skip to main content
10.5555/1150240.1150295dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Imagination, production, and collaboration in project-based learning using multimedia

Published:12 December 1999Publication History

ABSTRACT

There is evidence that technology has played a role in transforming classrooms into places where students are actively constructing knowledge and where teachers structure learning resources to facilitate discovery, problem-solving, and collaboration. In our research, we consider the roles of two processes that use technology to support a project approach to learning using multimedia: creating cycles of student imagination and production and supporting well-developed student collaboration. Our paper examines how technology and pedagogy work together in a fourth-fifth grade classroom taught by the fourth author to support student imagination, production, and collaboration and explores mechanisms that relate these characteristics to the building of student identities as members in a community of practice.

References

  1. Allen, C., & Pea, R. (1992). The social construction of genre in multimedia learning environments. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers. Teaching, Learning, Computing Report. CRITO Institute. Available online at: http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/FINDINGS/internet-use/startpage.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cohen, A. L., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Discourse about ideas: Monitoring and regulation in face-to-face and computer-mediated environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 6, 93--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Erickson, J., & Lehrer, R. (1998). The evolution of critical standards as students design hypermedia documents. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 351--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kirkpatrick, W. H. (1918). The Project Method. Teachers College Record. Also reprinted in Schultz, F.(Ed.) Sources: Notable Selections in Education. Guilford, CT: The Dushkin Publishing Group., Inc. pp.26--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lehrer, R. (1993). Authors of knowledge: patterns of hypermedia design. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. Elementary School Journal, 97, 341--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Means, B., & Golan, S. (1998). Transforming teaching and learning with multimedia technology. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Means, B., & Olson, K. (1995). Technology's role in education reform: Findings from a national study of innovating schools. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Penuel, W. R., & Means, B. (1999, July). Observing teaching practice in project-based learning using multimedi: A Tool for Evaluators. Paper presented at the Secretary of Education's National Conference on Educational Technology. Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rawcliffe, F. W. (1925). Practical problem projects. Chicago: F. E. Compton & Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 209--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sandholtz, J. Ringstaff, K., & Dwyer, D. (1996). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. Cupertino, CA: Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilcox, B., Williams, L., & Reutzel, D. R. (1997). Efects of task roles on participation and productivity in the middle grades. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 344--351.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Imagination, production, and collaboration in project-based learning using multimedia

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image DL Hosted proceedings
      CSCL '99: Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning
      December 1999
      962 pages

      Publisher

      International Society of the Learning Sciences

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 December 1999

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCL '99 Paper Acceptance Rate82of82submissions,100%Overall Acceptance Rate182of334submissions,54%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader