Structural alignment based kernels for protein structure classification

ABSTRACT

Structural alignments are the most widely used tools for comparing proteins with low sequence similarity. The main contribution of this paper is to derive various kernels on proteins from structural alignments, which do not use sequence information. Central to the kernels is a novel alignment algorithm which matches substructures of fixed size using spectral graph matching techniques. We derive positive semi-definite kernels which capture the notion of similarity between substructures. Using these as base more sophisticated kernels on protein structures are proposed. To empirically evaluate the kernels we used a 40% sequence non-redundant structures from 15 different SCOP superfamilies. The kernels when used with SVMs show competitive performance with CE, a state of the art structure comparison program.

References

1. Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T. N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I. N., & Bourne, P. E. (2000). The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 235--242.
2. Bertsimas, D., & Tsitsiklis, J. (1997). Introduction to linear optimization. Athena Scientific.
3. Bhattacharya, S., Bhattacharyya, C., & Chandra, N. (2006). Projections for fast protein structure retrieval. BMC Bioinformatics, 7 suppl., 5:S5.
4. Bourne, P. E., & Shindyalov, I. N. (1998). Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension of optimal path. Protein Engineering, 11, 739--747.
5. Bourne, P. E., & Shindyalov, I. N. (2003). Protein structure comparison and alignment. In P. E. Bourne and H. Weissig (Eds.), Structural bioinformatics, 321--337. Wiley-Liss.
6. Eidhammer, I., Jonassen, I., & Taylor, W. R. (2000). Structure comparison and structure patterns. Journal of Computational Biology, 7, 685--716.
7. Haussler, D. (1999). Convolution kernels on discrete structures (Technical Report). University of California, Santa Cruz.
8. Holm, L., & Sander, C. (1993). Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. Journal of Molecular Biology, 233, 123--138.
9. Horn, B. K. P. (1987). Closed form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 4, 629--642.
10. J.-P. Vert, H. Saigo, T. A. (2004). Kernel methods in computational biology, chapter Local alignment kernels for biological sequences, 131--154. MIT Press.
11. Jaakkola, T., Diekhaus, M., & Haussler, D. (1999). Using the fisher kernel method to detect remote protein homologies. 7th Intell. Sys. Mol. Biol., 149--158.
12. Leslie, C., & Kwang, R. (2004). Fast string kernels using inexact matching for protein sequences. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5, 1435 -- 1455.
13. Murzin, A. G., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T., & Chothia, C. (1995). Scop: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. Journal of Molecular Biology, 247, 536--540.
14. Pardalos, P., Rendl, F., & Wolkowicz, H. (1994). The quadratic assignment problem: a survey and recent developments. In P. Pardalos and H. Wolkowicz (Eds.), Quadratic assignment and related problems (new brunswick, NJ, 1993), 1--42. Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc.
15. Schölkopf, B., Weston, J., Eskin, E., Leslie, C. S., & Noble, W. S. (2002). A kernel approach for learning from almost orthogonal patterns. ECML (pp. 511--528).
16. Umeyama, S. (1988). An eigendecomposition approach to weighted graph matching problems. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 10, 695--703.
17. Wang, C., & Scott, S. D. (2005). New kernels for protein structural notif discovery and function classification. International Conference on Machine Learning.

• Applied computing

  • Life and medical sciences

• Computing methodologies