skip to main content
article
Free Access

Testing object-oriented industrial software without precise oracles or results

Published:01 August 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

TACCLE tests an automated assembly system in which the expected outcomes cannot be precisely defined and the actual results cannot be directly observed.

References

  1. Andrews, J.H. and Zhang, Y. General test result checking with log file analysis. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 29, 7 (July 2003), 634--648. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beizer, B. Software Testing Techniques. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brand, D. and Zafiropulo, P. On communicating finite-state machines. Journal of the ACM 30, 2 (Apr. 1983), 323--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, H.Y., Tse, T.H., and Chen, T.Y. TACCLE: A methodology for object-oriented software testing at the class and cluster levels. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 10, 1 (Jan. 2001), 56--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fetzer, C., Felber, P., and Hogstedt, K. Automatic detection and masking of nonatomic exception handling. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30, 8 (Aug. 2004), 547--560. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Goguen, J.A. and Malcolm, G., Eds. Software Engineering with OBJ: Algebraic Specification in Action. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Milner, R. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science. Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, U.K., 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. National Institute of Standards and Technology. The Economic Impacts of Inadequate Infrastructure for Software Testing. Final Report. Gaithersburg, MD, 2002; www.nist.gov/director/progofc/report02-3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Peters, D.K. and Parnas, D.L. Using test oracles generated from program documentation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24, 3 (Mar. 1998), 161--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. van Gabbeek, R.J. and Weijland, W.P. Branching time and abstraction in bisimulation semantics. Journal of the ACM 43, 3 (May 1996), 555--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Weyuker, E.J. On testing non-testable programs. The Computer Journal 25, 4 (Nov. 1982), 465--470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Briand, L., di Penta, M., and Labiche, Y. Assessing and improving state-based class testing: A series of experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30, 11 (Nov. 2004), 770--793. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Chen, H.Y., Tse, T.H., Chan, F.T., and Chen, T. Y. In black and white: An integrated approach to class-level testing of object-oriented programs. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 7, 3 (July 1998), 250--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Doong, R.-K. and Frankl, P.G. The ASTOOT approach to testing object-oriented programs. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 3, 2 (Apr. 1994), 101--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Pezze, M. and Young, M. Testing object-oriented software. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2004) (Edinburgh, U.K.). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 2004, 739--740. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Testing object-oriented industrial software without precise oracles or results

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image Communications of the ACM
                  Communications of the ACM  Volume 50, Issue 8
                  August 2007
                  94 pages
                  ISSN:0001-0782
                  EISSN:1557-7317
                  DOI:10.1145/1278201
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 2007 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 August 2007

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • article

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader

                HTML Format

                View this article in HTML Format .

                View HTML Format