Abstract
Suppose that each member of a set A of applicants ranks a subset of a set P of posts in an order of preference, possibly involving ties. A matching is a set of (applicant, post) pairs such that each applicant and each post appears in at most one pair. A rank-maximal matching is one in which the maximum possible number of applicants are matched to their first choice post, and subject to that condition, the maximum possible number are matched to their second choice post, and so on. This is a relevant concept in any practical matching situation and it was first studied by Irving [2003].We give an algorithm to compute a rank-maximal matching with running time O(min(n + C,C √n)m), where C is the maximal rank of an edge used in a rank-maximal matching, n is the number of applicants and posts and m is the total size of the preference lists.
- Gabow, H. N., and Tarjan, R. E. 1989. Faster scaling algorithms for network problems. SIAM J. Comput., 18, 1013--1036.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gale, D., and Shapley, L. S. 1962. College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly, 69, 9--15.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gusfield, D., and Irving, R. W. 1989. The Stable Marriage Problem: Structure and Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Halldórsson, M. M., Iwama, K., Miyasaki, S., and Yanagisawa, H. 2003. Improved approximation of the stable marriage problem. In Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Algorithms 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2832, Springer-Verlag, New York, 266--277.]]Google Scholar
- Hopcroft, J. E., and Karp, R. M. 1973. An n5/2 algorithm for maximum matching in bipartite graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 2, 225--231.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Irving, R. W. 1998. Matching medical students to pairs of hospitals: A new variation on a well-known theme. In Proceedings of the 6th European Symposium on Algorithms 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1461. Springer-Verlag, New York, 381--392.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Irving, R. W. 2003. Greedy matchings. Tech. Rep. TR-2003-136. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, Apr.]]Google Scholar
- Irving, R. W., Manlove, D. F., and Scott, S. 2003. Strong stability in the hospitals-residents problem. In Proceedings of the 20th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2607. Springer-Verlag, New York. 439--450.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mehlhorn, K., and Michail, D. Network problems with non-polynomial weights and applications. www.mpi-sb.mpg.de/~mehlhorn/ftp/HugeWeights.ps]]Google Scholar
- Pulleyblank, W. R. 1995. Matchings and extensions, In The Handbook of Combinatorics, R. L., Graham, M., Grötschel, and L., Lovász, Eds. North Holland, Amsterdan, The Netherland, 179--232.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roth, A. E. 1984. The evaluation of the labor market for medical interns and residents: a case study in game theory. J. Polit. Econ. 92, 6, 991--1016.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Rank-maximal matchings
Recommendations
Popular matchings: structure and algorithms
An instance of the popular matching problem (POP-M) consists of a set of applicants and a set of posts. Each applicant has a preference list that strictly ranks a subset of the posts. A matching M of applicants to posts is popular if there is no ...
Rank-maximal matchings – structure and algorithms
AbstractLet G = ( A ∪ P , E ) be a bipartite graph where A denotes a set of applicants, P denotes a set of posts and ranks on the edges denote preferences of the agents over posts. A matching M in G is rank-maximal if it matches the maximum ...
Dynamic rank-maximal and popular matchings
We consider the problem of matching applicants to posts where applicants have preferences over posts. Thus the input to our problem is a bipartite graph $$G=(\mathcal {A}\cup \mathcal {P},E)$$G=(AýP,E), where $$\mathcal {A}$$A denotes a set of ...
Comments