skip to main content
10.1145/1287624.1287700acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A behavioural model for product families

Published:07 September 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we propose a behavioural model, namely the Extended Modal Labeled Transition Systems, as a basis for the formalization of the different notions of variability usually present in product families definitions. In particular, an EMLTS is able to define a family of products by telling at any state of the system whether transitions are optional or compulsory for the products of the family. Based on this model, verification that a product belongs to a family can be carried out by means of automatic tools.

References

  1. A. Bertolino, A. Fantechi, S. Gnesi, G. Lami, A. Maccari, Use Case Description of Requirements for Product Lines, REPL'02, Essen, Germany, September 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. C. Clements and L. Northrop. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, August 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Cockburn, Writing Eective Use Cases. Addison Wesley, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Fischbein, S, Uchitel, Sebastian, V. Braberman, A Foundation for Behavioural Conformance in Software Product Line Architectures, 2nd ROSATEA Workshop, Portland, Maine, 2006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Jazayeri, A. Ran, F. van der Linden, Software Architecture for Product Families: Principles and Practice, Publishers: Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. and London, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. Kakola (Ed.), Software Product Lines: Research Issues in Engineering And Management, Springer-Verlag, October 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K.G. Larsen, U. Nyman, A. Wasowski. Modal I/O Automata for Interface and Product Line Theories. ESOP'07, LNCS 4421, Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. K.G. Larsen, L. Xinxin, Equation solving using modal transition systems, LICS 1990, IEEE CS.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. H. Schmid, H. Fecher, Comparing Disjunctive Modal Transition Systems with an One-Selecting Variant, NWPT'06, Reykjavik, Iceland, October2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A behavioural model for product families

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ESEC-FSE '07: Proceedings of the the 6th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering
          September 2007
          638 pages
          ISBN:9781595938114
          DOI:10.1145/1287624

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 September 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate112of543submissions,21%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader