skip to main content
10.1145/1255175.1255181acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

How to choose a digital preservation strategy: evaluating a preservation planning procedure

Published:18 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

An increasing number of institutions throughout the world face legal obligations or business needs to collect and preserve digital objects over several decades. A range of tools exists today to support the variety of preservation strategies such as migration or emulation. Yet, different preservation requirements across institutions and settings make the decision on which solution to implement very diffcult.

This paper presents the PLANETS Preservation Planning approach. It provides an approved way to make informed and accountable decisions on which solution to implement in order to optimally preserve digital objects for a given purpose. It is based on Utility Analysis to evaluate the performance of various solutions against well-defined requirements and goals. The viability of this approach is shown in a range of case studies for different settings. We present its application to two scenarios of web archives, two collections of electronic publications, and a collection of multimedia art. This work focuses on the different requirements and goals in the various preservation settings.

References

  1. Depocas, A. Digital preservation: Recording the Recoding. The Documentary Strategy. In Ars Electronica 2001: Takeover. Who's doing the Art of Tomorrow? (2001). http://www.aec.at/festival2001/texte/depocas_e.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ERPANET. The archiving and preservation of born-digital art workshop. Briefing Paper for the ERPANET workshop on Preservation of Digital Art, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Harvard University Library. Jhove - jstor/harvard object validation environment. Website, 2005. http://hul.harvard.edu/jhove.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoeven, J., Van Der Diessen, R., and Van En Meer, K. Development of a universal virtual computer (UVC) for long-term preservationof digital objects. Journal of Information Science Vol. 31 (3) (2005), 196--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hofman, H., Verdegem, R., Day, M., Rauber, A., Thaller, M., and Ross, S. DELOS deliverable 6.1: Framework for testbed for digital preservation experiments. Tech. rep., DELOS Network of Excellence, November 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hunter, J., and Choudhury, S. Implementing preservation strategies for complex multimedia objects. In The Seventh European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL'03) (Trondheim, August 17-22 2003), pp. 473--486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hunter, J., and Choudhury, S. A semi-automated digital preservation system based on semantic web services. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries(JCDL'04) (Tucson, Arizona, USA, June 7-11 2004), ACM, pp. 269--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hunter, J., and Choudhury, S. Panic: an integrated approach to the preservation of composite digital objects using semantic web services. International Journal on Digital Libraries 6, 2 (2006), 174--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. ISO. Space data and information transfer systems - Open archival information system - Reference model (ISO 14721:2003), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. ISO. Document management - Electronic document file format for long-term preservation - Part 1: Use of PDF 1.4 (PDF/A) ISO/CD 19005--1, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawrence, G. W., Kehoe, W. R., Rieger, O. Y., H. Walters, W., and Kenney, A. R. Risk Management of Digital Information: A File Format Investigation. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington D.C., USA, June 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mellor, P. Camileon: Emulation and BBC domesday. RLG DigiNews 7, 2 (April 2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. PADI: Preserving access to digital information, 2006. http://www.nla.gov.au/padi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pettitt, J. PRONOM - Field Descriptions. The National Archives, Digital Preservation Department, 2003. http://www.records.pro.gov.uk/~pronom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rauch, C., and Rauber, A. Preserving digital media: Towards a preservation solution evaluation metric. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries (ICADL'04) (Shanghai, P.R. China, December 13-17 2004), Springer, pp. 203--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Reichherzer, T., and Brown, G. Quantifying software requirements for supporting archived office documents using emulation. In Proceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Digital libraries (JCDL'06) (New York, NY, USA, June 11-15 2006), ACM Press, pp. 86--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rothenberg, J. Avoiding technological quicksand: Finding a viable technical foundation for digital preservation, January 1999. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/rothenberg/contents.html. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Smith, M. Eternal bits: How can we preserve digital files and save our collective memory? IEEE Spectrum 42, 7 (July 2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Strodl, S., Rauber, A., Hofman, H., Bogaarts, J., Verdegem, R., Kaiser, M., Bettelli, E. N., Neuroth, H., Strathmann, S., Debole, F., and Amato, G. DELOS deliverable 6.6: Delos digital preservation testbed for testing and evaluating digital preservation solutions. Tech. rep., DELOS Network of Excellence, July 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Strodl, S., Rauber, A., Rauch, C., Hofman, H., Franca Debole, and Amato, G. The DELOS testbed for choosing a digital preservation strategy. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries (ICADL'06) (Kyoto, Japan, November 27-30 2006), Springer, pp. 323--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tansley, R., Bass, M., Stuve, D., and Daniel Chudnov, M. B., McClellan, G., and Smith, M. Managing resources and services: The dspace institutional digital repository system: current functionality. In Proceedings of the 3rd Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL'03) (Houston, USA, May 27-31 2003), ACM, pp. 87--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. UNESCO. Guidelines for the preservation of digital heritage. UNESCO, Information Society Division, October 2003. http://www.unesco.org/webworld/mdm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How to choose a digital preservation strategy: evaluating a preservation planning procedure

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        JCDL '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
        June 2007
        534 pages
        ISBN:9781595936448
        DOI:10.1145/1255175

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 June 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader