skip to main content
10.1145/1233341.1233418acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Techniques for improving the visibility and "sharability" of semi-transparent video in shared workspaces

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 March 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Semi-transparency increases the amount of information that interfaces can expose in a given screen space by allowing content from a window to remain partially visible while other windows overlap it. We have previously explored the application of a full screen, semi-transparent video window in a collaborative, distributed software environment in an effort to more seamlessly incorporate face-to-face communication into group software development. Our experience with the system suggests that, while semi-transparent video can improve aspects of distributed collaborations, two problems emerge. First, the alpha blending of pixels from video overlays can obfuscate certain types of visual data, making either the video or the underlying content diffcult to see. Second, video overlays complicate the ability to provide application sharing at the framebuffer - the most general sharing layer. In this paper, we present methods to overcome these problems.

References

  1. P. Baheti, E. Gehringer, and D. Stotts. Exploring the effcacy of distributed pair programming. In XP Universe 2003, volume 2418, pages 208--220, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Baudisch and C. Gutwin. Multiblending: displaying overlapping windows simultaneously without the drawbacks of alpha blending. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 367--374. ACM Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. W. e. a. D. Stotts. Virtual teaming: Experiments and experiences with distributed pair programming. pages 129--141, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. Ishii and M. Kobayashi. Clearboard: a seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 525--532. ACM Press, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. O. Morikawa and T. Maesako. Hypermirror: toward pleasant-to-use video mediated communication system. In CSCW '98: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 149--158, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K.-I. Okada, F. Maeda, Y. Ichikawaa, and Y. Matsushita. Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance: Majic design. In CSCW '94: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 385--393, New York, NY, USA, 1994. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. J. Sellen. Speech patterns in video-mediated conversations. In CHI '92: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 49--59, New York, NY, USA, 1992. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Stotts, J. Smith, and K. Gyllstrom. Support for distributed pair programming in the transparent video facetop. In XP/Agile Universe 2004, pages 92--104, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Stotts, J. M. Smith, and K. Gyllstrom. Facespace: endo- and exo-spatial hypermedia in the transparent video facetop. In Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Hypertext & hypermedia, pages 48--57. ACM Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. S. Tan, B. Meyers, and M. Czerwinski. Wincuts: manipulating arbitrary window regions for more effective use of screen space. In CHI '04: CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1525--1528, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Tang, C. Neustaedter, and S. Greenberg. Videoarms: Supporting remote embodiment in groupware. video. In Video Proceedings of the ACM CSCW Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. C. Tang and S. Minneman. Videowhiteboard: video shadows to support remote collaboration. In CHI '91: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 315--322, New York, NY, USA, 1991. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. C. Tang and S. L. Minneman. Videodraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 9(2):170--184, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Techniques for improving the visibility and "sharability" of semi-transparent video in shared workspaces

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ACM-SE 45: Proceedings of the 45th annual southeast regional conference
          March 2007
          574 pages
          ISBN:9781595936295
          DOI:10.1145/1233341

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 23 March 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate178of377submissions,47%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader