ABSTRACT
This paper presents a successful application of simulation-based multi-objective optimization of a complex real-world scheduling problem. Concepts of the implemented simulation-based optimization architecture are described, as well as how different components of the architecture are implemented. Multiple objectives are handled in the optimization process by considering the decision makers' preferences using both prior and posterior articulations. The efficiency of the optimization process is enhanced by performing culling of solutions before using the simulation model, avoiding unpromising solutions to be unnecessarily processed by the computationally expensive simulation.
- Allaoui, H., and A. Artiba. 2004. Integrating simulation and optimization to schedule a hybrid flow shop with maintenance constraints. Computers & Industrial Engineering 47: 431--450. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Almeida, M. R., S. Hamacher, M. A. C. Pacheco, and M. B. R. Velasco. 2001. Applying Genetic Algorithms to the Production Scheduling of a Petroleum Refinery. In MIC'2001 - 4th Metaheuristics International Conference, 773--777.Google Scholar
- Arnaout, J-P. M., and G. Rabadi. 2005. Minimizing the Total Weighted Completion Time on Unrelated Parallel Machines with Stochastic Times. In Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Azzaro-Pantel, C., L. Bernal-Haro, P. Baudet, S. Domenech, and L. Pibouleau. 1998. A two-stage methodology for short-term batch plant scheduling: discrete-event simulation and genetic algorithm. Journal of Computers and Chemical Engineering 22(10): 1461--1481.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baesler, F. F., and J. A. Sepúlveda. 2001. Multi-Objective Simulation Optimization for a Cancer Treatment Center. In Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cormen, T. H., C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein. 2001. Introduction to Algorithms. 2nd edition. USA: MIT Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deb, K. 2001. Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eskandari, H., L. Rabelo, and M. Mollaghasemi. 2005. Multiobjective Simulation Optimization Using an Enhanced Genetic Algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evan, G., Stuckman, M. and Mollaghasemi, M. 1991. Multiple response simulation optimization. In Proceedings of the 1991 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
- Gupta, A. K., and A. I. Sivakumar. 2002. Simulation based Multiobjective Schedule Optimization in Semiconductor Manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Medaglia, A. L., S. B. Graves, and J. L. Ringuest. 2004. Multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty. Technical Report No. COPA 2004--003, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Los Andes, Colombia.Google Scholar
- Persson, A., H. Grimm, and A. Ng. 2006. On-line Instrumentation in Simulation-based Optimization. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2006. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Srinivas, N., and K. Deb. 1995. Multiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms. Evolutionary Computation 2(3): 221--248. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weigert, G., S. Werner, D. Hampel, H. Heinrich and W. Sauer. 2000. Multi Objective Decision Making - Solutions for the Optimization of Manufacturing Processes. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing (FAIM2000), 487--496.Google Scholar
- Simulation-based multi-objective optimization of a real-world scheduling problem
Recommendations
An r-dominance-based preference multi-objective optimization for many-objective optimization
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms have been used in finding a representative set of Pareto-optimal solutions in the past decade and beyond. However, most of Pareto domination-based multi-objective optimization evolutionary ...
Effects of Objective Space Normalization in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms on Real-World Problems
GECCO '23: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation ConferenceIn real-world multi-objective problems, each objective has a totally different scale. However, some frequently-used multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have no objective space normalization mechanisms. The effect of objective space ...
Multi-objective optimization using teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm
Two major goals in multi-objective optimization are to obtain a set of nondominated solutions as closely as possible to the true Pareto front (PF) and maintain a well-distributed solution set along the Pareto front. In this paper, we propose a teaching-...
Comments