ABSTRACT
This paper introduces the concept of distributed constructionism, building on previous research on constructionism and on distributed cognition. It focuses particularly on the use of computer networks to support students working together on design and construction activities, and it argues that these types of activities are particularly effective in supporting the development of knowledge-building communities. The paper describes three main categories of distributed constructionist activities: discussing constructions, sharing constructions, and collaborating on constructions. In each category, it describes ongoing research projects at the MIT Media Lab and discusses how these projects support new ways of thinking and learning.
- {Bruckman, 1994a}. Bruckman, A. (1994a). Programming for Fun: MUDS as a Context for Collaborative Learning. National Educational Computing Conference, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- {Bruckman, 1994b}. Bruckman, A. (1994b). MOOSE Crossing: Creating a Learning Culture. PhD dissertation proposal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Lab.Google Scholar
- {Bruckman & Resnick, 1995}. Bruckman, A., & Resnick, M. (1995). The MediaMOO Project: Constructionism and Professional Community. Convergence, 1 (1), 94--109.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {Curtis, 1992}. Curtis, P. (1992). MUDding: Social Phenomena in Text-Based Virtual Realities. Directions in Advanced Computing (DIAC) conference. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
- {Evard, 1996}. Evard, M. (1996). A Community of Designers: Learning through Exchanging Questions and Answers. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- {Harel, 1991}. Harel, I. (1991). Children Designers: Interdisciplinary Constructions for Learning and Knowing Mathematics in a Computer-Rich School. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {Kafai, 1995}. Kafai, Y. (1995). Minds in Play. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- {Kimberly, 1995}. Kimberly, G. (1995). Learning in MarketPlace: Economic Objects to Think With and Talk About. Masters thesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Laboratory.Google Scholar
- {Papert, 1991}. Papert, S. (1991). Situating Construction. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
- {Resnick, 1993}. Resnick, M. (1993). Behavior Construction Kits. Communications of the ACM, 36 (7), 64--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {Resnick, 1994}. Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, Termites, and Traffic Jams: Explorations in Massively Parallel Microworlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {Salomon, 1994}. Salomon, G., ed. (1994). Distributed Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- {Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1991}. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1 (1), 37--68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Distributed constructionism
Recommendations
Computer Support for Constructionism in Context
ICALT '04: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning TechnologiesThe benefits of constructionism as a learning paradigm are widely recognised. Though the constructionist philosophy can be seen as applying to activities that are not necessarily computer-based (such as bricolage and concept mapping), its modern ...
Computationally-rich constructionism and at-risk learners
CRPIT '02: Proceedings of the Seventh world conference on computers in education conference on Computers in education: Australian topics - Volume 8In 1999, Maine Governor Angus King Jr. asked Seymour Papert to develop a model of what learning might look like in the future. Papert's forty years of work with children and computing, as well as the historic impact information technology is having on ...
Comments