skip to main content
article

Rank-maximal matchings

Published:01 October 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Suppose that each member of a set A of applicants ranks a subset of a set P of posts in an order of preference, possibly involving ties. A matching is a set of (applicant, post) pairs such that each applicant and each post appears in at most one pair. A rank-maximal matching is one in which the maximum possible number of applicants are matched to their first choice post, and subject to that condition, the maximum possible number are matched to their second choice post, and so on. This is a relevant concept in any practical matching situation and it was first studied by Irving [2003].We give an algorithm to compute a rank-maximal matching with running time O(min(n + C,Cn)m), where C is the maximal rank of an edge used in a rank-maximal matching, n is the number of applicants and posts and m is the total size of the preference lists.

References

  1. Gabow, H. N., and Tarjan, R. E. 1989. Faster scaling algorithms for network problems. SIAM J. Comput., 18, 1013--1036.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gale, D., and Shapley, L. S. 1962. College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly, 69, 9--15.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gusfield, D., and Irving, R. W. 1989. The Stable Marriage Problem: Structure and Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Halldórsson, M. M., Iwama, K., Miyasaki, S., and Yanagisawa, H. 2003. Improved approximation of the stable marriage problem. In Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Algorithms 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2832, Springer-Verlag, New York, 266--277.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hopcroft, J. E., and Karp, R. M. 1973. An n5/2 algorithm for maximum matching in bipartite graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 2, 225--231.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Irving, R. W. 1998. Matching medical students to pairs of hospitals: A new variation on a well-known theme. In Proceedings of the 6th European Symposium on Algorithms 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1461. Springer-Verlag, New York, 381--392.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Irving, R. W. 2003. Greedy matchings. Tech. Rep. TR-2003-136. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, Apr.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Irving, R. W., Manlove, D. F., and Scott, S. 2003. Strong stability in the hospitals-residents problem. In Proceedings of the 20th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2607. Springer-Verlag, New York. 439--450.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mehlhorn, K., and Michail, D. Network problems with non-polynomial weights and applications. www.mpi-sb.mpg.de/~mehlhorn/ftp/HugeWeights.ps]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Pulleyblank, W. R. 1995. Matchings and extensions, In The Handbook of Combinatorics, R. L., Graham, M., Grötschel, and L., Lovász, Eds. North Holland, Amsterdan, The Netherland, 179--232.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Roth, A. E. 1984. The evaluation of the labor market for medical interns and residents: a case study in game theory. J. Polit. Econ. 92, 6, 991--1016.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Rank-maximal matchings

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Algorithms
      ACM Transactions on Algorithms  Volume 2, Issue 4
      October 2006
      233 pages
      ISSN:1549-6325
      EISSN:1549-6333
      DOI:10.1145/1198513
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2006
      Published in talg Volume 2, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader