skip to main content
10.1145/1240624.1240846acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Multiview: improving trust in group video conferencing through spatial faithfulness

Published:29 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Video conferencing is still considered a poor alternative to face-to-face meetings. In the business setting, where these systems are most prevalent, the misuse of video conferencing systems can have detrimental results, especially in high-stakes communications. Prior work suggests that spatial distortions of nonverbal cues, particularly gaze and deixis, negatively impact many aspects of effective communication in dyadic communications. However, video conferencing systems are often used for group-to-group meetings where spatial distortions are exacerbated. Meanwhile, its effects on the group dynamic are not well understood. In this study, we examine the effects that spatial distortions of nonverbal cues have on inter-group trust formation. We conducted a large (169 participant) study of group conferencing under various conditions. We found that the use of systems that introduce spatial distortions negatively affect trust formation patterns. On the other hand, these effects are essentially eliminated by using a spatially faithful video conferencing system.

References

  1. Axelrod, R. and Hamilton W.D. The evolution of cooperation. Science 221, 4489 (1981), 1390--1396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bendor, J. Uncertainty and the evolution of cooperation. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 37, 4 (1993), 709--734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., and Wright, Z. Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 135--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Butler, J.K., Jr. Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management 17, 3 (1991), 643--663.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Buxton, B. and Moran, T. EuroPARC's integrated interactive intermedia facility (IIIF): Early experiences. Proc. of IFIP WG8.4, ACM Press (1990), 11--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chen, M. Leveraging the asymmetric sensitivity of eye contact for videoconference. Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 49--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Drolet, A. and Morris, M. Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36, 1 (2000), 26--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hardin, R. Trust and Trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation Publications, New York, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nakazawa, K., Shiwa, S., Komatsu, T., and Ichinose, S. Proposal of a new eye contact method for teleconferences. IEICE Trans. on Communications E76-B, 6, (1993), 618--625.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nguyen, D. and Canny, J. MultiView: Spatially Faithful Group Video Conferencing. Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 512--521. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Okada, K., Maeda, F., Ichikawaa, Y., and Matsushita, Y. Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance: MAJIC design. Proc. CSCW 1994, ACM Press (1994), 385--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Olson, G. and Olson, J. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction 15 (2000), 139--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, A.M., and McCarthy, J.D. The researcher's dilemma: Evaluating trust in Computer-mediated communication. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58, 6 (2003), 759--781. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rocco, E. Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact, Proc. CHI 1998, ACM Press (1998), 496--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sellen, A., Buxton, B., and Arnott, J. Using spatial cues to improve videoconferencing. Proc. CHI 1992, ACM Press (1992), 651--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Vertegaal, R., Van der Veer, G. and Vons, H. Effects of gaze on multiparty mediated communication. Proc. Graphics Interface 2000, (2000), 95--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Vishwanath, D., Girshick, A.R., and Banks, M.S. Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place. Nature Neuroscience 8, 10 (2005), 1401--1410.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multiview: improving trust in group video conferencing through spatial faithfulness

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2007
          1654 pages
          ISBN:9781595935939
          DOI:10.1145/1240624

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 April 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate182of840submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader