skip to main content
article

Do I Trust You Online, and If So, Will I Buy? An Empirical Study of Two Trust-Building Strategies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 October 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This research investigates the effectiveness of various trust-building strategies to influence actual buying behavior in online shopping environments, particularly for first-time visitors to an Internet store that does not have an established reputation. Drawing from the literature on trust, we developed a model of how trust-building strategies could affect trust and the consequences of trust. We investigated two trust-building strategies: portal association (based on reputation categorization and trust transference) and satisfied customer endorsements (based on unit grouping, reputation categorization, and trust transference).

A series of two studies was conducted at a large public university in Hong Kong. The first study employed a laboratory experiment to test the model in an online bookstore environment, using a real task that involves actual book purchases. Of the two strategies investigated, satisfied customer endorsement by similar peers, but not portal association, was found to increase consumers' trusting beliefs about the store. This, in turn, positively influenced consumers' attitudes toward the store and their willingness to buy from the store, which ultimately led to actual buying behaviors. To gather further insights on the two Web strategies investigated, a second study was conducted using a questionnaire survey approach. Overall, the findings corroborated those in the first study. Specifically, it shows that endorsements by similar (local, nonforeign) peers, but not by dissimilar (foreign) peers, were effective means of developing trust among first-time visitors to online stores.

References

  1. <!{CDATA{Aaker, D. Managing Brand Equity. New York: Free Press, 1991.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. <!{CDATA{ACNielsen Asia Pacific. 618,000 Hong Kongers now take it to the bank online-Up 67% in 2000. Hong Kong and New York, 2000 (available at www.acnielsen.com.hk/news.asp?newsID=68).}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. <!{CDATA{Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50, 2 (1991), 179-211.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. <!{CDATA{Amoroso, D.L., and Cheney, P.H. Testing a causal model of end-user application effectiveness. Journal of Management Information Systems8, 1 (Summer 1991), 63-89.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. <!{CDATA{Anderson, J.C., and Narus, A. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing54, 1 (1990), 42-58.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. <!{CDATA{Ba, S., and Pavlou, P.A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premium and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly26, 3 (2002), 243-268.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. <!{CDATA{Barclay, D.; Higgins, C.A.; and Thompson, R. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology2, 2 (1995), 285-324.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. <!{CDATA{Bearden, W.O., and Etzel, M.J. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research9, 2 (1982), 183-194.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. <!{CDATA{Berkowitz, E.N.; Kerin, R.A.; Hartley, S.W.; and Rudelins, W. Marketing, 5th ed. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 1997.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. <!{CDATA{Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss. Volume 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books, 1982}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. <!{CDATA{Brewer, M.B. Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M.B. Brewer and B.E. Collins (eds.)Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981, pp. 345-360.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. <!{CDATA{Butler, J.K. Toward understanding and measuring the conditions of trust: Evolution of a condition of trust inventory. Journal of Management17, 3 (1991), 643-663.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. <!{CDATA{Chae, B.; Ju, H.; Yen, R.; and Sheu, C. Information technology and supply chain collaboration: Moderating effects of existing relationships between partners. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management52, 4 (2005), 440-448.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. <!{CDATA{Cheskin Research and Studio Archetype/Sapient. eCommerce trust study. Redwood Shore, CA, January 1999 (available at www.cheskin.com/cms/files/i/articles//17_report-eComm%20Trust1999.pdf).}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. <!{CDATA{Chewelos, P.; Benbasat, I.; and Dexter, A.S. Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research12, 3 (2001), 304-321.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. <!{CDATA{Cook, J., and Wall, T. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need nonfulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology53, 1 (1980), 39-52.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. <!{CDATA{Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T. Quasi-Experiment: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1979.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. <!{CDATA{Deutsch, M. The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations13, 2 (1960), 123-140.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. <!{CDATA{Dishaw, M.T., and Strong, D.M. Extending the technology acceptance model with tasktechnology fit constructs. Information and Management36, 1 (1999), 9-21.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. <!{CDATA{Enos, L. Most e-shoppers abandon carts. E-Commerce Times, October 24, 2000 (available at www.ecommercetimes.com/story/4621.html).}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. <!{CDATA{Erikson, E.H. Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton, 1968.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. <!{CDATA{Falk, R.F., and Miller, N.B. A Primer for Soft Modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press, 1992.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. <!{CDATA{Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. <!{CDATA{Fornell, C. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, Methods, vol. 1. New York: Praeger, 1982.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. <!{CDATA{Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research18, 1 (1981), 39-50.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. <!{CDATA{Frost, T.; Simpson, D.V.; and Maughan, M.R.C. Some correlates of trust. Journal of Psychology99, 1 (1978), 103-108.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. <!{CDATA{Gefen, D. What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: Linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. Journal of Management Information Systems21, 1 (Summer 2004), 263-288.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. <!{CDATA{Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; and Straub, D.W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly27, 1 (2003), 51-90.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. <!{CDATA{Greenspan, R. Retail, e-com sales climbing. ClickZ Network, New York, August 31, 2004 (available at www.clickz.com/stats/sectors/retailing/article.php/3401181).}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. <!{CDATA{Hagel, J., and Singer, M. Net Worth: Shaping Markets When Customers Make the Rules. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1999.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. <!{CDATA{Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L.; and Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. <!{CDATA{Harrison, D.A.; Mykytyn, P.P.J.; and Riemenschneider, C.K. Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: Theory and empirical tests. Information Systems Research8, 2 (1997), 171-195.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. <!{CDATA{Hoffman, D.L.; Novak, T.P.; and Peralta, M. Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM42, 4 (1999), 80-85.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. <!{CDATA{Hofstede, G.H. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. <!{CDATA{Hong, W.; Thong, J.Y.L.; and Tam, K.Y. The effects of information format and shopping task on consumers' online shopping behavior: A cognitive fit perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems21, 3 (Winter 2004-2005), 149-184.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. <!{CDATA{Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Tractinsky, N.; and Vitale, M. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management1, 1-2 (2000), 45-72.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. <!{CDATA{Jiang, Z., and Benbasat, I. Virtual product experience: Effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems21, 3 (Winter 2004-2005), 111-148.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. <!{CDATA{Keen, P.G.W. Are you ready for "trust" economy? Computer World (April 21, 1997), 80.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. <!{CDATA{Kelley, H.H. The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist6, 2 (1973), 107-112.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. <!{CDATA{Koufaris, M. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research13, 2 (2002), 205-223.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. <!{CDATA{Kramer, R.M. The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations. Motivation and Emotion18, 2 (1994), 199-230.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. <!{CDATA{Lee, M.K.O., and Turban, E. Trust in business-to-consumer electronic commerce: A proposed research model and its empirical testing. International Journal of Electronic Commerce6, 1 (Fall 2001), 75-91.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. <!{CDATA{Lewis, J.D., and Weigert, A.J. Social atomism, holism, and trust. Sociological Quarterly26, 4 (1985), 455-471.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. <!{CDATA{Lim, K.H.; Leung, K.; Sia C.L.; and Lee, M.K.O. Is eCommerce boundary-less? Effects of individualism-collectivism and uncertainty avoidance on Internet shopping. Journal of International Business Studies35, 6 (2004), 545-559.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. <!{CDATA{Lin, F.-R.; Sung, Y-.W; and Lo, Y.-P. Effects of trust mechanisms on supply-chain performance: A multi-agent simulation study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce9, 4 (Summer 2005), 91-112.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. <!{CDATA{Luhmann, N. Trust and Power. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1979.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. <!{CDATA{Macintosh, G., and Lockshin, L.W. Retail relationships and store loyalty: A multi-level perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing14, 5 (1997), 487-497.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. <!{CDATA{Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H.; and Schoorman, F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review20, 3 (1995), 709-734.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. <!{CDATA{McGann, R. Most active Web users are young, affluent. ClickZ Network, New York, January 6, 2005 (available at www.clickz.com/stats/sectors/demographics/article.php/3455741).}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. <!{CDATA{McKnight, D.H.; Cummings, L.L.; and Chervany, N.L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review23, 3 (1998), 473-490.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. <!{CDATA{McKnight D.H.; Choudhury, V.; and Kacmar, C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research13, 3 (2002), 334-359.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. <!{CDATA{Meyerson, D.; Weick, K.E.; and Kramer, R.M. Swift trust and temporary groups. In R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds.)Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 166-195.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. <!{CDATA{Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory, 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. <!{CDATA{Pavlou, P.A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce7, 3 (Spring 2003), 101-134.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. <!{CDATA{Ratnasingham, P. The importance of trust in electronic commerce. Internet Research8, 4 (1998), 313-321.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. <!{CDATA{Ring, S.M., and Van de Ven, A.H. Structuring cooperating relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal13, 7 (1992), 483-498.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. <!{CDATA{Saeed, K.A.; Grover, V.; and Hwang, Y. The relationship of e-commerce competence to customer value and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems22, 1 (Summer 2005), 223-256.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. <!{CDATA{Scarborough Research. Almost half of Internet users are buying products or services online. New York, November 28, 2000 (available at www.scarborough.com/press_releases/online%20Buying%2011.28.00.pdf).}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. <!{CDATA{Schurr, P.H., and Ozanne, J.L. Influences on exchange processes: Buyers' preconceptions of a seller's trustworthiness and bargaining toughness. Journal of Consumer Research11, 4 (1985), 939-953.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. <!{CDATA{Shapiro, S.P. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology93, 3 (1987), 623-658.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. <!{CDATA{Siegel, S., and Castellan, N.J.J. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. <!{CDATA{Stewart, K.J. Transference as a means of building trust in World Wide Web sites. In P. De and J.I. DeGross (eds.)Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 1999, pp. 459-464.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. <!{CDATA{Stewart, K.J. Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organization Science14, 1 (2003), 5-15.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. <!{CDATA{Suh, B., and Han, I. The impact of customer trust and perception of security control on the acceptance of electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce7, 3 (Spring 2003), 135-149.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. <!{CDATA{Swan, J.E., and Nolan, J.J. Gaining customer trust: A conceptual guide for the salesperson. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management5, 2 (November 1985), 39-47.}}>>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. <!{CDATA{Taylor Nelson Sofres. TNS interactive global ecommerce report 2002. London, 2002.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. <!{CDATA{Taylor, S., and Todd, P.A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research6, 2 (1995), 144-176.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. <!{CDATA{Uslaner, E.M. Trust online, trust offline. Communications of the ACM47, 4 (2004), 28-29.}}> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. <!{CDATA{Walczuch, R., and Lundgren, H. Psychological antecedents of institution-based consumer trust in e-retailing. Information & Management42, 1 (2004), 159-177}}>> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. <!{CDATA{Wold, H. Systems under indirect observation using PLS. In C. Fornell (ed.)A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis Methods, vol. 1. New York: Praeger, 1982, pp. 325-347.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. <!{CDATA{Zucker, L.G. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.)Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986, pp. 53-111.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. <!{CDATA{Zucker, L.G.; Darby, M.R.; Brewer, M.B.; and Peng, Y. Collaboration structure and information dilemmas in biotechnology: Organizational boundaries as trust production. In R.M. Kramer and T.P. Tyler (eds.)Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 90-113.}}>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Do I Trust You Online, and If So, Will I Buy? An Empirical Study of Two Trust-Building Strategies
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access