skip to main content
article

A logic for reasoning about the probability of fuzzy events

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 March 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this paper we present the logic FP(L"n,L) which allows to reason about the probability of fuzzy events formalized by means of the notion of state in a MV-algebra. This logic is defined starting from a basic idea exposed by Hajek [Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998]. Two kinds of semantics have been introduced, namely the class of weak and strong probabilistic models. The main result of this paper is a completeness theorem for the logic FP(L"n,L) w.r.t. both weak and strong models. We also present two extensions of FP(L"n,L): the first one is the logic FP(L"n,RPL), obtained by expanding the FP(L"n,L)-language with truth-constants for the rationals in [0,1], while the second extension is the logic FCP(L"n,L@P12) allowing to reason about conditional states.

References

  1. [2] Cignoli, R., D'Ottaviano, I.M.L. and Mundici, D., Algebraic a Foundations of Many-Valued Reasoning. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [3] Cintula, P., The ŁΠ and ŁΠ12 propositional and predicate logics. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. v124. 21-34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [4] Cintula, P., Advances in the ŁΠ and ŁΠ12 logics. Arch. Math. Logic. v42. 449-468.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [5] A. Di Nola, G. Georgescu, A. Lettieri, Conditional states in finite-valued logic, in: E.P. Klement, D. Dubois, H. Prade (Eds.), Fuzzy Sets, Logics, and Reasoning About Knowledge, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999, pp. 161--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [6] Esteva, F., Godo, L. and Hájek, P., Reasoning about probability using fuzzy logic. Neural Network World. v10 i5. 811-824.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [7] Esteva, F., Godo, L. and Montagna, F., ŁΠ and ŁΠ12: two complete fuzzy systems joining Łukasiewiczand Product logics. Arch. Math. Logic. v40. 39-67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [8] T. Flaminio, A Zero-Layer Based Fuzzy Probabilistic Logic for Conditional Probability. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 3571, Springer, Berlin, in: Lluís Godo (Ed.), Eighth European Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitaive Approaches on Reasoning under Uncertainty ECSQARU'05, Barcelona, Spain, July 2005, pp. 714--725. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [9] T. Flaminio, NP-containment for the coherence tests of assessment of conditional probability: a fuzzy-logical approach, Arch. Math. Logic, accepted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [10] Flaminio, T. and Montagna, F., A logical and algebraic treatment of conditional probability. Arch. Math. Logic. v44. 245-262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [11] B. Gerla, Many-valued logics of continuous t-norms and their functional representation, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Milan, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [12] R. Grigolia, Algebraic analysis of Łukasiewicz-Tarski n-valued logical systems, in: R. Wójcicki, G. Malinowski (Eds.), Selected Papers on ŁukasiewiczSentencial Calculi, Wrocław, Polish Academy of Science, Ossolineum, 1977, pp. 81--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [13] Hájek, P., Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [14] P. Hájek, L. Godo, F. Esteva, Probability and fuzzy logic, in: P. Besnard, S. Hanks (Eds.), Proc. of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence UAI'95, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1995, pp. 237--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [15] Kroupa, T., Conditional probability on MV-algebras. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. v149 i2. 369-381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [16] T. Kroupa, States and conditional probability on MV-algebras, Ph.D. Thesis, ČVUT FEL, Praha, 2005, 74pp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [17] Kroupa, T., Representation and extension of states on MV-algebras. Arch. Math. Logic. v45. 381-392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [18] E. Marchioni, L. Godo, A logic for reasoning about coherent conditional probability: a fuzzy modal logic approach, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 3229, Springer, Berlin, in: J.J. Alferes, J. Leite (Eds.), Ninth European Conf. on Logic in Artificial Intelligence JELIA'04. Lisbon, Portugal, September 2004, pp. 213--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [19] Montagna, F., An algebraic approach to propositional fuzzy logic. J. Logic Language Inform. v9. 91-124. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [20] Mundici, D., Averaging the truth-value in Łukasiewiczlogic. Studia Logica. v55 i1. 113-127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [21] D. Mundici, B. Riečan, Probability on MV-algebras, in: E. Pap (Ed.), Handbook of Measure Theory, Vol. II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002, pp. 869--909.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [22] J.B. Paris, A note on the Dutch Book method, Revised version of a paper of the same title which appeared in The Proceedings of the Second Internat. Symp. on Imprecise Probabilities and their Applications, ISIPTA'01, Ithaca, New York, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [23] Zadeh, L.A., Probability measures of fuzzy events. J. Math. Anal. Appl. v23. 421-427.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A logic for reasoning about the probability of fuzzy events

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access