skip to main content
10.3115/1220355.1220538dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescolingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Combining clues for lexical level aligning using the null hypothesis approach

Published:23 August 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Various informations can be used to align parallel texts at word level: co-occurrence frequencies, position difference, part-of-speech, graphic resemblance, etc. This paper proposes a simple method to combine these clues in an efficient way. The association score is computed from the probabilities of pairing two units under Null hypothesis, assuming that the association is fortuitous. This approach has been applied to a literary English-French parallel text with good results.

References

  1. L. Ahrenberg, M. Merkel, A. S. Hein and J. Tiedemann 2000. Evaluation of word alignment systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC-2000. European Language Resources Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. D. Brown, J. G. Carbonell, Y. Yimin 2000. Automatic dictionary extraction for cross-language information retrieval. In Parallel Text Processing, J. Véronis, ed., 275--297. Dordrecht, Nederlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ido Dagan, K. W. Church and W. Gale. 1993 Robust Bilingual Word Alignment for Machine Aided Translation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Academic and Industrial Perspectives, pp. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ted Dunning 1993. Accurate Methods for the Statistics of surprise and Coincidence. Computational Linguistics. Vol 19, 1, pp. 61--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Huang Jin-Xia and Choi Key-Sun 2000. Chinese-Korean Word Alignment Based on Linguistic Comparison. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-2000, pp.392--399 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gabriel Lopes and João Mexia 2001. Cognates alignment. In Proceedings of MT Summit VIII.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dan Melamed 1998. Automatic evaluation and uniform filter cascades for inducing n-best translation lexicons. In Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora (WVLC3), Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Nerbonne 2000. Parallel texts in computer-assisted language learning, In Parallel Text Processing, J. Véronis, ed., pages 299--311. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hwee Tou Ng, Wang Bin and Chan Yee Seng 2003. Exploiting Parallel Texts for Word Sense Disambiguation: In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jörg Tiedemann 2003. Combining Clues for Word Alignment. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL03), Budapest, Hungary, April 12--17, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dan Tufis. 2002. A cheap and fast way to build useful translation lexicons. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING-2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Véronis and P. Langlais. 2000. Evaluation of parallel text alignment systems - The ARCADE project. In Parallel Text Processing, J. Véronis, ed., 49--68. Dordrecht, Nederlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    COLING '04: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics
    August 2004
    1411 pages

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 August 2004

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    COLING '04 Paper Acceptance Rate1,411of1,411submissions,100%Overall Acceptance Rate1,537of1,537submissions,100%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader