Challenging the advanced first-year student's learning process through student presentations

ABSTRACT

The decline in computing enrollments is a global concern that necessitates that every potentially successful computing student be targeted for support and development. The needs of technically experienced, highly capable first-term college students are unique, and no less challenging than the needs of their lesser-prepared peers. In order to attract advanced first-year students to further computing studies, we need to understand better how instruction can meet their needs. This paper reports the results of a study in which advanced first-term computing students were challenged to become in-depth researcher-learners and to teach the content they acquired to their peers. The results demonstrate that students and instructors alike perceive that the students made significant improvements in communication, presentation, and teaming skills and acquired deep content knowledge from their experience in the course. The data also show that students were extremely uncomfortable with the paradigm shift in their learning environment. These results suggest that anxiety-reducing changes are needed for the course, but that overall, the teacher-researcherlearner concept is very beneficial for increasing the understanding and learning of advanced first year computing students.

References

1. Allert, James D. The effectiveness of innovative approaches to CS1: Comparing opinion to outcome. In Proceedings of the 27th Australasian Computer Sciences Conference. (Dunedin, New Zealand, 2004), 151--157.
2. Bargh, J. A. and Schul, Y. The cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72 (1980), 593--604.
3. Bayliss, Jessica D. and Strout, Sean. Games as a "flavor" of CS1. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Houston, Texas, USA, March 1-5, 2006), 500--504.
4. Benware, C. A. and Deci, E. L. The quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21 (1984), 755--766.
5. Bruce, Kim B. Attracting (& keeping) the best and the brightest: An entry-level course for experienced introductory students. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 1994), 243--247.
6. Carbone, Angela. Attracting and retaining the best students -- A first year advanced students' project scheme. In Proceedings of the Second Australasian Computing Education Conference (Melbourne, Australia, July 2-4, 1997), 141--148.
7. CC2001 Task Force. Computing Curricula 2001: Computer Science Volume. Retrieved April 29, 2007 from http://www.sigcse.org/cc2001/
8. Carter, Lori. Why students with an apparent aptitude in computer science don't choose to major in computer science. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Houston, Texas, USA, March 1-5, 2006), 27--31.
9. Cassel, Lillian, et al. Special Session. The current crisis in computing: What are the real issues? In Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Covington, Kentucky, USA, March 7-10, 2007), 329--330.
10. Ching, E., Chen, C.-T., Chou, C.-Y., Deng, Y.-C., and Chan, T.-W. A pilot study of computer supported learning by constructing instruction notes and peer expository instruction. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years! (Taipei, Taiwan, 2005), 63--67.
11. Dankel, Douglas D. II, and Ohlrich, Jonathan. Students teaching students: Incorporating presentations into a course. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Covington, Kentucky, USA, March 7-10, 2007), 96--99.
12. Falchikov, Nancy. Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education. Routledge Falmer , London, UK, 2001.
13. Gonzalez, Graciela. A systematic approach to active and cooperative learning in CS1 and its effects on CS2. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Houston, Texas, USA, March 1-5, 2006), 133--137.
14. Gruba, Paul and Al-Mahmood, Reem. Strategies for communication skills development. In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Computing Education Conference (Dunedin, New Zealand, 2004), 101--107.
15. Howles, Trudy. Preliminary results of a longitudinal study of computer science student trends, behaviors and preferences. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges. 22,6 (2007), 18--27.
16. Kaczmarczyk, Lisa C., Last, Mary Z. and Miikkulainen, Risto. The effect of delivery method on conceptual and strategy development. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Vancouver, British Columbia, July 26-29, 2006).
17. King, Patricia M. and Strohm Kitchener, Karen. Developing Reflective Judgment. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1994.
18. Kinnunen, Päivi and Malmi, Lauri. Why students drop out CS1 course? In Proceedings of the 2006 International Education Research Workshop (Canterbury, UK, September 9-10, 2006), 97--108.
19. Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd Edition. The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 1970.
20. Lui, Chang. Using tracking tools to facilitate student learning of communication skills in software engineering courses. 18th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET) (Ottawa, Canada, April 18-20, 2005), 61--68.
21. Miles, Matthew B. and Huberman, A. Michael. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd Edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994.
22. Oborne, Lawrence. Thinking, speaking, writing for freshmen. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Houston, Texas, USA, March 1-5, 2006), 112--116.
23. Okita, Sandra Y. and Schwartz, Daniel L. When observation beats doing: Learning by teaching. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences (Bloomington, IN, USA, 2006), 509--515.
24. Plimmer, Beryl and Amor, Robert. Peer teaching extends HCI learning. In Proceedings of the 11th SIGCSE Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Bologna, Italy, June 26-28, 2006), 53--57.
25. Pollack, Lori. Integrating an intensive experience with communications skills development into a computer science course. In Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Charleston, North Carolina, USA, 2001), 287--291.
26. Rao, M.R.K. Krishna. Infusing critical thinking skills into content of AI course. In Proceedings of the 10th SIGCSE Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Monte de Caparica, Portugal, June 27-29, 2005), 173--177.
27. Reges, Stuart. Back to basics in CS1 and CS2. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Houston, Texas, USA, March 1-5, 2006), 293--297.
28. Roberts, Eric. Strategies for encouraging individual achievement in introductory computer science courses. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Austin, Texas, USA, 2000), 295--299.
29. Ryan, Sherry D., Bordoloi, Bijoy, and Harrison, David A. Acquiring conceptual data modeling skills: The effect of cooperative learning and self-efficacy on learning outcomes. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 31, 4 (Fall, 2000), 9--24.
30. Sabin, R. E. and Sabin, E. P. Collaborative learning in an introductory computer science course. SIGCSE Bulletin, 23, 1 (1994), 304--308.
31. Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000 . Washington DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 1991. Retrieved April 29, 2007, from http://wdr.doleta.gov/SCANS/whatwork/.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education

      • Model curricula