Jeffrey T. Hancock
ABSTRACT
Online dating is a popular new tool for initiating romantic relationships, although recent research and media reports suggest that it may also be fertile ground for deception. Unlike previous studies that rely solely on self-report data, the present study establishes ground truth for 80 online daters' height, weight and age, and compares ground truth data to the information provided in online dating profiles. The results suggest that deception is indeed frequently observed, but that the magnitude of the deceptions is usually small. As expected, deceptions differ by gender. Results are discussed in light of the Hyperpersonal model and the self-presentational tensions experienced by online dating participants.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Slides from the presentation
Supplemental material for 'The truth about lying in online dating profiles'
- Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, article 2. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Fiore, A. T., & Donath, J. (2004). Online Personals: An Overview. Proc, CHI (2004), 1395--1398. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
- Hancock, J., Thom-Santelli, J., & Ritchie, T. (2004). Deception and design: The impact of communication technology on lying behavior. Proc, CHI (2004), 129--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lance, L. (1998). Gender differences in heterosexual dating: A content analysis of personal ads. Journal of Men's Studies, 6, 297--305.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3--44.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The truth about lying in online dating profiles
Recommendations
Reading between the lines: linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles
CSCW '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative workThis study investigates whether deception in online dating profiles is detectable through a linguistic approach, which assumes that liars nonconsciously produce different word patterns than truth-tellers. We objectively measure deception in online ...
Everyday deception or a few prolific liars? The prevalence of lies in text messaging
Most people tell lies over text messaging, and a minority of those people do so frequently.The goals of text messaging impact the properties of deceptive text messages relative to face-to-face lies.There is some indication that deception occurs less ...
The attractiveness, trustworthiness and desirability of autistic males’ online dating profiles
AbstractA lack of success through traditional, face-to-face dating has led some autistic adults to pursue relationships through online dating. Creating an online dating profile, however, is a process that requires a range of complex social ...
Highlights- Two studies of autistic males’ online dating profiles led us to develop 3 key tips for autistic online daters.
Comments