Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork efficiency, fluency, and perception of team

ABSTRACT

A crucial skill for fluent action meshing in human team activity is a learned and calculated selection of anticipatory actions. We believe that the same holds for robotic teammates, if they are to perform in a similarly fluent manner with their human counterparts.In this work, we propose an adaptive action selection mechanism for a robotic teammate, making anticipatory decisions based on the confidence of their validity and their relative risk. We predict an improvement in task efficiency and fluency compared to a purely reactive process.We then present results from a study involving untrained human subjects working with a simulated version of a robot using our system. We show a significant improvement in best-case task efficiency when compared to a group of users working with a reactive agent, as well as a significant difference in the perceived commitment of the robot to the team and its contribution to the team's uency and success. By way of explanation, we propose a number of fluency metrics that differ significantly between the two study groups.

References

1. R. Alami, A. Clodic, V. Montreuil, E. A. Sisbot, and R. Chatila. Task planning for human-robot interaction. In sOc-EUSAI '05: Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence, pages 81--85, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
2. J. F. Allen. The TRAINS project: A case study in building a conversational planning agent. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical AI (JETAI), 7:7--48, 1995.
3. M. Bratman. Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, 101(2):327--341, 1992.
4. C. Breazeal, C. D. Kidd, A. L. Thomaz, G. Hoffman, and M. Berlin. Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, August 2005.
5. D. J. Bruemmer, D. D. Dudenhoeffer, and J. Marble. Dynamic autonomy for urban search and rescue. In 2002 AAAI Mobile Robot Workshop, Edmonton, Canada, August 2002.
6. Y. Endo. Anticipatory and improvisational robot via recollection and exploitation of episodic memories. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium, 2005.
7. T. W. Fong, C. Thorpe, and C. Baur. Multi-robot remote driving with collaborative control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2003.
8. M. Goodrich, D. Olsen, J. Crandall, and T. Palmer. Experiments in adjustable autonomy. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Autonomy, Delegation and Control: Interacting with Intelligent Agents, 2001.
9. B. J. Grosz. Collaborative systems. AI Magazine, 17(2):67--85, 1996.
10. B. J. Grosz and C. L. Sidner. Plans for discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack, editors, Intentions in communication, chapter 20, pages 417--444. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
11. G. Hoffman and C. Breazeal. Collaboration in human-robot teams. In Proc. of the AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, September 2004. AIAA.
12. H. Jones and S. Rock. Dialogue-based human-robot interaction for space construction teams. In IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, volume 7, pages 3645--3653, 2002.
13. H. Kimura, T. Horiuchi, and K. Ikeuchi. Task-model based human robot cooperation using vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'99), pages 701--706, 1999.
14. G. Knoblich and J. S. Jordan. Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5):1006--1016, September 2003.
15. R. Kohavi, B. Becker, and D. Sommerfield. Improving simple bayes. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, 1997.
16. T. Komatsu and Y. Miyake. Temporal development of dual timing mechanism in synchronization tapping task. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (RO-MAN 2004), September 2004.
17. L. Lambert and S. Carberry. A tripartite plan-based model of dialogue. In Proceedings of the 29th conference on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 47--54. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1991.
18. H. J. Levesque, P. R. Cohen, and J. H. T. Nunes. On acting together. In Proceedings of AAAI-90, pages 94--99, Boston, MA, 1990.
19. C. Rich, C. L. Sidner, and N. Lesh. Collagen: Applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer collaboration. AI Magazine, 22(4):15--25, 2001.
20. N. Sebanz, H. Bekkering, and G. Knoblich. Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2):70--76, 2006.
21. C. Sidner, C. Lee, and N. Lesh. Engagement rules for human-robot collaborative interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, volume 4, pages 3957--3962, 2003.
22. M. Wilson and G. Knoblich. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131:460--473, 2005.
23. H. Woern and T. Laengle. Cooperation between human beings and robot systems in an industrial environment. In Proceedings of the Mechatronics and Robotics, volume 1, pages 156--165, 2000.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Artificial intelligence

    • Philosophical/theoretical foundations of artificial intelligence