Using task context to improve programmer productivity

ABSTRACT

When working on a large software system, a programmer typically spends an inordinate amount of time sifting through thousands of artifacts to find just the subset of information needed to complete an assigned task. All too often, before completing the task the programmer must switch to working on a different task. These task switches waste time as the programmer must repeatedly find and identify the information relevant to the task-at-hand. In this paper, we present a mechanism that captures, models, and persists the elements and relations relevant to a task. We show how our task context model reduces information overload and focuses a programmer's work by filtering and ranking the information presented by the development environment. A task context is created by monitoring a programmer's activity and extracting the structural relationships of program artifacts. Operations on task contexts integrate with development environment features, such as structure display, search, and change management. We have validated our approach with a longitudinal field study of Mylar, our implementation of task context for the Eclipse development environment. We report a statistically significant improvement in the productivity of 16 industry programmers who voluntarily used Mylar for their daily work.

References

1. Backus, J.W. Automatic programming: properties and performance of FORTRAN systems I and II. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Mechanisation of Thought Processes, The National Physical Laboratory, 1958.
2. Bellotti, V., Dalal, B., Good, N., Bobrow, D. G., Ducheneaut, N. What a to-do: studies of task management towards the design of a personal task list manager. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 735--742. 2004.
3. Card, S. K. and D. Nation. Degree-of-Interest Trees: A Component of an Attention-Reactive User Interface. Advanced Visual Interfaces Conference, 2002.
4. DeLine, R., Czerwinski, C. and Robertson, G. Easing program comprehension by sharing navigation data. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages & Human-Centered Computing. p. 241--248, 2005.
5. DeLine, R. Khella, A. Czerwinski, M. Robertson, G. Visualization frameworks and empirical evaluation: Towards understanding programs through wear-based filtering. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Software Visualization. p. 183--192, 2005.
6. Dourish, P., Edwards, W. K., LaMarca, A., Salisbury, M. Using properties for uniform interaction in the Presto document system. Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 55--64. 1999.
7. Dragunov, A.N., Dietterich, T.G., Johnsrude, K., McLaughlin, M., Li, L., Herlocker, J.L. TaskTracer: A Desktop Environment to Support Multi-tasking Knowledge Workers. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. p. 75--82, 2005.
8. Furnas, G.W. Generalized fisheye views. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p.16--23, 1986.
9. Gonzales, V.M., Mark, G. Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness: managing multiple working spheres. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 113--120, 2004.
10. Harrison, W., Ossher, H., Tarr, P., Kruskal, V. and Tip, F. CAT: A Toolkit for Assembling Concerns. Research Report RC22686, IBM, Yorktown Heights, NY, Dec. 2002.
11. Hijikata, Y. User modeling II: Implicit user profiling for on demand relevance feedback. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. p. 198--205, 2004.
12. Hilbert, D. M., Redmiles, D.F. Separating the wheat from the chaff in Internet-mediated user feedback expectation-driven event monitoring. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin. p. 35--40, 1999.
13. Hill, W. C., Hollan, J. D., Wroblewski, D., and McCandless, T. Edit wear and read wear. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, p. 2--9. 1992.
14. Jacobs, T. Musial, B. Debugging and finding faults: Interactive visual debugging with UML. Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Software Visualization. p. 115--122, 2003.
15. Janzen, D. and de Volder, K. Programming With Crosscutting Effective Views, Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming. p. 195--218, 2004.
16. Kaptelinin, V. Integrating tools and tasks: UMEA: translating interaction histories into project contexts. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing System. p. 353--360, 2003.
17. Kersten, M., Murphy, G. C., Mylar: a degree-of-interest model for IDEs. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Aspect-Oriented Software Development. p. 159--168, 2005.
18. Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary (11th ed.), Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster. 2003.
19. Murphy, G. C., Kersten, M., Findlater, L., How are Java Software Developers using the Eclipse IDE? IEEE Software. Vol. 23, No. 5. 2006.
20. Murphy, G., Kersten, M., Robillard, M. and Cubranic, D. The Emergent Structure of Development Tasks. Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming. p. 33--48, 2005.
21. Parnas D. L., On the Criteria to be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 15, No. 12, 1972.
22. Rhodes, B. and Maes, P. Just-in-time information retrieval agents. IBM Systems Journal special issue on the MIT Media Laboratory, 39(3-4):685--704, 2000.
23. Robillard, M. P., and Murphy, G.C. Concern Graphs: Finding and Describing Concerns Using Structural Program Dependencies. IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Engineering. p. 406--416, 2002.
24. Robillard, M.P., Automatic Generation of Suggestions for Program Investigation. Proceedings of the Joint European Software Engineering Conference and ACM Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, p. 11--20, 2005.
25. Shen, J., Li, L., Dietterich, T.G., Herlocker, J.L., A hybrid learning system for recognizing user tasks from desk activities and email messages. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. p. 86--92, 2006.
26. Teitelman, W. and Masinter, L. The Interlisp programming environment. IEEE Computer, vol. 14, 25--34, 1981.

Index Terms

• Software and its engineering

  • Software notations and tools

    • Development frameworks and environments

      • Integrated and visual development environments