Louis-Claude Paquin
- BARTHET, M.F.(1987) Ergonomie du logiciel, Paris, Dunod.Google Scholar
- KOWALSKI, R.; SERGOT, M. (1989) "The use of logical models in legal problem solving," in Proceedings of the International Conference on Law and Artificial Intelligence:Expert Systems in Law, Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
- MYLOPOULOS, J. BRODIE, M., "Knowledge Bases and Databases: Current Trends and Future Directions". Conference given at CRIM, Montreal, 1990, pp.28.Google Scholar
- OSKAMP A., WALKER R.F.,SCHRICKX J.A., BERG van den P.H., "Prolexs, divide and rule: a legal application" in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM Preas, 1989, pp.54-62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- PAQUIN, L.-C. (1987) "DEREDEC-EXPERT, outil d'ingenierie cognitive", contribution au International Congress on Terminilogy and Knowledge Engineering, Trier (RFA).Google Scholar
- RIALLE, V. (1988), "Ergonomie cognitive et bases de connaissances", in: Le Journal de l'InteUigence ArtificieUe, n~ 9,pp. 4-9.Google Scholar
- RIBORDY, F., LAFLAMME, S., CAZEBON, B., (1986-1987),"Les textes de lois sont-ils lisibles et comprehcnsibles?" in Revuede l'lnstitut de sociologie, vol.2, n~l, pp. 223-244.Google Scholar
- TERSSAC, G. de, SOUBIE, J.-L., NEVEU, J.-P., (1988),"Technologie et organisation: les savoirs menaces?", in Sociologie du Travail, n~3, pp. 462-477.Google Scholar
- THOMASSET, C. (1988) "Expert System and Legal Formalization: Evaluation of a Prototype in Quebec Housing Law", paper presented at the International Conference on Intelligence and Society, International Social Science Council,European Coordination Centre for Research and Documentation in Social Sciences, Vienna, March.Google Scholar
- THOMASSET, C., (1989), "Expert System in Quebec Housing Law: from HOME-Expert I to HOME-Expert II", paper presented at the International Conference on Law and Artificial Intelligence: Expert Systems in Law, CIRFID, Bologna, 29p.Google Scholar
- THOMASSET, C., BLANCHARD, F., PAQUIN, L.-C., (1990)"Legal knowledge elicitation: from textual databases to expert systems", DEXA '90, Data Base and Expert Systems Applications, Springler-Verlag, Wien New-York, 1990, pp. 167-173.Google ScholarCross Ref
- THOMASSET, C., BLANCHARD, F., PAQUIN, L.-C., (1991) "Loge-expert: an illustration of different phases of the development of an expert system in law", in: Expert Systems with applications, to be published.Google Scholar
- THOMASSET, C., HEBERT, R., (1988)," La d~mocratisafion du savoir juridique par son informatisafion, virtualit~s, contraintes,effets", in: Une d&nocratie technologique? R. Laperriere, H.Claret, P. P~ladeau, (eds), ACFAS-GRID, Monlx~al, pp. 343-358.Google Scholar
- THOMASSET,C., PAQUIN, L.-C., (1989), "Expert Systems in Law and the Representation of Legal Knowledge: Can we Isolate it from the Why and the Who?", III International Congress:Logica, Informatica, Diritto: Expert Systems in Law, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la documentazione giuridica, editore: Antonio A. Martino, Firenze, pp. 751-772.Google Scholar
- WROBLEWSKY, J., (1988)1, "Les langages juridiques: unetypologie", in: Droit et Socidtd, Revue internationale de thdorie du droit et de sociologie juridique, n~8, pp. 13-27.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Loge–expert: from a legal expert system to an information system for non-lawyers
Recommendations
Find an Expert: Designing Expert Selection Interfaces for Formal Help-Giving
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA critical aspect of formal help-giving tasks in the enterprise is finding the right expert. We built and evaluated a tool, Find an Expert, to examine what the most important expert selection criteria are for help-seekers and how to represent them in ...
Knowledge engineering problems during expert system development
Expert systems are artificial intelligence computer programs which emulate human expertise within some domain of interest. The recent financial successes of such expert systems as PROSPECTOR and XCON have created a demand in government and industry for ...
The credibility of expert witnesses in patent claim construction: the need to amend Rule 52 under Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz, Inc.
There has been much scholarly attention devoted to the policy implications of the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz, Inc., in which the Court held that district court findings regarding the credibility of expert ...
Comments