A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network

ABSTRACT

Using data from a popular online social network site, this paper explores the relationship between profile structure (namely, which fields are completed) and number of friends, giving designers insight into the importance of the profile and how it works to encourage connections and articulated relationships between users. We describe a theoretical framework that draws on aspects of signaling theory, common ground theory, and transaction costs theory to generate an understanding of why certain profile fields may be more predictive of friendship articulation on the site. Using a dataset consisting of 30,773 Facebook profiles, we determine which profile elements are most likely to predict friendship links and discuss the theoretical and design implications of our findings.

References

1. Bakos, J. (1999) Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces. Management Science, 43 (12). 1676--1692.
2. Berger, C.R. Planning and scheming: Strategies for initiating relationships. in Burnett, R., McGhee, P. and Clark, D. eds. Accounting for relationships: Explanation, representaion and knowledge, Methuen, New York, 1987, 158--174.
3. boyd, d. (2006) Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11 (12).
4. Clark, H.H. Arenas of Language Use. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1992.
5. Clark, H.H. and Brennan, S.E. Grounding in communication. in Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M. and Teasley, S.D. eds. Perspectives on socially shared cognition, APA Press, Washington, 1991.
6. Culnan, M.J. and Markus, M.L. Information technologies. in Jablin, F.M., Putnam, L.L., Roberts, K.H. and Porter, L.W. eds. Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1987, 420--443.
7. DePaulo, B., Kashy, D., Kirkendol, S., Wyer, M. and Epstein, J. (1996) Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (5). 979--995.
8. Donath, J.S. Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community. in Kollock, P. and Smith, M. eds. Communities in Cyberspace, Routledge, London, 1998.
9. Donath, J.S. Signals, Truth and Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, forthcoming.
10. Donath, J.S. and boyd, d. (2004) Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22 (4). 71.
11. Ellison, N., Heino, R. and Gibbs, J. (2006) Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2).
12. Ellison, N., Lampe, C. and Steinfield, C., Spatially Bounded Online Social Networks and Social Capital: The Role of Facebook. in International Communication Association, (Dresden, 2006).
13. Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York, NY, 1959.
14. Gross, R. and Acquisti, A., Information Revelation and Privacy in Online Social Networks. in Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, (Alexandria, VA, 2005), ACM Press.
15. Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C., A Face(book) in the Crowd: Social Searching vs. Social Browsing. in ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, (Banff, Canada, 2006), ACM Press.
16. Olson, G.M. and Olson, J.S. Distance matters. in Carroll, J. ed. HCI in the New Millennium, Addison-Weasley, New York, 2001.
17. Preece, J. and Maloney-Krichmar. Online Communities. in Jacko, J. and Sears, A. eds. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 2003, 596--620.
18. Reid, E. Hierarchy and power: Social control in cyberspace. in Smith, M.A. and Kollock, P. eds. Communities in Cyberspace, Routledge, London, 1999, 107--133.
19. Resnick, P. Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital. in Carroll, J. ed. HCI in the New Millenium, Addison-Wesley, 2001.
20. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.
21. Stutzman, F., An Evaluation of Identity-Sharing Behavior in Social Network Communities. in iDMAa and IMS Code Conference, (Oxford, OH, 2005).
22. Sunnafrank, M. (1986) Predicted outcome value during initial interactions: A reformulation of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 13. 3--33.
23. Sunnafrank, M. and Ramirez, A. (2004) At first sight: Persistant relational effects of get-acquainted conversations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21 (3). 361--379.
24. Tidwell, L.C. and Walther, J.B. (2002) Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28 (317--348).
25. Utz, S. (2000) Social Information Processing in MUDs:The Development of Friendships in Virtual Worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1 (1).
26. Walther, J.B. (1996) Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interactions. Communication Research, 23. 1--43.
27. Walther, J.B. (1993) Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57. 381--398.
28. Walther, J.B. (1992) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19. 52--90.
29. Walther, J.B., Anderson, J.F. and Park, D.W. (1994) Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction. Communication Research, 21 (4). 460--487.
30. Walther, J.B. and Parks, M.R. Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. in Knapp, M.L. and Daly, J.A. eds. Handbook of interpersonal communication, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002, 529--563.
31. Wellman, B. (2001) Computer Networks as Social Networks. Science, 293 (14). 2031--2034.
32. Williamson, O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. The Free Press, New York, 1985.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Web-based interaction