skip to main content
10.1145/1282040.1282064acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

What is "computer animation"?: examining technological advancements and cultural aesthetics of Japanese animation

Published:05 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper begins with the argument that technology is not simply a tool or means employed to deliver contents or ideas; rather, technologies are themselves constructed, and further acquire cultural meaning through divergent understanding of the visual (Eisenhauer, 2006). By investigating current narratives in the United States and Japan's deployment of computer animation, this paper argues that at different socio-cultural contexts "computer animation" acquires its cultural meaning and styles, and re-constitutes a specific cultural aesthetic for the society it resides. I first examine three current narratives of computer animation in the United States: (1) the ideological driven by the search of perfect representation of reality, (2) the mythological based on a modernist paradigm of progression, and (3) the hegemonic leading a habitual mode of production. It is suggested that computer animation were developed to approach virtually indistinguishable images from live action recording, to process a phenomenological illusion of reality, and to sustain the long ideological tradition in the West---cinema as a total representation of the real (Lamarre, 2006; Manovich, 2000, 2001). Research of computer animation tends to center on what technologies can do, and production is driven by a hegemonic mode that deploys computer animation as a genre of hyperrealism. Hence, discourses on computer animation risk falling into a constant search for "progression" through technological advancements and innovations whereas this search may merely resemble a modernist paradigm and functions as repetitions of Western cinema traditions.

By examining Japanese animation Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children (2005), I identify a divergent perception through which computer animation acquires its cultural meaning and aesthetics: the hyper-spectacle embedded in a superflat culture and the tradition of contingency. This animation discussed reveals more about cultural understanding of the visual than it does about the effectiveness of using particular technologies. Finally, this paper suggests studies not locating "computer animation" in machines or tools as a neutral object, rather, to explore that "computer animation" is discursively constituted by and through culture, and how it constantly acquires its aesthetic and meaning in society.

References

  1. Azuma, H. (2001). Superflat Japanese postmodernity. Retrieved April 29, 2006, from http://www.hirokiazuma.com/en/texts/superflat_en1.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Azuma, H., & Murakami, T. (2000). Superflat. Tokyo: Madra.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. Glaster, Trans.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bazin, A. (1999). What is cinema. In L. Braudy & M. Cohen (Eds.), Film theory and criticism: Introductory readings (pp. 408--418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eisenhauer, J. F. (2006). Next slide please: The magical, scientific, and corporate discourses of visual projection technologies. Studies in Art Education, 47(3), 198--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jameson, F. (1998). Postmodernism and consumer society. In The cultural turn. London: Verso.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lamarre, T. (2004). An introduction to Otaku movement. EnterText, 4(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lamarre, T. (2006). The first time as farce: Digital animation and repetition of cinema. In S. T. Brown (Ed.), Cinema anime: Critical engagements with Japanese animation. New York: Palgrave macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Looser, T. (2002). From Edogawa to Miyazaki: cinematic and anime-ic architectures of early and late twentieth-century Japan. Japan Forum, 14(2), 297--327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Manovich, L. (2000). What is digital cinema? In P. Lunenfeld (Ed.), The digital dialectic: New essays on new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Manovich, L. (2006). Image future. Retrieved Nov. 19, 2006, from http://www.manovich.net/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Miyazaki, H. (Writer) (1997). Princess Mononoke. Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Miyazaki, H. (Writer) (2004). Howl's Moving Castle. In T. Suzuki (Producer). Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Morita, S. (Writer) (2005). Kakurenbo: Hide and Seek {DVD}. In S. Morita (Producer). Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Murakami, T. (2005). Little Boy: The art of Japan's exploding subculture. New York: Japan Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nomura, T., & Nozue, T. (Writer) (2005). Final fantasy VII: Advent children. In S. Hashimoto & Y. Kitase (Producer), Final fantasy. USA: Square-Enix.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pixar. (2006). Corporate overview: Introduction. Retrieved Nov. 9, 2006, from http://www.pixar.com/companyinfo/about_us/overview.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sakaguchi, H., & Sakaguchi, M. (Writer) (2001). Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within {DVD}. In J. Aida (Producer). USA/Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tatsuo, S. (Writer) (2001). Cat Soup. In M. Yuasa (Producer). Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader