skip to main content
10.1145/1160633.1160798acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A context-aware approach for service selection using ontologies

Published:08 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Selecting the right parties to interact with is a fundamental problem in open and dynamic environments. The problem is exemplified when the number of interacting parties is high and the parties' reasons for selecting others vary. We examine the problem of service selection in an e-commerce setting where consumer agents cooperate to identify service providers that would satisfy their service needs the most. Previous approaches to service selection are based on capturing and exchanging the ratings of consumers to providers. Contrary to previous, rating-based service selection, this paper advocates an objective experience-based approach for service provider selection, in which consumers record their experiences with service providers rather than the overall, subjective ratings for a provider. A consumer's experience with a service provider is represented using an ontology that can capture subtle details including the context in which the service was requested. When a service consumer decides to share her experiences with a second service consumer, the receiving consumer evaluates the experience using its own context and evaluation criteria. By sharing experiences rather than ratings, the service consumers can model service providers more accurately and thus can select the service providers for their needs more correctly.

References

  1. E-bay web site: http://www.ebay.com, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kaon2 web site: http://kaon2.semanticweb.org, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Owl-s: Semantic markup for web services, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Castelfranchi and R. Falcone. Principles of trust for MAS: cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, pages 72--79, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Şensoy, F. C. Pembe, H. Zirtiloǧlu, P. Yolum, and A. Bener. Experience-Based Service Provider Selection in Agent Mediated E-Commerce. To appear in Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2006. Available at: www.cmpe.boun.edu.tr/~pyolum/eaai-2005.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Şensoy and P. Yolum. A comparative study of reasoning techniques for service selection. Technical Report FBE(CmpE01)2006-2, Boǧaziçi University, 2006. Available at: www.cmpe.boun.edu.tr/~pyolum/Sensoy Yolum-TechReport.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork. Pattern Classification. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T. D. Huynh, N. R. Jennings, and N. Shadbolt. Fire: An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 18--22, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Maximilien and M. P. Singh. A framework and ontology for dynamic web services selection. IEEE Internet Computing, 8(5):84--93, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. C. Montgomery. Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Sabater and C. Sierra. Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pages 475--482, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Sen and N. Sajja. Robustness of reputation-based trust: Boolean case. In Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pages 288--293, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. L.-K. Soh and C. Chen. Balancing ontological and operational factors in refining multiagent neighborhoods. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pages 745--752, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. Yolum and M. P. Singh. Flexible protocol specification and execution: Applying event calculus planning using commitments. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pages 527--534, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Yolum and M. P. Singh. Engineering self-organizing referral networks for trustworthy service selection. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, A35(3):396--407, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. B. Yu and M. P. Singh. Emergence of agent-based referral networks. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pages 1268--1269, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H. Zhang, W. B. Croft, B. Levine, and V. Lesser. A multi-agent approach for peer-to-peer based information retrieval system. In Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pages 456--463, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AAMAS '06: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
    May 2006
    1631 pages
    ISBN:1595933034
    DOI:10.1145/1160633

    Copyright © 2006 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 May 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,155of5,036submissions,23%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader