skip to main content
10.3115/1220575.1220618dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Extracting product features and opinions from reviews

Published:06 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Consumers are often forced to wade through many on-line reviews in order to make an informed product choice. This paper introduces Opine, an unsupervised information-extraction system which mines reviews in order to build a model of important product features, their evaluation by reviewers, and their relative quality across products.Compared to previous work, Opine achieves 22% higher precision (with only 3% lower recall) on the feature extraction task. Opine's novel use of relaxation labeling for finding the semantic orientation of words in context leads to strong performance on the tasks of finding opinion phrases and their polarity.

References

  1. A. Almuhareb and M. Poesio. 2004. Attribute-based and value-based clustering: An evaluation. In EMNLP, pages 158--165.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Berland and E. Charniak. 1999. Finding parts in very large corpora. In ACL, pages 57--64.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. O. Etzioni, M. Cafarella, D. Downey, S. Kok, A. Popescu, T. Shaked, S. Soderland, D. Weld, and A. Yates. 2005. Unsupervised named-entity extraction from the web: An experimental study. Artificial Intelligence, 165(1):91--134.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. V. Hatzivassiloglou and K. McKeown. 1997. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In ACL/EACL, pages 174--181.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Hu and B. Liu. 2004. Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews. In KDD, pages 168--177, Seattle, WA.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. A. Hummel and S. W. Zucker. 1983. On the foundations of relaxation labeling processes. In PAMI, pages 267--287.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Kim and E. Hovy. 2004. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In COLING.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N. Kobayashi, K. Inui, K. Tateishi, and T. Fukushima. 2004. Collecting Evaluative Expressions for Opinion Extraction. In IJCNLP, pages 596--605.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Kushal, S. Lawrence, and D. Pennock. 2003. Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In WWW.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Lin. 1998. Dependency-based evaluation of MINIPAR. In Workshop on Evaluation of Parsing Systems at ICLRE.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Morinaga, K. Yamanishi, K. Tateishi, and T. Fukushima. 2002. Mining product reputations on the web. In KDD.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lee L. Pang, B and S. Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up? sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In EMNLP, pages 79--86.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Popescu, A. Yates, and O. Etzioni. 2004. Class extraction from the World Wide Web. In AAAI-04 Workshop on Adaptive Text Extraction and Mining, pages 68--73.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Rangarajan. 2000. Self annealing and self annihilation: unifying deterministic annealing and relaxation labeling. In Pattern Recognition, 33:635--649.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. E. Riloff, J. Wiebe, and T. Wilson. 2003. Learning Subjective Nouns Using Extraction Pattern Bootstrapping. In CoNLL, pages 25--32s.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. H. Takamura, T. Inui, and M. Okumura. 2005. Extracting Semantic Orientations of Words using Spin Model. In ACL, pages 133--141.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. P. D. Turney. 2001. Mining the Web for Synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. In Procs. of the Twelfth European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML-2001), pages 491--502, Freiburg, Germany.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. D. Turney. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Procs. of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02), pages 417--424.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. P. Turney. 2003. Inference of Semantic Orientation from Association. In CoRR cs. CL/0309034.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Wiebe. 2000. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. In AAAI/IAAI, pages 735--740.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image DL Hosted proceedings
        HLT '05: Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
        October 2005
        1054 pages

        Publisher

        Association for Computational Linguistics

        United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 October 2005

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        HLT '05 Paper Acceptance Rate127of402submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate240of768submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader