Talk amongst yourselves: inviting users to participate in online conversations

ABSTRACT

Many small online communities would benefit from increased diversity or activity in their membership. Some communities run the risk of dying out due to lack of participation. Others struggle to achieve the critical mass necessary for diverse and engaging conversation. But what tools are available to these communities to increase participation? Our goal in this research was to spark contributions to the movielens.org discussion forum, where only 2% of the members write posts. We developed personalized invitations, messages designed to entice users to visit or contribute to the forum. In two field experiments, we ask (1) if personalized invitations increase activity in a discussion forum, (2) how the choice of algorithm for intelligently choosing content to emphasize in the invitation affects participation, and (3) how the suggestion made to the user affects their willingness to act. We find that invitations lead to increased participation, as measured by levels of reading and posting. More surprisingly, we find that invitations emphasizing the social nature of the discussion forum increase user activity, while invitations emphasizing other details of the discussion are less successful.

References

1. Bewley, W., Roberts, T., Schroit, D., and Verplank, W. Human factors testing in the design of Xerox's 8010 "Star" office workstation. CHI 1983.
2. Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S. Statistics for Experimenter: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.
3. Bryk, A. S., and Raudenbush. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage, CA, 1992.
4. Butler, B. When is a group not a group: An empirical examination of metaphors for online social structure. Social and Decision Sciences, 1999.
5. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., and Eagly, A. H. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In Uleman, J. S. and Bargh, J. A. (Eds.), Unintended Thought. Guilford Press, 1989.
6. Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., and Riedl, J. Using intelligent task routing and contribution review to help communities build artifacts of lasting value. CHI 2006.
7. Drenner, S., Harper, M., Frankowski, D., Riedl, J., and Terveen, L. Insert Movie Reference Here: A System to Bridge Conversation and Item-Oriented Web Sites. CHI Notes, CHI 2006.
8. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 1954.
9. Greenspan, R. Surfers Prefer Personalization. http://www.webcitation.org/5IsMR19Gt. 2004.
10. Hill, W., Stead, L., Rosenstein, M., and Furnas, G. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. CHI 1995.
11. Lampe, C. and Johnston, E. Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community. Group 2005.
12. Loewenstein, G. The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 1994.
13. Ludford, P.J., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., and Terveen, L. Think Different: Increasing Online Community Participation Using Uniqueness and Group Dissimilarity. CHI 2004.
14. McDonald, D. Internal and external evidence in the identification and semantic categorization of proper names. In Corpus Processing For Lexical Acquisition, 1996.
15. Nonnecke, B. and Preece, J. Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. CHI 2000.
16. Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., and Andrews, D. The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 2004.
17. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., and Riedl, J. GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. CSCW 1994.
18. Ridings, C. M., and Gefen, D. Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(1), 2004.
19. Schafer, J., Konstan, J., Riedl, J. E-Commerce Recommendation Applications. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2001.
20. Simon, H. Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In Greenberger, M. (Ed.) Computers, communications and the public interest. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD, 1971.
21. Webster A. S., Vassileva J. Visualizing Personal Relations in Online Communities. Workshop on Social Navigation and Community Based Adaptation Technologies, Adaptive Hypermedia 2006.
22. Zajonc, R. B. Attitudinal effect of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, Monograph Supplement, 1968.
23. Zipf, G.K. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA, 1949.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Law, social and behavioral sciences

    • Psychology

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Web-based interaction

• Information systems

  • World Wide Web

    • Web applications

      • Internet communications tools