using wavelet transform with aliasing compensation," IEE Proceedings, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 327-334, 2002.Google Scholar
- {26} A. Papoulis, Signal Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, Int. edition, 1984.Google Scholar
- {27} G. K. Parikh and P. C. Loizou, "The effects of noise on the spectrum of speech," a M.S. thesis presented to the faculty of Telecommunication Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, August 2002.Google Scholar
- {28} W. A. Yost, Fundamentals of Hearing, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1994.Google Scholar
- {29} R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, Pattern Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2002.Google Scholar
- {30} B. Boyanov and S. Hadjitodorov, "Acoustic analysis of pathological voices. A voice analysis system for the screening of laryngeal diseases," IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 74-82, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {31} J. B. Alonso, J. de Leon, I. Alonso, and M. A. Ferrer, "Automatic detection of pathologies in the voice by HOS based parameters," EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, vol. 2001, no. 4, pp. 275-284, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {32} J. I. Godino-Llorente and P. Gomez-Vilda, "Automatic detection of voice impairments by means of short-term cepstral parameters and neural network based detectors," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 380-384, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {33} K. Umapathi, S. Krishnan, V. Parsa, and D. G. Jamieson, "Discrimination of pathological voices using a time-frequency approach," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 421-430, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {34} D. R. Boone, The Voice and Voice Therapy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1988.Google Scholar
- {35} J. A. Koufman and P. D. Blalock, "Functional voice disorders," in Oto Laryngological Clinics of North America. Voice Disorders, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1059-1073, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, October 1991.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Study of harmonics-to-noise ratio and critical-band energy spectrum of speech as acoustic indicators of laryngeal and voice pathology
Recommendations
Voice data mining for laryngeal pathology assessment
The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of different methods of speech signal analysis in the detection of voice pathologies. Firstly, an initial vector was created consisting of 28 parameters extracted from time, frequency and cepstral ...
Cepstrum-based harmonics-to-noise ratio measurement in voiced speech
Nonlinear Speech Modeling and ApplicationsThe estimation of the harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR) in voiced speech provides an indication of the ratio between the periodic to aperiodic components of the signal. Time-domain methods for HNR estimation are problematic because of the difficulty of ...
Harmonic to noise ratio improvement in oesophageal speech
BACKGROUND: This manuscript presents oesophageal speech enhancement. Patients who have undergone a laryngectomy as a result of larynx cancer, that is, laryngectomees, have communication problems. Due to removal of the larynx, oesophageal speech has extremely ...
Comments